Response to "Why God Exists" (UPDATE)
Created on: September 8th, 2006
Response to "Why God Exists"  (UPDATE)
Whetstone has updated his site to include responses to my site -- I am doing the same. This was originally called "Why God DOESN'T Exist;" I renamed it to something more accurate.

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(3.67) 590 39 396

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
1 1 0 0 16,113

Inbound links:

views url
2 http://bigreplicastore.com/
1 http://buy-cigaretteonline.com/
1 http://allmedshoponline.com/
1 http://edfaststore.com/

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
<< 1 2 >>
September 8th, 2006
(0)
sh*t
September 8th, 2006
(0)
5, + I'm going to donate to it to counter the Christian crap flooding YTMND.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
you suck much dick
September 8th, 2006
(0)
buh
September 8th, 2006
(-2)
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
September 8th, 2006
(-2)
you must play world of WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWarcraft
September 8th, 2006
(-2)
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
September 8th, 2006
(-2)
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
September 8th, 2006
(-1)
5
September 8th, 2006
(-2)
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
September 8th, 2006
(0)
It's nice to see educated arguements instead of "IM RIGHT YOURE WRONG PWNT".
September 8th, 2006
(0)
Flaw in your argument: Intellectual Masturbation.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
This was a very nice read. Thank you.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
needs moar pheonix wright
September 8th, 2006
(0)
I love it, but slow it the hell down. I read fast, and even I'm having a hard time keeping up.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
I agree with your conclusions, especially in the case of objection #2.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
How is this faulty by mental mastrubation? We are only showing the lack of conclusive power in this rebuttal.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
Hey I met you on vent one time! (Katy is me) but uh, I don't know how to vote this, I am tired of these religious YTMNDs, I come to YTMND to get a good laugh, but I see alot of religious things, is it a fad I missed? Well I am going to leave it unvoted for, but good job anyways
September 8th, 2006
(0)
Whetstone also left out a major part of the universe... energy.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
Kick-Ass.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
Well DONE! These are the kinds of things that make me want to study philosophy and such.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
Had to be done. You win.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
biblethumpers owned.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
I like it alas 1'd like a bitch
September 8th, 2006
(0)
take it to a forum
September 8th, 2006
(0)
keep religion off of ytmnd.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
First of all, its "causal" not "casual"..you made that mistake numerous times. Second of all, you have committed a strawman fallacy, which is in so many words taking what someone said way out of proportion. Third of all, NEDM
September 8th, 2006
(1)
Bingo. Thank you, Chichiri. =) Christian use circular reasoning to explain God and existance... then attempt to discredit Evolution, the Big Bang, as well as other scientific theories as circular reasoning and "junk science." Christian circular reasoning = Hypocrital self-refuting arguement. Simple as that. What they don't get... science isn't suppose to be the end-all-be-all answer... its constantly changing theories that become altered when new information arises. I'd rather spend my lifetime learning about my existence that live in a tiny Christian bubble and refuses information that contradicts my "beliefs." Silly how humans will defend their beliefs to the bitter end of death. Ideas are so much nicer to hold... and so much easier to change.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
:D
September 8th, 2006
(0)
I sorely miss when the closest thing you'd come to religious banter on YTMND was, "I'm Jesus, lol." There's been interesting and intelligent conversation as a result of all this Christbot insanity, but my head can't take anymore. That being said, WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
September 8th, 2006
(0)
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
September 8th, 2006
(0)
Take this bullsh*t to a forum.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
I'd like to add something to the self-refuting side of things. Whestone argues that the Universe cannot be infinite in duration (it must have a cause) because of entropy. Entropy, however, only applies to closed systems- a supernatural diety would mean the Universe is NOT a closed system, meaning the Universe could be inifinite in duration, thus eradicating the need for god to create it. Paradox ad nauseum.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
Hey guys, religion!
September 8th, 2006
(-1)
OBJECTION: There is evidence that clearly reveals a contradiction in the testimony of the WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWitness
September 8th, 2006
(0)
Una deshonra a nosotros toda. Nunca demuestre su cara otra vez, tonto. >:(
September 8th, 2006
(0)
+5 for your rebuttal manifesting itself into an actual YTMND and not a stupid comment. So what are your peronal beliefs?
September 8th, 2006
(0)
This one wins even more. 5
September 8th, 2006
(0)
I agree with t3knomanser. The only reason why the beginning of the univserse is a matter of debate is because humans are unwilling to comprehend infinity. The universe has simply always existed, and will forever continue its pattern of big bangs and big crunches as it transfers matter and energy around.
September 8th, 2006
(1)
don't even waste your time with these people. this is the same song with a new tune in the hopes to prove that they arent batsh*t insane religious fanatics and there is a good reason to teach this sh*t in school. they take all of this sh*t they've been preaching for thousands of years and add a "scientific" twist to it so that people won't be able to say it's religion. sadly even the best scientific explanation from both side is full of holes so let's hold off discussing it for another 50,000 years.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
Lol. If God/the bible says masturbating is antireligious, why is so easy to do? That's my argument.
September 8th, 2006
(-1)
and i restate: stop arguing about stuff that nobody can agree on
September 8th, 2006
(0)
Lollers, 5. Stupid christians who think we should be christians. (Other christians = cool)
September 8th, 2006
(0)
This owns hard.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
Furthermore: the bible still says earth is the center of the universe, and man still says that God is just a really big intangible Man. This vein of theism is not FAITH, it is ARROGANCE on the part of humanity.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
you win for using logic correctly
September 8th, 2006
(0)
Genesis 5:1 And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters: 5 And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died. 6 And Seth lived an hundred and five years, and begat Enos: 7 And Seth lived after he begat Enos eight hundred and seven years, and begat sons and daughters: 8 And all the days of Seth were nine hundred and twelve years: and he died. 9 And Enos lived ninety years, and begat Cainan: 10 And Enos lived after he begat Cainan eight hundred and fifteen years, and begat sons and daughters: 11 And all the days of Enos were nine hundred and five years: and he died. 12 And Cainan lived seventy years, and begat Mahalaleel: 13 And Cainan lived after he begat Mahalaleel eight hundred and forty years, and begat sons and daughters: 14 And all the days of Cainan were nine hundred and ten years: and he died. 15 And Mahalaleel lived sixty and five years, and begat Jared: 16 And Mahalaleel lived after he begat Jared
September 8th, 2006
(0)
17 And all the days of Mahalaleel were eight hundred ninety and five years: and he died. 18 And Jared lived an hundred sixty and two years, and he begat Enoch: 19 And Jared lived after he begat Enoch eight hundred years, and begat sons and daughters: 20 And all the days of Jared were nine hundred sixty and two years: and he died. 21 And Enoch lived sixty and five years, and begat Methuselah: 22 And Enoch walked with God after he begat Methuselah three hundred years, and begat sons and daughters: 23 And all the days of Enoch were three hundred sixty and five years: 24 And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him. 25 And Methuselah lived an hundred eighty and seven years, and begat Lamech: 26 And Methuselah lived after he begat Lamech seven hundred eighty and two years, and begat sons and daughters: 27 And all the days of Methuselah were nine hundred sixty and nine years: and he died. 28 And Lamech lived an hundred eighty and two years, and begat a son: 29 And he called his name Noah
September 8th, 2006
(-3)
Lol -4 for being a jew
September 8th, 2006
(0)
Matthew 1:1 The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham. 1:2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren; 1:3 And Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar; and Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram; 1:4 And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon; 1:5 And Salmon begat Booz of Rachab; and Booz begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse; 1:6 And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias; 1:7 And Solomon begat Roboam; and Roboam begat Abia; and Abia begat Asa; 1:8 And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias; 1:9 And Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz
September 8th, 2006
(0)
1:10 And Ezekias begat Manasses; and Manasses begat Amon; and Amon begat Josias; 1:11 And Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren, about the time they were carried away to Babylon: 1:12 And after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; and Salathiel begat Zorobabel; 1:13 And Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor; 1:14 And Azor begat Sadoc; and Sadoc begat Achim; and Achim begat Eliud; 1:15 And Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob; 1:16 And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Raptor Jesus, who is called Jesus, lol. Also c*cks.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
I watched it 5 times just to make sure there were no faults in your logic, and I couldn't find one. I watched "Why God Exists" 3 times, and after I stopped stabbing q-tips into my penis to take my mind off the horrible badness of it, I found loads and loads of logic holes. Well done.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
This f*ckin sh*t has gotten out ofhand, lol.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
You win at life.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
Very well done, I liked the analogy of pepples causing avalanches, that was my main objection to Whetstone. (That intelligence cannot come from non-intelligence, and that life cannot come from non-life.) I used the experiments of Cyril Pennomperuma to prove this point. Thank you very much for this comprehensive rebbuttal
September 8th, 2006
(0)
Whetstone's reasons were circular. That's good for me. I don't debate this sh*t anymore. There's no point. Nuts will still think whatever they want. Leave it at that.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
Very sexy.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
"1) Everything was created, or it wasn't." I believe he said space, time, and matter were created. Not "everything".
September 8th, 2006
(-1)
why did you make two?
September 8th, 2006
(0)
I was going to 4 it for being way too long. Then I saw the W spammer. Way to represent your religion moran. 5'd
September 8th, 2006
(0)
None of us can prove he doesn't or does exist why even try? Let's keep YTMND Funny people...
September 8th, 2006
(0)
Maybe this is silly of me, but I would much rather see something thought-provoking than "POLAND LOLDSOFAOTSJOTAE", which is most of the sh*t I see. Also, Whetstone, you fail debating.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
The orginal "YTMND" involved Sean Connery's line from "Finding Forrester".... Hardly thought provoking at all...
September 8th, 2006
(0)
im tired of boring sh*t like this..
September 8th, 2006
(0)
I agree, and this was a well-made site, but.... this is YTMND. Religion can GTFO.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
Whetstone fails
September 8th, 2006
(0)
5 for chaos theory
September 8th, 2006
(0)
There needs to be some Phoenix Wright music in here.:P
September 8th, 2006
(0)
There is a fatal flaw in your argument: too many words
September 8th, 2006
(0)
also WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
September 8th, 2006
(0)
you win the internets.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
5'd for (1) noticing how christians use laws of physics and logic to prove existence of something that doesn't follow those rules. (2.) for using axiomatic set theory somewhat correctly.
September 8th, 2006
(-1)
Wow, you have way too much time on your hands (aside from fapping to Tubgirl) to actually construct this piece of crap. BElieve what you like and let others believe what they like. Since when does it matter what you think about someone else? You're just wasting your time buddy, seriously. LEt him believe what he wants and you do the same. In other words,get a life aside from making protest YTMND's. Grow up.
September 8th, 2006
(-1)
I'm so tired of theological junk on the internet. Whether you are a theist or not, the first cause argument is totally juvenile and noone should have to be told this.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
I NEED THAT SONG! I assume you made it? Sounds like reason.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
Sabrams, better a protest site than no sites at all. Seriously, make one.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
wow, I hope Whetstone actually reads this and replies.
September 8th, 2006
(-2)
1'd because this sucks.
September 8th, 2006
(-2)
and to sarria, you have no spine.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
You know what I do when I start thinking about whether God exists or not? Stop.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
Too fast, but nice to see someone kick Whetstone's ass.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
give him a break, it's not as if ytmnd is in danger of becoming flooded with non-comical sites. p.s. slow down the .gif
September 8th, 2006
(0)
I hope you take no offense from this, but I personally thought this was boring. I have to admit though, it was well done and writen.
September 8th, 2006
(-1)
this whole god philosophy BS needs to stop
September 8th, 2006
(2)
"Xoolio -- and to sarria, you have no spine." On the contrary... I'm able to form my own thoughts and views on life and how I should live it. What's it like living your life in fear of "Hell?" I bet I know what it doesn't feel like... Freedom of expression and the ability to form ones own thoughts and ideals. Living by a book of stories must be fun, eh? Sling more mud elsewhere, peon.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
I was thinking of doing the same. 5 for saving me the effort and doing it well(ish)
September 8th, 2006
(0)
All the Christians trying to prove God exist on this site is just as pathetic as everyone else who tries to do the opposite.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
Grood.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
Owned.
September 8th, 2006
(-1)
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWW WWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
September 8th, 2006
(0)
ftw
September 8th, 2006
(0)
You know, I saw this in the "newly created" ytmnds and was going to check and see if it was worth sh*t, then donate, so as to counterbalance all the religious sh*t in the "sponsored YTMNDs" box right now. Unfortunatly I accidently refreshed and was unable to find it again. I will five this because it does NOT push an agenda--it is a simple argument designed to difuse an already pushed agenda. Well done.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
f*ck god!
September 8th, 2006
(0)
pwnt? Yeah, pwnt.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
great work, but i have an average to keep low.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
well done but what he's trying to say is that the actual properties of matter must have a cause
September 8th, 2006
(0)
Meatshakes, I'd rather not belittle myself and this good community with such a wasteful thing.
September 8th, 2006
(0)
I
September 8th, 2006
(0)
Newsflash. GOOD Christians don't waste their time trying to prove God because they're too busy participating in a religion of FAITH! 2'd for change of pace, but really ytmnd is a bad format for this type of thing.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
lol i didn't understand anything that is being discussed. >_>. -4 for being jewish though
September 9th, 2006
(0)
pwned!!! but it goes too fast... so 1 4 u.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
way to debate!
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Nicely done, a few spelling errors, overall I would agree.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
you rock
September 9th, 2006
(0)
5 for ytmnders with expansive minds -1 for text going too fast a suggestion for both of you and anyone interested "Anshelm - Monologium" good read
September 9th, 2006
(0)
5'd for being very logical straightforward and coherant. Good job sir.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
First 10 seconds were flawed, GG in misconstrewing what his first point was. Good arguement though
September 9th, 2006
(0)
5 for having an objection I didn't even notice.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Uhh ...yeah. That settles that, can we please move on? Now lets have a fad with frogs in it. They are so jumpy!
September 9th, 2006
(0)
lol redshift
September 9th, 2006
(0)
I like how no one can refute it and just does the "la-la-la-la" deal like all close minded people do. Why did some idiot start the "I can prove God exists" stuff, anyway? It just gives logic a chance to ruin their entire argument. Don't make a statement if you can't handle it if someone possibly disproves it. Good job and let that be that.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
ur wrong. lol
September 9th, 2006
(0)
^(KingD) No the idiot whose site you 5'd because you're a Bible beater is wrong. He distorts science and logic to make his arguments; then when his points are debunked he can't argue his way anywhere but deeper into the hole he dug.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
The whole cause and effect theory could very well have been another universe collapsing in upon itself, to produce a singularity... He didn't even touch on that theory. (Which still leads us in circles, as to where the core matter originated from, but that's another matter)
September 9th, 2006
(0)
PS: 5 points for bringing valid counter-points to the issue.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
YTMND is the last place on the internets where religion needs to be discussed. Except for maybe porn sites.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
theism-antitheism competetive circle-jerk ftw
September 9th, 2006
(0)
you left a lot from Whetstone's site out. But then again if you left the information you took out, in your criticisms would be false. so 1'd for half truths and misinformation
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Goes too fast but a win for logic. A is A; the rest follows.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
I'm just really enjoying the Back and forth here...
September 9th, 2006
(0)
(disregard my above post, it was based on your old ytmnd not the updated one) Here is some critique of your ytmnd AND some ideas to add to your ytmnd as arguments. First critique of yours: You use the example small pebbles starting an avalanch. HAHA that is not caused by the force in the pebble (s) but the force of GRAVITY deriving from the earth's pull on everything involved. But otherwise very good points with your updates. I would like you to refrain from using Quotes that Whetstone MIGHT have said. Just use his actual responses, because hypothetical questions dont count as evidence. Now for whetstone's yrmnd. He uses the theory of relativity as exidence for the existance of God...however THEORIES are not true 100% of the time.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
It's good, but could you slow it down, skippy? Some of us didn't finish War and Peace in thirty minutes like you did.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
he also says that the first cause "sounds" a lot like god...but is it really? he says it is, but doesnt proove it. I will use a general example using variables "x" and "Y". substances X and Y are very similar in physical appearance, smell, taste and texture, however thier chemical makeups are completely different and thier reactions with other substances differ. Just because something SOUNDS like X doesnt mean it is, it could be Y. He is right about there being a first cause, however that is all he prooved, nothing else.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Didnt your parents teach you not to get into arguments with f*cking morons? Also note that Whetstone was very very confused about what entropy means.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
This seemed pretty cute. The other site reminded me of that bit from http://www.godlessgeeks.com/LINKS/GodProof.htm too much. Though I would think rephrasing to some basic logical fallacies could be nice, like limitations of possibilities and such. http://www.logicalfallacies.info/falsedilemmas.html
September 9th, 2006
(0)
My mind has been raped, but not as much as reading Whetstones crap.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
5'd FOR BLIND BELIEVERS SAYING "ITS TEH GOD, LOL, HE DONE DID IT, YOU KNOOOW DAT, YOU SATAN POSSEEESSED!, YOU GON'A BURN! PS. I PRAY FOR YOU!" hahahahahahahahahahhaha
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Well played sir. That's the way to do it. No one has to prove that gods don't exist since no one has proven they DO exist.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
The burden of proof always lies with the one making the claim that something does exist.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Neither belongs on ytmnd
September 9th, 2006
(0)
basically
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Mental Masturbation. I think I'll take naked blondes over proving/disproving God.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
wow i cant blive that i wathched that whole thing
September 9th, 2006
(0)
TYVM sir. These idiots need to be c*ckslapped into place occasionaly.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
worst music ever.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
5'd, but needs more Brian Peppers.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
There is no god period. 1'd for too much reading
September 9th, 2006
(0)
it's funny because your argument has just as many flaws.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
I liked the update better, but it would have been better if you'd cut the Willy Wonka "You lose, good day sir!" at the end. Course, my vote thing is broke, but 5 anyway.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
LOL, terrible electric piano solo.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
5 for pwnage. -1 for boring, Add a panda with chainsaws for arms and you got yourself a 5
September 9th, 2006
(0)
I sponsored this because I'm tired of being told how evil I am because I'm NOT a devout christian. I come to YTMND for laughs not to be chastised for not giving a flying f*ck about god.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
oh wow more text about boring unfunny sh*t on my screen i wont read wow people are giving this money holy sh*t get a life noone cares about your god unless god is real then you are f*cked
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Good, but too fast in some spots.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Both of you have put together common and rather terrible arguments for both sides. If you're really interested in this subject, then you should both take college classes in Religious Studies that examine the history of proofs for the Existence of God, i.e. Aristotle's Mover, Anselm's neo-Platonic arg., Aquinas' 5 proofs (and rejection of Anselm). Then, you might know enough to know that these YTMNDs are horribly insufficient for proving anything.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
No one, you or him can really argue this subject as a human. No one really knows at all, it's too deep for us.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
"Both of you have put together common and rather terrible arguments for both sides. If you're really interested in this subject, then you should both take college classes in Religious Studies that examine the history of proofs for the Existence of God, i.e. Aristotle's Mover, Anselm's neo-Platonic arg., Aquinas' 5 proofs (and rejection of Anselm). Then, you might know enough to know that these YTMNDs are horribly insufficient for proving anything." Look at me stroke my mental c*ck. Ohh yeahhh, now watch me nut all over your arguments because they're so unintellectual and SMALL! Aughghhhhhh... *Squip* *Squip*
September 9th, 2006
(0)
^-^
September 9th, 2006
(0)
site goes too fast -- also the logic is crap
September 9th, 2006
(0)
THE GAUNTLET IS THROWN!! ...too much assumption about his counter-arguments. It hurts your credibility. Kudos for addressing his real objections, but your counter to #2 really seems weak.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
What this argument sounds like to me. http://neverendingargument.ytmnd.com/
September 9th, 2006
(0)
TOTALLY OWNED!!!!!
September 9th, 2006
(0)
http://undeniableproof.ytmnd.com/
September 9th, 2006
(0)
lol college reading level < this ytmnd. Slow it down so the rest of the people who didn't write it and don't know what it says can read it, too. But from what I did read it pwns.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
spam forums not ytmnd
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Informative. I don't think a single man alive can prove or disprove such a thing. =/
September 9th, 2006
(0)
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWW
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Very logical and thought out statement. Nothing less than a 5 and a fav could honor this work.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Man created God in his own image in an attempt to explain the creation of the universe. None of us know the truth and most of us are afraid of whats out there and what we do not understand. A nice simple "God" that blankets everything from existance to death makes us feel safe and sated. I beleive that when I die thats it, game over...but I dont fear death infact Im just happy to have existed in any form at all which in itself is pretty amazing. the very idea of god nulls the mind to different possibilites of why the universe exists. So much so that man pathetically kills man over an ideal of god...becuase your afraid of other possibilites being true and no one wants thier immportality put into question. Personally I beleive we created god out of necesity
September 9th, 2006
(0)
-1 for obnoxious music
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Excellent site, thank you for giving me that awesome read
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Whetstone loses. You win.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Anyone who 1'd this should be noted as being unable to conduct a logical discussion
September 9th, 2006
(0)
gtfo my frontpage
September 9th, 2006
(0)
tl:dr Also, not funny
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Your new title is more accurate, you can't really prove he does/doesn't exist. I believe in him, but I like to see logic on YTMND. But seriously religious debate gtfo.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Good stuff. Dunno why Max is getting pissy about either of these; YTMNDer's are more then capable of dealing with poor logic, and this is the proof.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
you win for proving that we can't prove God. pwnt.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
On the same theme: http://godlogic.ytmnd.com/ Disclaimer: This site involves sarcasm. Don't waste effort flaming me for being a fundie, or having faulty logic.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
1'd for re-submission, douche.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
If you slow it done to the point where more than half a paragraph can be read per slide i will change this to a 5. Other that that i thought this was well done you had some good points. I couldn't finish the entirety of the "clip" (for lack of a better term) because my head would explode from not understanding a lot of it because it goes to fast
September 9th, 2006
(0)
YOu r soo FTW
September 9th, 2006
(0)
lol owned
September 9th, 2006
(0)
I sit through physics class three times a week and this is what I get? -1 for straw man
September 9th, 2006
(0)
5'd because I actually followed this without losing you. And because you're SO f*cking right.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
flame war!!!!
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Hey, I am a devoted Catholic, but still gotta say, Whetstone doesnt prove sh*t. 5 :)
September 9th, 2006
(0)
so true no evidence for god
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Arguing on the internet is like competing in the special olympics....
September 9th, 2006
(0)
awsome
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Who gives a f*ck? I should downvote both your sites for trying to use ytmnd as a medium for your masturbatory arguments on god. Seriously, it's people like you and Whetstone that turn the world to sh*t.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
sh*t
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Logic wins.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Almost 4 (-1 for the tune) but 5'd for truth prevails, and also effort.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
good one, but.. christians, GET THE F*CK OFF OF HERE. we dont need to hear about this "god" thing that magically got pulled out of someones ass. hes not real. its a lie. GET OVER IT. why is it so hard to realise that something doesnt exist. ok i pose a question: "if god created the universe, then where did he come from?" you cant answer this because he doesnt exist. science has more proof and theories backing up the big bang theory. the god theory has "GOD CREATED EVERYTHING. but i cant prove it...." ........ so what did we learn christians?
September 9th, 2006
(0)
You win.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
oh by the way: have you heard of the new particle-accelerator being built? (sweden or somewhere around there, i cant remember)it is going to make a "big bang" BUT at a much smaller scale, they are hoping to prove that the big bang theory is correct, and that it is possible to have started everything this way.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
I automatically 5'd this because that why god exists YTMND is so f*cking stupid, but you should slow it down a bit, especially when you have the other guys reponses, its hard to read it all.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Your arguments aren't very clear. Maybe you should add a flowchart.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
As soon as I saw the Big Bang mentioned I realised how limited your scientifc knowledge was.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
I salute you for being smart enough to to think logically, and yet stupid enough to waste your time making this ytmnd. Cheers and 5 stars to you sir!
September 9th, 2006
(0)
slow down!!!!
September 9th, 2006
(0)
seriously, this is one of the best thought out ytmnds ever. i really like your reasoning regarding the law of causality- if it affects the universe, then why doesnt it affect god? that was pure genious. if i could give your site ten stars instead of five i would. also, something to add maybe, is the theory of the big crunch combined with the theory of cyclical time. (basically the big crunch is and event where all matter in the universe condenses and entropy is reset, creating a new big bang or "genesis event").
September 9th, 2006
(0)
http://ytmndwarend.ytmnd.com/ is my response.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
eh
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Here is your upvote. @_@ Fonnz - Helping YTMND since 2005.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Made the site that I was planning (and probably a lot of others also) to make, and with clear presentation and snappy music :) You win, good day sir.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
youre my hero!
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Here is your upvote. @_@ Fonnz - Helping YTMND since 2005.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
You actually think the majority of YTMND is above 12? Just kidding, but just as well, this is an intellectual [I guess], arguement, and it really doesn't belong on YTMND.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
good job
September 9th, 2006
(0)
I believe in God, but like you, I believe he can't be proved with logic. 5'd for dismantling the cosmological argument
September 9th, 2006
(0)
5 because I'm glad someone had the balls to stand up to whetstone, but -1 because I long for the days when YTMND was free of this religious sh*t. I miss plain old "lol, it's jesus".
September 9th, 2006
(0)
don't think it's a matter of if god exists rather than which god exists...
September 9th, 2006
(0)
dumb read thomas aquinas's book, don't read ytmnd
September 9th, 2006
(0)
We need a "Why FSM exists" ytmnd. But yours has very cool music, so 5.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
5 for understanding the underlying principles of chaos theory
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Christians for the lose!
September 9th, 2006
(0)
+5 and favs to both you and Whetstone. Philosophytmnd, I like it.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Why are you people fiving him? He's bringing religion into YTMND. Is this not what you people are against? Why does he deserve a five, but Whetstone deserves a one? Hypocrites. http://ytmndwarend.ytmnd.com/
September 9th, 2006
(0)
All of you are nothing but holy war jingoists. You all merely follow the guy that says something you agree with, and blindly too. None of you have minds of your own on this subject, you just know to hate and obey intolerance.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWW
September 9th, 2006
(0)
5 for great justice (and logical reasoning)
September 9th, 2006
(0)
nice, interestin rebuttal
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Thank you.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Just stop.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Interesting rebuttal indeed.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
I am God. But still 4.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
lol, rebuttal.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
There is no proof that God is real and that God isn't real. So I don't know why we still argue. If there is a God the only god we bow down to is the Question Mark, because we don't know if he's really there or not.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Twenty people have now checked the original beacause of your advertising.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
why do those without faith work so hard to disprove those with it?
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Props for bothering with philosophy at all. I am a Christian but am perfectly willing to engage in logical debate about the existence of God as was Whetstone - he just had some bad logic. I want you to try something, just as a request from me - try to imagine a world outside of time. The limitations of THIS universe and our frail minds render it impossible to do so, although if you meet with success, do give me a call.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
I disagree, i feel that Whetstone made some good points against you. Honestly? You gotta take the fight to him. I believe what he says, but i like to see a good ytmnd fight.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
you just whipped my brain's ass
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Needs to move slower. But.. Yeah, this arguement is getting boring though. We all know that Whetstone just preaches out of his neck, but we don't need to keep going over it.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Logic and reasoning on ytmnd. How can I not 5? Good work, friend.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
logic or not, keep this sh*t off ytmnd thx
September 9th, 2006
(0)
FYAD
September 9th, 2006
(0)
I'VE FALLEN, AND I CAN'T GET UP! GET GET GET GET GET GET GET GET GET UP! AND I CANT....CANT CANT CANT CANT.....GET UP GET UP! (whetstone failing) YOU WIN THE INTERNETS.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
whetstone had one weakness, believing in god!
September 9th, 2006
(0)
this comment is NSFWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WW
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Wow, you're going to change what I believe in with a sh*tty YTMND.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
5'd for not forcing religious beliefs down my throat but rather debating with Whetstone and most likely proving him WRONG
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Bravo, this is one of the most sensible YTMDs I've seen in a while
September 9th, 2006
(0)
yawnsville
September 9th, 2006
(0)
away with you.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
You're real bad at telling jokes.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
this argument is crap, believe what you will.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
I can't prove it, but I would wager that Whetstone is trying to rationalize his membership in an established church. In other words, he's working backward from a foregone conclusion.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
not entertaining
September 9th, 2006
(1)
Good stuff. 4 days of comments and nothing from Whetstone. Definitive victory? Only time will tell.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Whetstone isn't posting comments in this site, but he's updating his site to match.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
5'd for "Good Day."
September 9th, 2006
(0)
good job, i tip my hat
September 9th, 2006
(0)
this is like ":/" cos tbh, I dont care :D Still kudos for proving "OMFG GODS REAL AND IM GONA ENTHRUST IT UPON YOU" people wrong
September 9th, 2006
(0)
OK F*CK! Christians, stop pawning off your religion onto others that don't want it. Non-Believers, don't get so damn bitchy! I'm an atheist, i don't let this sh*t bother me! let YTMND be a site for stupid sh*t and funny stuff, not religous holy wars. GTFO, and take the religous arguments elsewhere. 4 for not pushing any kind of religion at all into this YTMND.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
I like it, but only as it counters stupid christian BS flooding this place
September 9th, 2006
(0)
Pure pwnage.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
The voting has pretty much degraded into whether or not you agree with the basic theory behind the YTMND, not on the actual quality of the work.
September 9th, 2006
(0)
zzzzzzzzzzzz
<< 1 2 >>