Featured Users Seize Control
Created on: June 12th, 2007
Please don't hurt me!
None ( ._.)
Sponsorships:
| user | amount | user | amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| No one has sponsored this site ( ._.) | |||
| Sponsor this site! | Total: $0.00 | Active: $0.00 | |
Vote metrics:
| rating | total votes | favorites | comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| (3.72) | 75 | 5 | 37 |
View metrics:
| today | yesterday | this week | this month | all time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 1,468 |
Inbound links:
| views | url |
|---|---|
| No one has linked to this site. ( ._.) | |
Let me put words to what I'm guessing you're thinking. Even with slavish devotion to fads and "superstar" users who have their crews of sycophants and haters creating an informal tiered userbase, at the very least, we could always rely on the fact that the site itself was totally egalitarian. Now that's changed. If that's not what you're after, feel free to correct me.
It's not that there is suddenly a superclass of users as institutionalized by max that bugs me. I don't have a problem with that, in an Ayn Rand kind of way. What bugs me is that it's based on site views and user-pleasing styles which CLAIM to be egalitarian. If max just came out and made a list of the users he thinks best represent HIS vision, who could argue. But as it stands, the "pinks" have been selected from voting and views that are already flawed. Otherwise inkdrinker would be pink, eh?
Inkdrinker isn't pink? Then I'd have to say there definitely is something rotten in Denmark. I think I predicted this though in a comment under one of the news posts...if I can find it...found it. "Well, a huge flaw I can think of in that department would be users that make good sites, but who just happen to be huge *ssh*les and get downvoted a lot by emos who ran out of razor blades with nothing better to do. lol, e-venge."
Bold
Italic
Underline
Code
User Link
Site Link