IT'S LEGO, NOT LEGOS - www.legos.com
Created on: September 8th, 2005
IT'S LEGO, NOT LEGOS - www.legos.com
TDP 
None ( ._.)

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(3.97) 159 4 30

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 1 0 0 11,973

Inbound links:

views url
202 http://www.reddit.com/r/gifs/comments/210gts/we_can_rebuild_it_w
96 http://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/1unduo/the_used_wii_we_o
76 http://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/1i0asa/a_crew_in_germany_p
71 https://www.google.co.uk/
71 http://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/1sa0ym/iss_assembly_began

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
September 8th, 2005
(1)
>_> Who cares, no one would call it Lego Bricks.
September 8th, 2005
(1)
f*ck you people, I'll call it whatever the hell I want.
September 8th, 2005
(1)
exactly. I don't get what the problem is with calling it "legos".
September 10th, 2005
(1)
This is the same as adobe hating it when people use photoshop as a verb. EX: I just photoshopped this picture
September 10th, 2005
(1)
THOSE BASTARDS!!!! I'VE BEEN FAILING FOR YEARS!!!
September 10th, 2005
(-4)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-4)
Kids still play with Legos? WTF get a console/PC f*gs
September 10th, 2005
(1)
Are you f*cking kidding me? Is that for real?
September 10th, 2005
(1)
5/5
September 10th, 2005
(4)
HEY *ssholeS, YOU'RE RUINING LEGO BRICKS PERMANENTLY BY REFERRING TO THEM AS LEGOS! THE COMPANY COULD SERIOUSLY GO BANKRUPT IF YOU KEEP CALLING THEM LEGOS!
September 10th, 2005
(1)
So weird.
September 10th, 2005
(-5)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-5)
Legos are a children's toy
September 10th, 2005
(2)
and you have a child's intellect
September 10th, 2005
(0)
I love Legos.
September 12th, 2005
(0)
Everything I know is now a lie.
October 5th, 2005
(1)
Good choice of music.
October 30th, 2005
(1)
LOL.
November 26th, 2005
(1)
lol
December 30th, 2005
(1)
I pity all those poor 3-year-olds
February 22nd, 2006
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
Chuck Norris calls them legos
March 14th, 2006
(1)
is this like we refer to deer as deer, not deers. I don't care who they think they are, no parent is going to correct their child when they are playing with legos by saying, "no junior, not legos, you are playing with lego." I mean kids speak bad enough
March 14th, 2006
(1)
with aim lingo, we don't need to make things more confusing for them. Oh, and damn character limit.
April 11th, 2006
(-5)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-5)
I don't get it. Why is their website called LEGOS.COM and we can't call them legos? f*cking douchebags.
(4)
No, LEGOS is a redirect page. You lose FTW. LEGO is a better hobby than drugs or collecting ACTION FIGURES.
May 11th, 2007
(-1)
Speak for yourself. I love my Half-Baked action figures.
June 26th, 2006
(1)
Picky, picky.
November 5th, 2006
(1)
I see they have changed their minds - http://legosnotlegosreborn.ytmnd.com/
(1)
LEGO is trying to protect their trademark. If your term becomes common-place, you lose the brand, which makes you lose lots of money. This is the same reason you get a "Pepsi?" whenever you order Coke at a restaurant. They taste similarly enough that no one cares but Coke actually sends people out to restaurants to find any that don't make sure to distinguish Pepsi from Coke and sues them if they don't.
(1)
same reason why apples hates when any mp3 player is called an ipod lol
June 25th, 2007
(0)
News to me!
December 27th, 2008
(1)
What a crock of sh*t. You don't say "hey man, pass the kleenex tissue wipes" No, you go "hand me the kleenexes." Plural. It's the same thing as using "google" as a verb... it's just easier to "google" something than to say "run a search on google.com". You're still using the brand name... how does making it plural change anything? F*gs.