Add a comment

Thankfully, we can negative his assclown comments.

eh, darthwang looks at most of the sites he votes on I'm pretty sure. It's really his vote and you should let him have it. If somebody votes for hillary that means that they're automatically evil? No, that's their vote, you make disagree with it but it is their vote. I hate hillary though and she can die in a fire.

The guy has over 9,000 upvotes. Almost a 9:1 downvote ratio. give him that credit at least.

more like awesome sites.

If DarthWang is what is wrong with ytmnd, I so f*cking don't want to see the douchebag community this place would be if it were "fixed": 217,618 users typing "LOL!!!111one OMG U WIN!" for every goddamn rip of a movie or commercial with three people riding in a car with Haddaway playing, every half assed 8-bit rendition of some song that came out ten years before most of you kids were even born, every stolen sprite animation, every screen shot of some post at a WoW forum... Must I go on?

Green, I don't think referencing a particular user who hands out 1's to any site that doesn't contain noise in any way advances one's argument on the quality of YTMND material

I thought you were allowed to vote according to your own schema. If you don't like a site and you want to vote 1, that's your prerogative. Multiple accounts are against the rules, but I don't see any accusations of that sort of business. The one thing that is quite obvious is that a vote cannot "ruin" a site, as the rating has nothing to do with the site, it cannot change the image or the sound, and is merely a sorting tool which is determined by the aggregate of the voters' scores, including 1's and 5's.

"If you think what DarthWang does is admirable and "better" (snobbily leaving just the number of stars he gave a site in his comments with no constructive criticism whatsoever, and giving out auto-1's and auto-5's based on the USER) then you don't have credibility enough to tell us what's wrong with YTMND. They're both problems. Deal with it." He gives out 1s and 5s based on user? Really? I guess observation means nothing.

2007-10-14 03:31:29 Shaolinwind2 3 stars lol ... Shaolinwind2's comment is not constructive. It is merely a reflection of how he feels. Let's leave a 20 comment long thread debating the merits of his constructive commentary. THIS IS A COMMENT SECTION, NOT A CONSTRUCTIVE COMMENT SECTION! Be tolerant of all styles of comments. They are all welcome. Alt account voting is not within the rules, but who really cares? Voting on ytmnd is a sorting system, and a poor one. Nothing more.

C-C-COMBO BREAKER. Sort of. Cos' there was a sucession of comments focusing on one thing but now YTMND has been singlehandedly destroyed by me posting this comment. Oh geez, looks like I have to get to Mrs. Getzman's fifth grade class now, be back later!

1

Sestet's the only one that's got it moderately right. All the rest of you can go to hell, as far as I'm concerned, because you're all wrong on a level I thought previously unattainable.

LOL I JUST NOTICED YOU GUYS WERE TALKING ABOUT ME. Well anyway, leaving a comment is better than just voting without commenting, like most people do. From watching spy I would say that only about 10% of people who vote don't even comment, so why don't you blame them for "not leaving constructive criticism?" As for "voting on sites based on the users", I've upvoted some Fourest sites, so that should tell you something.

If I was a no lifer who had never been parties before, I wouldn't understand the humor in sharpie on someone's face either

Did I call that or what