all religion is fake
Created on: April 13th, 2007
all religion is fake
All religion is fake. Too many for just one to be right. All based on where you are born in the world/what religion your parents are.

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(2.2) 10 0 13

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 0 0 0 492

Inbound links:

views url
2 http://ytmnsfw.com/users/zerosaiyaman/

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
April 13th, 2007
(2)
atheism is as arrogant as any religion, and just as likely to be wrong.
April 13th, 2007
(0)
ATEIZM LOL
April 13th, 2007
(0)
It's okay, but the Humanist symbol needs to be removed. :P
April 13th, 2007
(0)
humanism is a philosophy, not a religion. dictionaries are good.
April 13th, 2007
(0)
That's like saying there's too many ideas about the way gravity works so they must all be wrong, and it must not work at all XD
April 13th, 2007
(0)
IAWTC, i think all man made religions are false, but saying theres "too many" isnt a good reason. a good reason is that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and no man made religion has provided the evidence to satisfy their claims.
April 13th, 2007
(0)
Actually, there is all sorts of evidence for many things out there, and I say this as a guy getting his Ph.D. in Molecular and Cellular biology. Heck, just take a look at the extraordinary complexity of purine synthesis, or the fact that life requires, pre-resequite, 400 genes no less to be viable. That does not mean all religious claims are right, but there is some very good science in some of them; and self evidence beyond our natural understandings as well seen in the common human condition/daily life.
April 13th, 2007
(0)
In short, religions have their place in human thought, as one method of understanding the world, our relationships to the world and eachother, and our responsibilities there in, which science cannot tell. Science is not all mighty, and only pertains to empirical observations of the natural world. Science is only ever a model to try to explain what we see and predict what we'll see next, yet it never can describe all of reality as we cannot observe nor detect reality absolutely (see the uncertainty priciple)
April 13th, 2007
(0)
Religions are clubs.
April 13th, 2007
(0)
You are correct, but science still can't explain time and mass. Technically, we shall NOT have BEEN-th Made...EVER, but...science states we are here. Me? I believe in...the true power. Not religions. I believe what REALLY made us...Yes, it might really be a god, I'll except that. I will only except what...they, he, she,---"it" communicates. I only believe what is "actually" out there. Highest Logic? Man makes Buildings, Codename:God makes Time and Space.
April 13th, 2007
(0)
in conclusion? I only believe in the Father of Space. I have a father, space has a father. Everything practically has a father that makes it before-hand. Always...Ever...Forever...
April 13th, 2007
(0)
Father of "Space and Time" that is. With space and time....comes everything else.
April 13th, 2007
(0)
then who is the father of the father of space? what extra unheard of dimensions allowed that to exist? you can keep going further and further back, and eventually you have to Specially Plead for something you cant understand. Even atheists admit that ultimately we don't know, a universal agnosticism and acknowledgement of all these possibilites is not mutually exclusive from atheism. belief in the possibilites but dont have a theistic belief in any specific one, manmade or hypothetical? atheist.