VOTE5TMND: It's time to vote 5!
Created on: June 25th, 2007
VOTE5TMND: It's time to vote 5!
VOTE5

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(3.31) 143 10 159

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 2 0 0 3,985

Inbound links:

views url
6 https://www.google.com/
5 http://www.fearfans.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4431&page=2
2 http://www.fearfans.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4431
2 http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&rls=com.microsoft%3Aen-ca%3AIE-SearchBox&rlz=1I7ADRA_en&q=IT%27S+TIME+TO+VOTE+5+ytmnd&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai
1 https://www.google.pl/

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
June 25th, 2007
(-8)
[ comment (and 28 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-8)
5
(-9)
[ comment (and 2 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-9)
5
June 25th, 2007
(-2)
[ comment (and 1 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
5
June 25th, 2007
(-5)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-5)
5
June 25th, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
5
June 25th, 2007
(-6)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-6)
5
(-12)
[ comment (and 2 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-12)
4
(-3)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-3)
5
June 25th, 2007
(-4)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-4)
5
June 25th, 2007
(8)
I HATE YOU ALL.
June 25th, 2007
(14)
Max, you forgot to VOTE5
(1)
I still think you're cool, even if you hate me.
June 25th, 2007
(-1)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
STFU AND VOAT %
June 25th, 2007
(-1)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
win
June 25th, 2007
(5)
Macks hates me uh oh
June 25th, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
YOU BROKE OUR COMBO DAMNIT
June 25th, 2007
(6)
I should use this comment page as a template for who to ban.
June 25th, 2007
(2)
Macks why do you hate things that are funny?
June 25th, 2007
(4)
This is not funny, creative, or intelligent. It's clear little to no time, effort or thought was put into the creation of this site. In fact, from what I can tell, this has no redeeming value at all.
June 25th, 2007
(-1)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
Look around the f*cken community there are sh*t loads of sites that failed to correctly citate or break the terms of service. The poland fad is intentionally breaking those rules and if you want to avoid people from seeing them or warn them, hey theres ytmnsfw, not delete users for pointless reasons.
June 25th, 2007
(8)
The poland fad is worse because when stupid people intentionally break the rules and post garbage sites it's one thing. When users who aren't complete morons post garbage in an attempt to be facetious and then get voted up by others for no other reason than to participate in a circle jerk it's just pollution. YTMNSFW is not for "hiding" anything but to let users decide whether or not they want to see potentially "adult" content.
June 25th, 2007
(9)
oh hey i'm max if i dont think somethings funny then no one should
June 25th, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
Are you saying pollution is caused by people that know some part of what they are doing?
June 25th, 2007
(2)
Even if these sites take little time and effort to make, they're still funny
June 25th, 2007
(2)
99% of the stuff on the front page never gets a laugh out of me. It's stuff like this and the FPA sites that make me love YTMND. Without Polish - type content YTMND would be dead to me.
June 25th, 2007
(8)
Voting five on a site for no other reason than it follows a certain fad or because of the person who created it is pollution. Sites should be voted five when the content merits the highest possible level of achievement. Same goes for a vote of one. When you vote one on a site purely for one reason rather than taking in every aspect of the site, you are polluting as well. You are trying to tell me this site deserves the highest attainable score as well as being added to your list of favorites?
June 25th, 2007
(8)
If I really like it, yeah. Oh and I'm also pretty sure that making this site took more time and effort than doing a google search for Sean Connery and putting his picture to a looping clip of him saying "You're the man now dog"
January 11th, 2011
(-3)
He posted that one time. That picture of Sean Connery with looping audio was the original, while you make bad copy after bad copy of pointless shit.
April 20th, 2011
(3)
lol, pot calling the kettle black
June 25th, 2007
(3)
If its highest rated it means people are going to like it and nothing would please you more than to know the fact that people are going to come back if they like a certain site because they will be expecting more of those kinds of sites. I hate to say it but you dont define "great". "Great" is opinion, and no matter how loud the sound for it is, if people like it and they will come back to it, its great.
June 25th, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
For example if someone spends 10 weeks on a site with the best remixing and photoshop job ever so it looks like a professional movie, but it still doesn't make me laugh or entertain me, I don't give it a good rating. I might give it a few extra stars for effort, but really. If someone just draws a few squiggly lines in MSPaint and puts a 3500Hz square wave for audio with text like "LOLOLOLOLOL" then that makes me laugh. I give that a 5.
June 25th, 2007
(5)
I'm not trying to say my opinion is king, there is plenty of popular content out there that I don't like and don't voice up about. This fad has been done to death and you have an active group of people that upvote each other when they are producing content that consists of the same recycled material over and over and over. There are only so many times you can combine "forgot polend", "jon carry", etc. We got it a year ago.
June 25th, 2007
(3)
Yet we still find it funny. Just because you don't doesn't mean you can automatically label it as "bad"
June 25th, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
To elaborate, there are tons of people who are sick and tired of the Lazytown fad (myself being one of them), yet you don't complain when lazytown sites make the front page or when featured users make them.
June 25th, 2007
(3)
I'm not going to vote up someone who spent 10 weeks on a site if I don't find it particularly funny or original, but if you are telling me a squiggly line and a loud noise is all it takes to make you laugh, how can you not understand why I wouldn't like that? It's not original in any way, and that's what it comes down to. By voting up sites like this you just perpetuate the stagnation.
June 25th, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
You don't have to like it. Neither does anyone else. But I do, and so do other people. We have the right to upvote what we like.
June 25th, 2007
(3)
It's the same as creating a site trying to make a joke about how much black people like fried chicken. Sure, hundreds of YTMND users will think it's hilarious. That doesn't mean it's creative or merits any real attention. It's just simple minded humor that requires no real originality or creativity. You can rag on the original YTMND plenty, it didn't take that much effort, nor was it particularly funny, but it was original. You can't honestly tell me the 4000th incarnation of "YOU FORGOT POLEND LOL" is.
June 25th, 2007
(2)
I see where you're coming from of course, but it goes both ways. For example, personally I can't understand why anyone enjoys "truly outrageous" sites, but people still do.
June 25th, 2007
(1)
Many Polend sites are actually masterfully put together. I suggest you take a look at http://gijorge.ytmnd.com
June 25th, 2007
(-1)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
^Now honestly tell me you didn't at least chuckle at that
June 25th, 2007
(2)
I feel like the difference is even when users make Lazytown sites, there are some that try to bring something new to the table. While there are plenty of them that just rely on the same broken record that is a peodphilia joke, it's possible to create something new and original with any subject matter. I see the FPA a lot like Cthulhu138, they made something funny the first time, and gave up on trying to actually create something new so they continue to stick the same algorithm they were using a year ago.
June 25th, 2007
(-3)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-3)
Max ive seen you delete stuff because YOU didn't like it.
June 25th, 2007
(-4)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-4)
Then you're obviously not getting the joke. We incorporate new sounds, new pictures, new remixes, and new techniques all the time. Take a look at some of the early FPA sites from mid - 2006 and compare them to the FPA sites now. A good way to illustrate the difference is to compare http://vote5sonicpoland.ytmnd.com/ to http://samuraibush.ytmnd.com (I love both of these sites BTW, it's just that you can agree the styles are completely different)
June 25th, 2007
(-3)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-3)
And how do people who make Lazytown sites "bring something new to the table?" It's always "Look here's Stephanie doing something mundane that can be interpreted in a sexual context" or "Look I just photoshopped Stephanie doing something mundane in a sexual context" or "Look here's Stephanie BUT WATCH OUT IT'S BRIAN PEPPERS!" I mean come on. Poland Sites are way more diverse than that.
June 25th, 2007
(3)
i actually agree with max that most new poland sites arent funny anymore, mostly due to lack of originality. but Cthulhu138 is great
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
Well, it looks like we know who forgets polend around here
June 25th, 2007
(-6)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-6)
max, it's time to clear ytmnd and start again. you can only fight the urge for so long.
June 25th, 2007
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
max you should check out a more recent example http://vote5thirtythirtyvisioncanspotpolandforgettergots.ytmnd.com/ of course you probably wont like it, but this type of parody is still funny to me.
June 25th, 2007
(1)
i think max confused this with a poland site. this is vote5tmnd, which has what, 2 other entries?
June 25th, 2007
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
also, i dont see the "redeeming value" of some of max's recent sites. a screenshot of an e-mail you got? a diagram of a moderation system that may never be implemented(how are those t-shirts coming along?) a ytmnd complaining that ytmnd sucks? please. i am ugoff.
June 25th, 2007
(6)
Something is sort of screwed up in my head, and now, genuinely, the only ytmnds I like are ones like this. I've worried that it ends up looking like we're just creating a circle of people and voting 5 on each other's ytmnds so they get more views, but it's definately not what I'm trying to do. I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks like that.
June 25th, 2007
(-2)
5d for max. also i disagree with him
June 25th, 2007
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
After reading AegisReflector's last response, I decided to vote 4 out of pity.
June 26th, 2007
(0)
I personally find most facetious sites funny, including certain poland sites (mainly the old ones by aegisreflector) but I do vote 1 or 2 on many poland sites which do nothing but add poland, poland toolkit sounds, and ear rape
June 26th, 2007
(1)
If a site simply adds poland and ear rape to another site, I'll generally vote 1-3, where, if a site actually points out flaws in another site and expresses them sarcastically, I'll vote 4-5, regardless of whether the site has poland or not
June 26th, 2007
(1)
I definetely like sites by users like MurdarMachene or hamjamt better than most FPA members
June 26th, 2007
(1)
for me, fpa sites have always been about context, aside from the occasional person who might think that it is entirely a non sequitur, fpa, in its many incarnations relies on subtleties of...nevermind... i dont really see the point in arguing over sites, the system allows us to express our opinions in the comment section but the ultimate avenue should remain the voting structure sure, i can see the frustration of people who think fpa is headed (or already arrived) to a place where it is no different from other fads but at the core is still a philosophy of irony..and i think that is something that ytmnd is in dire need of and i vote accordingly
June 26th, 2007
(7)
Cthulhu138's sites are all better than max's BTW.
June 26th, 2007
(-3)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-3)
max gained a ton of respect from me for these comments, and he's absolutely right. For all the garbage about "well if people think it's funny I'll keep posting garbage." Look at the site rating. 3.49. The people have spoken. This isn't funny. This is garbage. Stop making this crap, or at least try to put some effort into making it better.
June 27th, 2007
(-5)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-5)
Hey Max, good to see you trying. I hope people listen. It's simply too easy for any handful of people working together to exploit the freedom offered here, so of course many/most do. I doubt that will ever change. This place somehow remains cool despite that. Ha. Circle jerk. That really does sum it up on every level. Don't it?
June 29th, 2007
(0)
You voted 4 on someone else's site because of pity for me?
July 2nd, 2007
(0)
I am genuinely amused by this site, it has replay value, bottom line. This is my only serious comment on the page.
July 4th, 2007
(4)
NICE OF THE PRINCESS TO INVITE US TO A PICNIC, EH, LUIGI? --- I HOPE SHE MADE LOTS OF SPAGHETTI!
July 4th, 2007
(2)
I'VE HAD IT WITH THEESE MOTHERF*CKING SNAKES ON THIS MOTHERF*CKING PLANE
June 25th, 2007
(2)
Hi, my name is ggg
June 25th, 2007
(-5)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-5)
Sheep.
June 25th, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
Turtle.
June 25th, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
5
June 25th, 2007
(-8)
[ comment (and 1 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-8)
After reading what max had to say....I couldn't agree anymore with him. Vote 1!
June 25th, 2007
(0)
FIVED LOOL
June 25th, 2007
(-2)
[ comment (and 10 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
make less of these and more sites that are actually funny
June 25th, 2007
(-3)
[ comment (and 1 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-3)
This is absolute crap, why are so many people 5'ing this garbage?
June 25th, 2007
(3)
Voting 5 is a game and I just fell for the trap but max refuses to play.
June 25th, 2007
(-7)
[ comment (and 1 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-7)
+ to all of max's comments, for great justice.
June 25th, 2007
(1)
for the record, this made me laugh my *ss off before reading all of the comments
June 26th, 2007
(1)
this cracks me up every time now. fav'd
June 26th, 2007
(1)
LOL
(0)
Oh sh*t there is some serious business up in here.
June 26th, 2007
(-2)
[ comment (and 2 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
"Yet we still find it funny. Just because you don't doesn't mean you can automatically label it as "bad"" - and yet the FPA takes the opposite attitude to every other fad on YTMND. there was a time when FPA sites were unique, creative and one upping each other for noise, or properly parodying other material. that ship has sailed, and it seems (not all, but some) of these people dont have any other ideas on how to annoy or confuse people other than going through the same set of motions they always have.
June 26th, 2007
(1)
LOL
June 26th, 2007
(1)
im voting 5 cause i find this funny and im entitled to vote 5. if you disagree with me thats your opinion, it means sh*t to me.
June 27th, 2007
(1)
This is the most ridiculous bullsh*t I've ever read. Who the f*ck? What the f*ck? Shoover isn't featured anymore because he posted the number five? Is he serious? Who the f*ck is that f*cking f*cked up in the f*cking head? F*cking nazi.
June 27th, 2007
(0)
Hear hear. Also, Max. If FPA circle jerking got people onto the U&C, then President Gandalf Vetoes Legislation, pile of sh*t that it is, wouldn't merit a 4.27
June 28th, 2007
(0)
And I'd have a lot more than two sites rated over 4.
June 28th, 2007
(-1)
hey man, i made you something. i wanted to do it earlier but i had to go to work. http://sorryimafewdayslate.ytmnd.com
June 29th, 2007
(0)
This is a stupid, pointless debate
June 29th, 2007
(-1)
I don't know what max is getting so mad about. I genuinely enjoy this site; I can tell a lot of work was put into it and it made me laugh.
(2)
gotta fav this epic comment page
July 5th, 2007
(0)
Khan's five makes me laugh no matter what.
July 18th, 2007
(-1)
YOU DON'T GET THE JOKE!! THIS SITE FUNNY!!11 gimme a break. this site f*cking sucks
July 22nd, 2007
(-1)
Yay censorship!!
July 23rd, 2007
(-1)
god these sites are so f*cking stupid.
August 5th, 2007
(0)
I am not remotely amused, entertained, interested, or informed by what it is you're trying to do here. You should be ashamed of yourself.
August 5th, 2007
(0)
BOOGADABOOGADABOOGADABOOGADABOOGADABOOGADABOOGADABOOGADABOOGADABOOGADABOOGADABOOGADABOOGADABOOGADABOOGADABOOGADABOOGADABOOGADABOOGADABOOGADABOOGADABOOGADABOOGADABOOGADABOOGADABOOGADA
September 2nd, 2007
(0)
This comment page gets better and better every time I read it!!
October 4th, 2007
(1)
LOL TIME TRAVEL WATCH AS 6 REPLIES WILL COME AT ME.
September 8th, 2008
(-1)
i mother f*cking 5d this sh*t you ignorant *ss n*gg*r
September 9th, 2008
(0)
2008-09-08 22:24:07 > 2007-06-27 02:59:57
April 5th, 2009
(0)
EPIC MAC KS COMMENTS
April 5th, 2009
(-1)
lol these floating khanments make it look like they are replying to me (until someone else posts something)
April 6th, 2009
(0)
He thinks he wants to have gay buttsex with you
(0)
Fav'd for irony.
December 23rd, 2009
(0)
5
February 27th, 2010
(0)
I hope I don't lose featured user status for this! OLOLOL!
January 11th, 2011
(1)
My big regret is that I had NOTHING to do with this comment clusterfuck
January 11th, 2011
(-3)
Another 3 years have passed, and you're still making the same, tired crap.

Only there's a new generation of fucking morons there to upvote you
April 12th, 2011
(2)
Actually the major debate was on Poland sites and hardly anyone, including me, even makes those anymore. So you just proved yourself wrong.
July 15th, 2011
(1)
FAV'd for the comments