Colorism
Created on: July 8th, 2007
Colorism
Those f*cking Pinks.

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(3.87) 119 1 36

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
1 0 0 0 7,365

Inbound links:

views url
1 http://mobilephoneporno3gp.net/1-skorpion-seks-vtroem-dlya-mobil
1 http://replicahandbags.name/
1 http://ytmnsfw.com/users/MadHatterJ/sites
Citations:
User: BillyZane

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
July 8th, 2007
(-3)
-1 for discriminatin'
July 15th, 2007
(0)
It'd actually be a useful thing if only the window of oppourtunity for new people / unknowns was wider for them to be noticed. Now it's just put into the ten seconds before 1:15 am.
July 8th, 2007
(10)
indeed, i personally think that the box should just be a collection of thier older sites (much like worthwhile) and certainly not a revolving retarded symphony of self aggrandizement...i also sincerly hope that they are reviewed and their population is drastically culled at regular intervals...all he really had to do was create the list and then allow for all YTMNDs to show the name of the creater on the home page...i can think of at least 5 ways in which the feature would function better than it does now
July 8th, 2007
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
uh
July 8th, 2007
(3)
If i could cast votes for testicular fortitude shown by people who sponsor their own sites, even more so those knowing very well the consequences of their actions the following full week of "internet attention" and the insults directed towards he or she that deliberately went against the public status quo, I would surely vote a 5; especially with the $4.55 amount, which is clearly the price of a 32 pack of keystone light. As for the site itself, it fails to meet my personal standards, which aren't very high
July 8th, 2007
(-1)
Worth every cent.
July 15th, 2007
(0)
Money well spent. :)
July 8th, 2007
(0)
poignant.
July 8th, 2007
(-6)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-6)
*Throw sh*t at you* no, just no.
(0)
Poor poor pinks
July 10th, 2007
(0)
georgia, georgiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
July 10th, 2007
(1)
so true...featured users shouldnt have their own list of sites cuz 98% of their sites suck!
July 10th, 2007
(0)
oops..forgot to 5 it :P
July 12th, 2007
(0)
five. simply.
July 12th, 2007
(0)
Since when did anyone care about how anyone was treated on YTMND? The only one anyone should care about is Max, because he's the one who runs this site.
July 13th, 2007
(0)
crazyness
July 14th, 2007
(0)
So true.
July 14th, 2007
(0)
yes
July 14th, 2007
(0)
Sight
July 14th, 2007
(0)
MadHatter is a wise an noble prophet.
July 14th, 2007
(2)
and is handsome.
July 14th, 2007
(0)
agreed
July 14th, 2007
(0)
winner. you won pink.
July 14th, 2007
(0)
Why does ytmnd take itself so seriously...
July 15th, 2007
(1)
why don't you leave?
July 14th, 2007
(0)
STOP RUBBING IT IN
July 14th, 2007
(-1)
uhhhh... what?
July 14th, 2007
(0)
Always tryin to keep the red people down.... REVOLUCION!! THE TIME IS NOW!
July 14th, 2007
(2)
2 in the pink and one in the stink
July 15th, 2007
(0)
funny... i think i see where you are going with this...
July 15th, 2007
(0)
I believe i will give this five stars, mostly because it's an accurate statement. Also, I believe if the man had not indeed sponsored his own site then it would have been alt downvoted into nothingness. It's a message to be heard, not forgotten. When will YTMND go back to it's humble roots and leave this madness behind? A featured user could create a page with nothing but a used condom and a beer can with a cigarette butt in it and everyone would go, "Oh, wow! That's simply amazing! I give it five stars!".
July 16th, 2007
(0)
I want to test this theory.
July 15th, 2007
(0)
We're all pink on the inside.
July 16th, 2007
(0)
While I agree, this helps them, I dont really see how it exactly hurts others. Fact of the matter is, the featured user section is pretty reliable for good sites, so as far as im concerned, as long as a pinky doesn't spam ytmnd with sh*t, idc.
July 16th, 2007
(0)
hey.. who really cares?
November 11th, 2007
(0)
Brilliant!