Remember the 5th of November
Created on: November 2nd, 2007
Remember the 5th of November
Join us this November 5th for the largest one day political donation event in history. The goal is to bring together 100,000 people to donate $100 each, creating a one day donation total of $10,000,000.

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(2.86) 204 3 267

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 0 0 0 12,121

Inbound links:

views url
52 https://www.bing.com
5 http://216.18.188.175:80
4 http://www.google.com.hk
3 http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/
2 https://www.google.com/

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
<< 1 2 >>
November 2nd, 2007
(0)
[ comment (and 6 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
Remember, remember, the Fifth of November....
November 2nd, 2007
(-3)
[ comment (and 109 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-3)
I believe in public goods, which means I believe in taxes. I also believe in the law of diminishing returns, so I believe that taxes should be levied higher according to your income. Boo for people who claim that lowering taxes solves all problems.
(2)
Quick! someone lone me 100 bucks!
November 3rd, 2007
(1)
If the income tax completely disappeared, the government's revenue would still be above its revenue in 2000. Scary?
November 3rd, 2007
(3)
When he doesn't win, i am going to donate to this site.
November 3rd, 2007
(3)
Looking at the other candidates, ytmnd is the only alternative to Ron Paul, yes ;)
November 3rd, 2007
(-11)
[ comment (and 3 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-11)
Bush 08
November 3rd, 2007
(-4)
[ comment (and 2 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-4)
Campaigning on teh internetz is like competing in the Special Olympics... in front of a stadium full of your fellow competitors.
November 3rd, 2007
(5)
Also, Ron Paul is such a stupid nationalist. What kind of "libertarian" (despite the R next to his name, he is essentially a libertarian candidate) wants to spend government money to randomly make the market more inefficient by building a border fence. Plus, his fervent isolationism is ficking creepy. A Ron Paul administration would solidify the tradition of the US government sitting on its *ss while genocide, starvation, and disease kill millions.
November 3rd, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
So, it's the DUTY of the US to care about 5bn people?
November 4th, 2007
(0)
By sacrificing yourself? Who gains from that? The main problem in the world is not genocide, food and disease but corruption and despotism. If you want to help the world then make the US a beacon of freedom and purpose as an example for others. Most countries in the world compare themselves with the US, if the US moves down, they move down as well.
November 4th, 2007
(0)
^ What you talkin bout Willis?
November 5th, 2007
(0)
Do you think the U.N. - where various dictatorships are represented - can do a better job than the U.S.?
November 6th, 2007
(1)
Dictators that don't invade other countries on false pretenses are better than our president who can go to war without due process.
November 6th, 2007
(0)
Well, if you continue to vote for people who support the wars, yes. Concerning the front runners only Ron Paul wants to end the war. Clinton wants to stay in Iraq until 2013.
November 6th, 2007
(0)
"It's the duty of human beings to care about your fellow human beings." Yes, on a VOLUNTEER basis, not through coercion and force. By the way, Americans per capita are the most generous people in the world. And in the most legitimate sense: VOLUNTEER donation.
November 12th, 2007
(0)
I like Yiff, too!
November 3rd, 2007
(3)
knock it off with this ron paul bullsh*t. he's a f*cking moron. no one wants to vote for him.
November 3rd, 2007
(8)
Interesting to see so much viral support for this candidate. Too bad most YTMNDers can't even vote yet.
November 3rd, 2007
(0)
[ comment (and 1 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
5'd for Ron Paul. I am gonna donate on that day. :D
November 3rd, 2007
(1)
obama n*gg*z fo lyfe
November 3rd, 2007
(6)
I would, but Call of Duty 4 comes out that same day... And the $60 is worth it, because I'll defend America's values myself, dammit.
November 3rd, 2007
(5)
1'd for not being about V for Vendetta "Remember remember the 5th of November, the Gunpowder Treason and Plot. I know of no Reason the gunpowder Treason should ever be forgot."
November 4th, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
The 5th of November is not the day of the gunpowder plot but of the highest donation in history :>
November 6th, 2007
(0)
V for wow what a sh*tty movie
November 8th, 2007
(0)
Clawg you're only hurting Ron Paul's credibility, even if you are helping pump a few extra dollars into his campaign. Now, less bullsh*t from you and more talk of gunpowder destruction! Remember the 5th of November, when a government building was almost turned into glorious ember.
November 3rd, 2007
(0)
he wont win, but he will steal the votes from people who can. Although some things he says he cannot and willnot win. What a shame, be best is he didn't run...or another George W. Bush will take office, and another 4 years of hell we will be enjoying...sigh
November 3rd, 2007
(0)
"Although some things he says I agree with I'd rather wish he didn't run" Is what I meant to say. Also this is not funny :(
November 4th, 2007
(-2)
You wish he didn't run so that you wouldn't see how bad the other choices are?
November 7th, 2007
(1)
He's saying Ron Paul is undermining the Democrat vote, much like Ralph Nader was accused of doing in the 2000 election. It's a matter of choosing the lesser of two evils (not in the literal sense).
November 3rd, 2007
(-2)
*yawn*
November 3rd, 2007
(0)
u no that im in
November 4th, 2007
(1)
MORE LIKE REMEMBER NOVEMBER 5TH, THE RED-LETTER DATE IN THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE!
November 4th, 2007
(0)
freedom!!!!!!!!
November 4th, 2007
(0)
Word.
November 4th, 2007
(2)
remember remember the waste of 13.81 on this site.
November 4th, 2007
(1)
I think donating money to ytmnd is a good thing, I like the creativity here :>
November 4th, 2007
(0)
remember, remember, the 11th of september. :[
November 4th, 2007
(1)
(its when my puppy died) </3
November 5th, 2007
(1)
lol change your name to rudolph
November 4th, 2007
(-1)
F*CK
November 4th, 2007
(0)
As a supporter of Ron Paul, f*ck your shameless advertising.
November 4th, 2007
(-1)
i support ron paul. anything to keep the demotwits out of office. kill all n*gg*rs
November 4th, 2007
(-3)
Remember the 20th of November instead, the day where we spend all our money on Mass Effect and similar awesome titles. But screw Halo 3. Also, Obama rulz.
November 5th, 2007
(-1)
Clawg needs to clog his f*cking *ssh*le with a hard, giant c*ck.
November 5th, 2007
(0)
Yours?
November 5th, 2007
(1)
Luckily we won't have to hear any more about this *ssh*le after he loses in the primaries. Go to bed, morons.
November 5th, 2007
(-1)
1.6mio$ and still 12 hours to go :)
November 5th, 2007
(-1)
More like 1.8 million
November 5th, 2007
(-1)
2mio$
November 6th, 2007
(-1)
4.2mio$
November 5th, 2007
(0)
[ comment (and 1 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
America needs to sh*t on Ron Paul's tits
November 5th, 2007
(1)
Political craptmnd instant -1
November 5th, 2007
(-1)
lol, America.
November 5th, 2007
(1)
Speaking of the man: http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/016622.html http://ronpaulgraphs.com/yesterday_vs_today_line.html
November 5th, 2007
(1)
the5thofnov.ytmnd.com
November 5th, 2007
(1)
V for Vendetta FTW.
November 5th, 2007
(0)
No
November 5th, 2007
(2)
DANSON 08
November 5th, 2007
(2)
I thought this would be for V for Vendetta.
November 6th, 2007
(0)
I wish it were.
November 5th, 2007
(0)
Ron Paul FTW!! All other candidates=EPIC FAIL!
November 5th, 2007
(0)
I'm voting for Paul Ron, the radical socialist Democrat.
November 5th, 2007
(0)
Anyone who wants to abolish the Federal Reserve has my vote. People voting otherwise need to go to www.zeitgeist.com and learn a few things.
November 5th, 2007
(0)
Where's Hugo Weaving and John Hurt?
November 6th, 2007
(2)
I hate you political psychos who think this wacko is a good idea. Abraham Lincoln and FDR frown upon you and your sh*tc*ckery.
November 6th, 2007
(-2)
F*ck em'.
November 6th, 2007
(2)
Lincoln didn't actually care about the slaves. He violated habeas corpus. He violated the constitution. He imprisoned political opponents. He violated the rights of states to legally remove themselves from the Union. Free countries don't force others to be members of them.
November 6th, 2007
(-1)
FDR's plans were disasters. His price control schemes only led to product shortages, due to the fact that people scrambled to buy things below market value. Social Security, which he used to get easy votes, turned out to be a financial mess. There is more money going out than coming in. Even the modern democrats admit that it is a problem. The Great Depression never ended while he was president. Many economists say that his policies only made things worse. http://tinyurl.com/2qocqf
November 10th, 2007
(0)
Actually, Social Security is a financial mess because LBJ opened its funding up for use outside of its intended purpose in order to further fund the Vietnam conflict, which basically took the "Security" out of "Social Security". Once the war ended, the government found it rather liked having the extra money to throw around and so they never put it back the way it was. If they'd quit taking money out of Social Security to pay for other programs, it would be working just fine.
November 6th, 2007
(1)
lol ron paul
November 6th, 2007
(0)
Hooooooope for Amaraca.
November 6th, 2007
(0)
And it's such an empty trope to paint the unemployed as lazy untermenschen and all the wealthy as glorious, hard-working heroes who embody all that is ethically Good simply because they have made (or inherited) a ton of money.
November 6th, 2007
(0)
Not to mention the almost laughable idea that wealthy people are suffering so much because of Evil Taxes, they can't enjoy any of their gains. They're suffering more than you and me, just because they're superior to us...
November 6th, 2007
(1)
it's the 6th, too late
November 6th, 2007
(1)
Though I really admire Paul for his willingness to stand alone in the Republican debates and sandblast the other candidates for their obsession with their pet war, while they all see how many times they can reference 9/11 and the Fox commentators laugh at him like drunken sports announcers.
November 6th, 2007
(-1)
"or like having a functioning economy..." Yes, I REALLY like a functioning economy, which is why the Federal Reserve should be shut down, taxes should be reduced, corporate welfare and privileges should be ended, and meddlesome bureaucrats removed from office. It has been proven by many economists that there should be as little government intervention as possible (with perhaps the exception of enforcing against fraud, larceny and contract violations). The silly 'progressive' ideas, along with the income tax and federal reserve, led to the great depression. The long discredited 'Keynesian Economics' policies led to the recession of the 1970's. And communism, as you know (well, maybe not you), fell apart, due to misallocation of resources, too much debt, inflationary currency and economic stagnation. And now, our country has the highest amount of government spending as percentage of GDP (44%), yet more people are going below the poverty line, with rising inequality. Well, imagine that. 0/4
November 6th, 2007
(0)
whoops, double post from above
November 6th, 2007
(2)
lol homosex
November 7th, 2007
(1)
I'll donate if Ron Paul blows up a monument. Otherwise, screw it.
November 9th, 2007
(0)
LMFAO
November 7th, 2007
(-2)
The amount of stupidity in these replies amazes me. Hey guys, the Income Tax is used to pay off the debt created by the Federal Reserve. The Income Tax is NOT used for roads, education, welfare, roads, schools, medicare, social security, border security, or anything of the like. NOT A PENNY! Please watch Aaron Russo's America: Freedom to Facism. Take the time to do this. It is not a waste of your time. You are victim of propaganda. Nothing you pay in federal income taxes are for your benefit! Not one!
November 7th, 2007
(-2)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1656880303867390173&q=freedom+to+fascism&pr=goog-sl http://tinyurl.com/2j55vr
November 7th, 2007
(1)
RuPaul, ha ha ha
November 7th, 2007
(0)
November 7th, 2007
(1)
This song is so gay.
November 9th, 2007
(0)
I don't know, I wiped away a single tear when I thought about how much Ron Paul cares about America. .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... j/k this song is gay.
November 7th, 2007
(0)
THE MARKET DEMANDS IT
November 8th, 2007
(0)
You only like Ron Paul because he is anti-War. Other than his stance on the war he is so far right that he could almost be considered an isolationist. He will be this decade's Ross Perot, and could likely tip the scales in favor of the Traitorcrat candidate were he to run as an Indy which is what Soros and the Code Pink crowd are pushing for... Also c*cks.
November 8th, 2007
(1)
He is NOT far right. He stands up powerfully for free speech, for drug legalization, AGAINST a police state rather than FOR, he is a POWERFUL supporter of civil liberties, FOR habeus corpus, AGAINST the death penalty, AGAINST torture, AGAINST wiretapping, AGAINST the patriot act, FOR allowing the states to have gay marriage, AGAINST a constitutional amendment barring flag desecration, AGAINST school mandated prayer, AGAINST corporate welfare, AGAINST the defense industry, AGAINST national ID cards...
November 8th, 2007
(0)
These are all issues that are associated with the left. Next time, do some research.
November 8th, 2007
(0)
Finally, there is nothing wrong with bringing the troops home. In fact, it would be extremely beneficial. Our soldiers are literally in 130 nations across the world, even in nations that have not experienced war in over 50 or more years. Why should we protect wealthy nations like Germany or Japan against non-existent enemies? Why should we send our soldiers to nations to oust a leader, simply because we do not agree with his political views? Suppose other nations did that to us? What would you think?
November 8th, 2007
(0)
Finally, bringing the troops home and stopping this world police nonsense is not even CLOSE to far right. You are so way off base on this one. Noam Chomsky, Ralph Nader and Gore Vidal, people who are all well associated with the left, have all espoused these views. You really got to STOP WATCHING FOX NEWS.
November 8th, 2007
(1)
Giving money to a politician on Guy Fawke day? Thats kinda the opposite thing your suppose to do. You are suppose to stand up to all politicians and make them realize that they are ruled by us.
November 8th, 2007
(1)
agree. but i wouldn't bother, these guys don't understand logic. it's a lost cause.
November 9th, 2007
(-1)
Well, most of what Ron Paul is planning to do is to reverse the things other politicians have done.
November 10th, 2007
(0)
I am of the mind that Americans no longer have the ability to carry out a revolution. The Federal government has grown too powerful.
November 8th, 2007
(2)
Voting 5 just to piss off Korf after his remarkably pedestrian arguments against libertarianism
November 10th, 2007
(0)
I was actually arguing for the mere existence of such things as public goods. I can see how you would get confused by mr. irrelevant tangent, however.
November 8th, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
No.
November 8th, 2007
(0)
Additionally, what the f*ck are you people rambling about?
November 9th, 2007
(0)
your life
November 8th, 2007
(0)
You're not... serious...right?
November 9th, 2007
(0)
1'd for faving your own site and sponsoring it sh*thole.
November 9th, 2007
(0)
http://thisnovember11th.com/ <- next money bomb, go for it :)
November 9th, 2007
(1)
I thought this was a V for Vendetta YTMND. I was duped! End the IRS? I hope ROn Paul has an army of Clonetroopers.
November 9th, 2007
(0)
The IRS will cease to exist when the 16th amendment is repealed (which wasn't even ratified by 3/4 of the states in the first place).
November 9th, 2007
(0)
Heh heh. Whatever. Who gives a sh*t.
November 9th, 2007
(0)
Also check out altruism.ytmnd.com :)
November 9th, 2007
(0)
Ron Paul? Ron Paul can burn. I hate him and all his supporters.
November 9th, 2007
(0)
Also, 1'd because no one gives a sh*t about Ron Paul.
November 9th, 2007
(-1)
Politics and YTMND never mixed well...ever. Plenty of people believe what Rupert Murdoch tells them though. If Hilary is elected I'm leaving the United States.
November 10th, 2007
(0)
I hear that. Sometimes I forget she's a woman...
November 11th, 2007
(-1)
If Ron Paul is elected I'm moving to the US ;D
November 9th, 2007
(0)
lol
November 9th, 2007
(0)
All I know is if Hillary is elected I'm going to go kill alot of people, but not with a gun, with an egg slicer, noone will expect it. Also, VOTE RUDY
November 10th, 2007
(1)
A vote for Rudy is a vote for Hillary. A vote for Hillary is a vote for Rudy.
November 9th, 2007
(0)
F*CKING RUN PAUL BULLSH*T!!! UNEDUCATED IDIOTS!!! STFU!!!
November 10th, 2007
(0)
Uneducated? Does that mean you have the ability to prove the claims on this page to be wrong? I seriously doubt it, considering you don't even know how to turn off your caps lock key.
November 9th, 2007
(0)
terrible
November 9th, 2007
(0)
hint: the top 5 nations on the planet didn't get there through libertarianism. They're social democratic welfare states.
November 10th, 2007
(0)
The top 5 nations, or the 5 nations that you like best? Because if you look at the statistics, you will see that the nations with the fastest growing GDP's, the highest median income averages, the greatest amount of economic freedom, the lowest taxes for the average citizen, the lowest costs of living aren't social democratic welfare states. The only reason why leftists say that social democratic nations are superior is because of all the 'free' stuff people get from government.
November 10th, 2007
(-1)
In actuality, these states have sluggish economies, that barely grow at all, or are beginning to shrink. In 20 to 40 years from now, these 'social democratic' states are no longer going to be able to pay for their welfare programs and other 'free' stuff they give to the people. The reason? Their populations are shrinking. There will be fewer young people able to pay for the programs with their tax revenue. Try looking at statistics before making claims.
November 10th, 2007
(1)
No I mean ones that are not only ranked #1 by international agencies, but are also considered the best by the vast majority of people on the planet. Norway, Sweden, Finland, Netherlands and Denmark. Better education, more equality, less obesity, virtually no crime, smarter populations, excellent transportation, virtually no corruption, strong multi-party democracy, virtually no religious superstition. It's very difficult to find a single advantage the US has anymore. Their populations are growing too.
November 10th, 2007
(-1)
You should check your facts more closely. Education: Finland does well because they allow their schools to compete, each school can heavily influence its curriculum. Other countries like germany do much worse. Also look at the ranking of universities, in the top 100 you will find mostly US universities. Transportation: That might have something to do with the number of people / square mile. Besides, roads are in the hand of the government, right? Equality: Well... you might be right, lol
November 10th, 2007
(-1)
There is also a 'happiness index', the US ranks among the top when you do not include the 'environment footprint'. Same goes for lifespan. And about the 'multi-party democracy': There is ALWAYS a two-party system, consisting of one coalition and the opposition. Smarter population: Obviously not. Corruption: There is a "corruption perceptions index", the US ranks at the top20 as well. Religion: I agree. Crime: less crime, yes, but not "virtually no crime".
November 10th, 2007
(2)
Universities are not education. Education means "Educating the populace" not "Educating the elite members of the populace". Higher Education, yes, the US is tops. However, our education system is severely flawed and, yes, Belgium and Finland allow their schools to compete which does help, but that's not a libertarian/socialist thing. In fact, they are public schools so it is more of a socialist program than a libertarian program.
November 10th, 2007
(2)
Public transit is much better inside urban areas in those other countries as well. NYC is one of the only places in the US with a comparable public transportation system, and you can see what the lack of one does to American cities (Bay Area, LA, SD are horrible). About "multi-party republics": Presidential democracies will always have a 2 party system (except in rare cases where a 3rd party either overtakes one party or f*cks up one party and dies off (see: Ralph Nader, Ross Perot).
November 10th, 2007
(2)
Parliamentary democracies elect their president from within, so if you elect a green party member to Parliament your representative will vote for the candidate who most matches his or her political leanings which likely will match your political leanings rather than throwing away your vote (doubly so with the electoral college) in a Presidential election on a candidate that doesn't have a chance to win enough states.
<< 1 2 >>