Ron Paul 2008
Created on: December 22nd, 2007
Ron Paul 2008
ron paul 2008 vote in primary elections

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(2.89) 279 13 487

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 2 0 0 18,981

Inbound links:

views url
3 http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/
1 http://www.zero-charisma.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=598&start=105
1 http://www.ytmnsfw.com/users/calicocool1/favorites
1 http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?72337-Ron-Paul-ad-with-over-10-000-page-views-needs-a-*small*-contribution
1 http://news.google.com/

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
<< 1 2 >>
December 22nd, 2007
(1)
no thanx
December 23rd, 2007
(-9)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-9)
you prefer authoritarianism. ok then.
December 24th, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
mariostar is a c*ckf*g.
December 25th, 2007
(1)
Maybe he just isn't going to vote for a republican.
December 25th, 2007
(-3)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-3)
pendejo(s).
December 25th, 2007
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
The colors should better represent his sexuality; MAKE IT A RAINBOW.
December 25th, 2007
(-9)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-9)
RON PAUL SUXORZ. EVEN ANONYMOUS ONLY DONATED $0.67!
December 26th, 2007
(-4)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-4)
wow dasuber-whatever. that's like saying "if you didn't vote for bush you voted for the terrorists". mentalities like this further cement my hatred of the republican party. oh, and f*ck ron paul.
December 26th, 2007
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
at least Mario Star is polite.
December 26th, 2007
(4)
i'm a c*ckf*g? self-sponsorship, now that's f*ggish behavior. ;)
December 27th, 2007
(6)
sex with ron paul
December 27th, 2007
(8)
vote KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN PAUL 2008
January 1st, 2008
(4)
RP 2008
January 2nd, 2008
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
Ron Pauls ideology seems flawed to me... I dont understand what makes people so fascinated with him. Still, he's a better candidate than Hillary or Obama, lol
January 3rd, 2008
(0)
I actually like Bill Richardson the best out of every candidate, however the problem is from the looks of the polls hes probably not going to win.
January 3rd, 2008
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
Who the f*ck is ron paul?
January 4th, 2008
(1)
Well... Here is the deal. If Clinton, Obama, or Edwards get elected we won't be in bad shape, but if Mitt, Huck, or Guliani get elected then were up sh*t creek! Thats why I'm voting for RP in the primaries. Mostly because he's the only republican thats not if a douche. If he wins the primaries but doesn't win the main election. No big whoop, but if Mitt, Huck, or Guli win then you know what they are going to do. Pretty much what GWB did.
January 4th, 2008
(0)
Secondly, don't you realize that Ron Paul is the only cannidate that voted against the war in Iraq and the PATRIOT Act? Have you been flying lately? I'm sure the Patriot act is the biggest impact on all our lives. I don't give a sh*t who you are, but that bill was pure evil in its intentions and applications. So get a bit pragmatic and realize what is going on.
January 4th, 2008
(-1)
Let me put this straight: Social issues > Economics. Always more important. And by social issues I mean liberal social issues, for me at least. Ron Paul is pretty much neutral on all social issues, so hes kinda stagnant to me. Hillary and Obama, and well any of the other Democrats I can think of, will make us look better to the rest of the world. Ron Paul will make us look better foreign policy-wise, but his economics will send us back to the 19th-century.
January 5th, 2008
(2)
Barack Obama N*GG*!
January 6th, 2008
(1)
I know believe Borack Obama is going to win this election even if the whole poulation of the U.S. votes for Ron Paul.
December 22nd, 2007
(1)
Just say YES to Liberty!
December 23rd, 2007
(-7)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-7)
I'll just say NO to crackpots like Ron Paul!
December 23rd, 2007
(1)
I'll say no to humorless cranks like HerbSewell.
December 24th, 2007
(1)
just say yes to EPIC freedom, http://tropicalfreedom.ytmnd.com/
December 24th, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
^ retarded
December 24th, 2007
(0)
sneaky, un-EPIC east german ^
December 24th, 2007
(0)
You want epic? I'll give you EPIC: http://youtube.com/watch?v=EI_8a5DUaJY
December 25th, 2007
(-5)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-5)
Ron Paul a crackpot? I don't think so? Someone who will let dumbasses like them just mind their own business? I do think so.
December 27th, 2007
(0)
Epic? That's not reggae, man.
December 27th, 2007
(0)
Reggae puts people to sleep
January 3rd, 2008
(0)
"European Liberals complain more about Israel than they do about Saudi Arabia!" There's nothing actually liberal about those people. They are a bunch of vicious political hacks who make every effort to silence the opposition, and arrogantly look down on those who differ. Thanks to those people, the word 'liberal' has come to mean the exact opposite of what it actually meant.
December 22nd, 2007
(-12)
[ comment (and 12 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-12)
Wasted effort, this site is full of commies and zionists.
December 22nd, 2007
(-1)
[ comment (and 1 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
JOHN CONNOR 2008!
December 23rd, 2007
(1)
Woot! I know the singer xD
December 23rd, 2007
(-1)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
mastersitsu 2008
December 23rd, 2007
(2)
VOAT FIEV FOR OBAMA
December 23rd, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
LOL! Spoken like so many democrat supporters! (except those for Kucinich+Gravel)
December 26th, 2007
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
Democrats are retarded. Enjoy your socialism->economic collapse and trampled rights...
December 26th, 2007
(2)
It seems like all the reasons I used to support democrats erode more and more. I at one time thought they were cool, because I thought they were the party of Cheech and Chong, Timothy Leary and Hunter S. Thompson. Now, it becomes more evident that they are really the party of the crabby old lady who always shows up at town hall to scream obscenities.
December 27th, 2007
(0)
CARRRRRRRRRIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
January 2nd, 2008
(0)
"Democrats are retarded. Enjoy your socialism->economic collapse and trampled rights..." Ah yes... for a candle burns, and tears roll down lady liberty's cheeks for the oppressed Swedes.
January 3rd, 2008
(0)
While I don't agree with 100% socialism saying it collapses economies is utterly retarded. Chile, Norway, Sweden, and others are thriving now. Granted it depends on the country, and fast implementing a Socialistic economy on par with those countries in the US might be a bad idea.
December 23rd, 2007
(4)
That retard isn't going to be the Republican candidate and everyone with at least half a brain knows it.
December 26th, 2007
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
The reason this "retard" isnt going to be the Republican cannidate is that everyone with at least half a brain isn't a registered republican
December 23rd, 2007
(3)
f*ck ron paul. ^^
December 23rd, 2007
(1)
stfu
December 23rd, 2007
(1)
a candidate who is anti-choice on the abortion rights issue does not represent "freedom" and "liberty" - he wants the government controlling reproductive behavior. No thanks to the government in our bedrooms.
December 23rd, 2007
(-5)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-5)
So it is perfectly okay to murder babies?
December 23rd, 2007
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
He's been a doctor for like 50 years, and he's delivered over 4,000 babies. Furthermore, he was responsible for the legal rights that those unborn children had, which oddly, seem to dissappear the moment the word abortion is used. Long story short, he's not against abortion because he's against free choice or women's rights, but because from a biological standpoint, he beleives it is a loss of life, me and my biology degree are inclined to agree.
December 23rd, 2007
(7)
"No thanks to the government in our bedrooms." Last time I checked, people weren't performing abortions in their own bedrooms, and it was hardly a private practice. It's simply mass-produced, socially-acceptable murder.
December 23rd, 2007
(7)
I personally respect both sides of the issue, and find it difficult to firmly swing either way.
December 23rd, 2007
(-1)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
You are entitled to your opinions and so is Ron Paul. It is just misleading to say he is the candidate for "freedom" and "liberty" when he wants to take legal rights away and have the government intrude into people's reproductive behavior, i.e. "the bedroom."
December 24th, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
chuft, he would NOT make abortion illegal. He would leave it up to the states to decide. PER THE CONSTITUTION.
December 25th, 2007
(-1)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
Certain human rights cannot be trampled upon by the states, PER THE CONSTITUTION. Obviously he would not want to leave it to the states except as a means to an end, since it is a federal right at the moment.
December 26th, 2007
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
"chuft, he would NOT make abortion illegal. He would leave it up to the states to decide. PER THE CONSTITUTION." states are forced to follow the supreme law of the land, and the 9th amendment protects abortion rights (as ruled by the supreme court, the final arbiter AS PER THE CONSTITUTION). go support states' sovereignity on a neo-confederate forum.
December 26th, 2007
(0)
^ argument ad-hominem
December 26th, 2007
(3)
Early term abortion is fine, but why do so many bitches wait until the baby's brain begins to develop? At that point it's murder - unless they have a serious health issue and having the baby puts them at risk. Ban late term abortion.
December 29th, 2007
(-2)
If a fetus is a person, and said person is about to be aborted, then let this person stand and tell us not to abort him. Otherwise, the fetus is part of the mother, and as such, it's the mother's choice.
December 29th, 2007
(0)
man I love to dna test criminals, it works so well, don't you agree?
December 31st, 2007
(0)
^ yeah, just ask O.J. Simpson
January 1st, 2008
(1)
madDog, the OP means that Ron Paul supposedly supports individual choice, but he wants the government to legislate on moral issues.
January 1st, 2008
(0)
"supports individual choice" does not necessarily mean that you can necessarily do whatever you want to people, now does it? Should you have the right to murder people? Should you have the right to rob the bank? Should you have the right to mug old ladies?
January 2nd, 2008
(0)
"Should you have the right to murder people? Should you have the right to rob the bank? Should you have the right to mug old ladies?" read up on political philosophy: libertarianism adheres to the liberal school of philosophy (liberterianism = neoliberalism), thus all of those three intricate issues are NOT moral issues - they are property issues. Murder is desecration of property. Robbing a bank is theft of property. Mugging is theft of property.
January 3rd, 2008
(0)
Ron Paul is just for freedom overall. When he says he is personally opposed to certain things he tends to always say "Let the states decide". While I admire his willing to not force his views on people, his policies are so utterly loose it will make the USA uncoordinated and "out of whack", so to speak. He will turn us from the United States of America to the Incoherent States of America.
January 3rd, 2008
(0)
By the way if anyone wants my opinion on abortion I'm an undecided fence-sitter; it creates a moral dilemma for me. Though if a strong wind were to blow parallel to say fence, I'd fall on the Pro-Choice side.
(-1)
human cells > Crack Hores who can't keep their legs crossed.
January 6th, 2008
(0)
kill babies.
December 23rd, 2007
(21)
abortion isnt the biggest issue facing this nation. its a wedge issue used to keep people distracted and divided.
December 23rd, 2007
(4)
Agreed. This is a measly nothing issue compared to the monstrous issues such as the federal reserve, the role of the United Nations, taxes and spending, habeus corpus, the war on drugs, the bill of rights, the constitution, rule of law, I could go on.
December 23rd, 2007
(2)
The legality (or lack of it) of abortion is far more likely to affect the average person than the nebulous issues you list. I doubt a pregnant teenager cares too much about the United Nations or habeas corpus for terrorists.
December 24th, 2007
(1)
How about habeus corpus for activists? Habeus corpus for environmentalists? Or habeus corpus for civil libertarians? Another thing is that Ron Paul is most offended by third trimester abortion. If you think that it is okay to have a baby for 6 months, but then decide to have an abortion, there is something wrong with you. Third, Ron Paul proposes to only prosecute the doctor, not the mother. Fourth, he is a federalist, meaning that he would only remove Roe Vs. Wade, but not directly outlaw abortion.
December 24th, 2007
(1)
And you think those other issues are nebulous? Well then you are simply uneducated. The Federal Reserve bails out the banks, at everyone else's expense. This hurts the economy. The average Joe's money is worth less. The price of gasoline goes up. You don't think this affects everybody? How about the fact that so much of our economy changes when the price of oil goes up? Have you not noticed that the price of EVERYTHING goes up when the price of oil goes up? And I'm just getting started here.
December 24th, 2007
(2)
maddogsol, do you know what happened when the Fed didn’t bail out failing banks? It has nothing to do with what money is “worth”. Gas…are you f*cking kidding me. Repeat after me, the Fed has nothing to do with the cost of a barrel of oil. There is no man behind the curtain arbitrarily raising prices on poor stupid joe. You got a major gripe about gas, call the Chinese and Indian embassies and explain to them how they shouldn’t industrialize anymore because it inconveniences joe.
December 24th, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
DIE CHRISTAN DIE
December 24th, 2007
(1)
Habeas corpus has not been suspended for U.S. citizens (unlike in the Civil War) so I don't know what you are talking about. I agree with a lot of Ron Paul's positions, I voted for him as a libertarian way back when, but the reality is legalizing drugs or getting rid of taxes isn't going to happen, but getting rid of abortion rights might, which makes him dangerous. BTW 3d trimester abortions are already illegal.
December 24th, 2007
(0)
Wrong civiliansam. If the Feds did not bail out banks, the banks would make more careful decisions, rather than be careless with credit, which is what gets them into trouble in the first place. If banks go under, it is their stupid faults. Bailing the banks out increases the money supply, which is the cause of inflation. Any financial publication could tell you this.
December 24th, 2007
(2)
Also, when inflation goes up, things become more expensive. This is not even investment banker level knowledge, more like 7th grade level knowledge. Various financial publications have reported the value of the dollar going down and the price of gasoline going up.
December 24th, 2007
(0)
The Fed bails out the banks by creating money out of thin air. It has been proven on various occasions.
December 24th, 2007
(0)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2007/12/23/cccrisis123.xml (that's one link out of many I could post)
December 24th, 2007
(0)
http://tinyurl.com/2aqbsg
December 25th, 2007
(1)
if you want to see high gas prices, try isolationism. Guess what would have happened if Saddam Hussein had been allowed to keep Kuwait, or worse yet invaded Saudi Arabia.
December 25th, 2007
(-2)
Dr. Paul doesn't advocate isolationism
December 26th, 2007
(2)
Libertarians do. Is he a libertarian or not?
December 26th, 2007
(1)
Hes what you call "True Conservative." He actually promotes real conservative values, not this bullsh*t Big Government no freedom constant war in places we don't belong Corporate *ss kissing Neo-Liberal Sludge Bucket that the conservative party has become.
December 26th, 2007
(0)
"Dr. Paul doesn't advocate isolationism" "Libertarians do. Is he a libertarian or not?" You're wrong. Isolationism is when you prevent foreigners from coming to your nation, prevent trade, cut the nation off economically from other nations. Ron Paul and the Libertarians advocate the exact opposite. Wikipedia is your friend.
December 26th, 2007
(0)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isolationism (first couple paragraphs answers all your questions)
December 31st, 2007
(0)
pages on Wikipedia can be written by anyone. It really isn't a reliable source of information. Much like the comments page on a YTMND
December 31st, 2007
(1)
Really? According to this study: http://www.news.com/2100-1038_3-5997332.html , Wikipedia is as accurate as Encyclopedia Britannica.
December 31st, 2007
(0)
doesn't say much for the Encyclopedia Britannica, now does it?
January 1st, 2008
(0)
Oh, you mean that it is put together by HUMAN BEINGS, and not extraterrestrial angels who never make mistakes?
January 1st, 2008
(-1)
What I'm saying is that your point of view is very simple and narrow-minded if you put so much faith in stupid internet articles like the one you just posted. Anything with a sub-topic, "according to a study" should NOT be taken to heart. According to a study, intelligence is directly related to shoe size.
January 1st, 2008
(0)
All I'm saying is that Ron Paul is not an advocate of isolationism. That is a slur created by his opponents, who do everything they can to ridicule him like rabid 12 year olds.
January 1st, 2008
(0)
Well, maybe not all his opponents. Maybe just dirty teeth trolls like Rudy.
January 1st, 2008
(-1)
to all the people above... our situation surrounding inflation is the best it has ever been. The Fed is doing great keeping the inflation rate at a managable level so that there is less unanticipated inflation and investors can feel safe putting their money into stocks and bank accounts. What we need to worry about now is the budget deficit... the US is going bankrupt.
January 1st, 2008
(0)
You are correct about government spending. 100%. But I don't think I can really agree with you about inflation. You ought to take into consideration that there is the officially reported number, and that there is something more important, namely, the relative prices of commodities, imported goods and foreign currencies in relation to the dollar. You should also remember that the government has a vested interest in presenting the inflation rate as favorable, because they are held accountable.
December 23rd, 2007
(3)
RON PAUL FTW
January 3rd, 2008
(0)
It's going to be Ron Paul vs. Obama. I say Obama just because you know something f*cked up will happen when a black president is on duty.
January 6th, 2008
(0)
It's never happened before. How would you know?
December 23rd, 2007
(-1)
[ comment (and 4 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
Watch this movie about our monetary system and be educated as to why the corporations we work for are becoming increasingly ruthless. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-9050474362583451279
December 23rd, 2007
(0)
[ comment (and 1 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
Oh f*ck, Ron Paul has infiltrated YTMND! NOOOOOOO
December 24th, 2007
(3)
we dont need liberty, we need EPIC FREEDOM
December 24th, 2007
(1)
http://tropicalfreedom.ytmnd.com/ - PACARD '08
December 24th, 2007
(-1)
You need to show us YTMND's that don't suck.
December 24th, 2007
(2)
you're a f*cking crackpot. you need to stop jerking off to a candidate that no real person, except a bunch of fat, ultra-republican internet-basement dwellers is gonna vote for. i could talk about the political issues and sh*t, but that's unfunny and doesn't belong on ytmnd.
December 24th, 2007
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
Only a few fat basement dwellers? You are such an idiot. Ron Paul has won multitudes of straw polls, has more money donors than anyone else (and more money for that matter), has the largest audiences in Iowa and New Hampshire and now beats 'big shots' on certain traditional polls across the country. Do yourself a favor and actually learn about the people you criticize. But even if this were not all true, I stick by my principles, and vote for people who best represent my views.
December 25th, 2007
(3)
"he has more money donors than anyone else" (and more money for that matter) - that sure says a lot about whose interests hes taking into account. and i dont even disagree with a lot of what he says. reducing taxes is great and his foreign policy is too. but i cant back someone whose trying to overturn roe v. wade, because that just sends me the message that his social views are pretty backwards. ok fatty?
December 25th, 2007
(-3)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-3)
First of all, I can run 5 miles non-stop, as well as do 30 pushups and 100 situps. How many can you do? I bet I can run circles around you. You don't know jack about me. Second, not only does Ron Paul have the most donors, as well as the most serious supporters, but he reportedly has the most diverse crowds of supporters. Thousands of people of every race, creed, religion, age group, occupation support him. Unlike you, they don't listen to the idiotic smears of Michael Medved.
December 25th, 2007
(-1)
Finally, I don't entirely agree with him about Roe V. Wade either. In every other possible way, though he is one of the most civil libertarian politicians in our nation's history. Outside of abortion, only the ACLU can hope to compare to Ron Paul's civil libertarian track record. So no, he is most certainly NOT Pat Robertson.
December 26th, 2007
(1)
i bet you made that up to prove my wrong. lying on the internet proves youre real life is terrible and bleak. also see the ED article on internet tough guys lol.
December 26th, 2007
(1)
btw i can tear a horse in half and idk who michael medved is
December 26th, 2007
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
When you make a claim about a person you never met, THAT is a lie. You end up making yourself looking like a jerk. Besides, I can prove my claims. I will even private message you where my real name comes up with google results. Namely, road races/street runs, even marathons
December 26th, 2007
(-1)
"and idk who michael medved is" Doesn't change the fact that you rely on cheap insults, because you can't string together a real argument.
December 27th, 2007
(2)
or that im f*cking trolling and i didnt even watch the ytmnd but i think how worked up people get over RNO PUAL IS FUNNYY
December 27th, 2007
(-1)
"Oh, I'm just a troll. Ha ha, just kidding" is the excuse of people who get their *ss handed to them.
December 27th, 2007
(2)
BECAUSE COMMENTS ABOUT PACARD AND ALL CAPS SHOULD BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY
January 13th, 2008
(0)
very seriously.
December 24th, 2007
(2)
no
December 24th, 2007
(1)
I am gonna vote for him. :D
December 24th, 2007
(0)
[ comment (and 1 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
ron paul is growing on me
December 24th, 2007
(1)
F*CK YEAH, INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION ERA POVERTY AND NO FORIEGN RELATIONS! Seriously though, i like half his ideals, and the other half is impossible to achieve in the state this country is in now.
December 24th, 2007
(3)
NO
December 24th, 2007
(-1)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-1)
If you vote for ron paul your voting for old men to have sex with little boys(NMBLA)......................hairy balls
December 24th, 2007
(1)
Boy am I glad that he said he won't run as a 3rd party if he doesn't get the Republican nod. We'd have a bunch of morons voting for him, which would just be giving Hillary a half vote.
December 24th, 2007
(0)
[ comment (and 2 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
I don’t know how anyone could disagree with this man’s views unless they truly are imperialists who think that America should police the world while its people are taxed to death under a crumbling dollar. However, I do agree with what someone said above, ytmnd isn’t exactly the best stage for this… too many kiddies who couldn’t care less about freedom. I am definitely voting for Ron Paul and so should every other sane individual who cares about their liberties.
December 25th, 2007
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
Ron Paul for the win.
December 25th, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
I'm voting for Ron Paul and so should you :)
December 25th, 2007
(0)
[ comment (and 1 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
at least the dude tells the truth.
December 25th, 2007
(-3)
[ comment (and 3 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-3)
Yeah, I don't want pot and all those other mind-f*cking drugs legalized, you want that kind of sh*t? Go move to ansterdam you stupid pot head I'd rather go with Hillary
December 25th, 2007
(-2)
POTUS? No, thanks. Secretary of State? Right on.
December 25th, 2007
(8)
Vote for Gordon Freeman and G-Man in 2008.
December 25th, 2007
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
getting rid of the FBI and CIA? what a great idea! ...not. :P
December 25th, 2007
(-2)
[ comment (and 8 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
You Paultards make me sick. And he's my representative, too...having met the man, I know he's a nice guy who means well. He's done a great job in our district. But the effect of his policies on a federal level would result in a confederacy of sovereign states...and since a system of FEDERALISM has been present and effective since the framing of the Constitution, that would be a serious problem. Breaking the system under the guise of "liberty" is not a proper method of bringing about change.
December 25th, 2007
(-2)
[ comment (and 6 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
Ron Paul said that shopping mall security guards were doing a better job fighting terrorists than U.S. Marines in Iraq and Afghanistan. hes a douche http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFhaH-6QLi4
December 25th, 2007
(0)
Hmm...
December 25th, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
The preteen mentality dominates the majority of these comments. Paul in 08.
December 25th, 2007
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
lol rupaul suckxorz
December 26th, 2007
(2)
Ron Paul supporters are getting so annoying, the thought of how hard he's going to lose in the primaries brings a smile to my face.
December 26th, 2007
(2)
Ron Paul George and Ringo
December 26th, 2007
(2)
I'm voting Ron Paul, he sure as hell is better than any of the others...
December 26th, 2007
(0)
i am voting for him too. but he is not going to win.
December 26th, 2007
(-1)
he is an interesting candidate, but there is a lot about him I don't like
January 3rd, 2008
(0)
Agreed for the most part.
December 26th, 2007
(1)
Gay.
December 26th, 2007
(0)
Yes!
December 26th, 2007
(0)
F*ck off.
December 26th, 2007
(-1)
5 even though you didn't cite my site: http://clearlythebestcandidate.ytmnd.com/
December 26th, 2007
(0)
[ comment (and 2 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
ron paul is fail
December 26th, 2007
(-1)
HAIL RON
December 26th, 2007
(-2)
This ron paul fad is the biggest scam since religion. I'm gonna laugh my *ss off when he doesn't even get the nomination.
December 27th, 2007
(2)
Scam? You care to back that up or are you just talking out of your ass?
December 27th, 2007
(0)
RON CRUISE
January 6th, 2008
(0)
We all know he's going to lose.. just shut up.
December 27th, 2007
(-1)
def.
December 27th, 2007
(-1)
I say... F*CK RON PAUL. And f*ck all asshat politicians. 1'd for faith the lunatic fringe of a corrupt system filled with idiots. Also c*cks.
December 27th, 2007
(0)
Fun Fact: people like you are the easiest to control
December 27th, 2007
(2)
Just a big ron paul ad. Weak. I can't wait for McDonalds ads to be stuck up there. Vote Ronald McDonald 08!
December 27th, 2007
(1)
Grimace for VP!
January 4th, 2008
(0)
http://mcdonald2008.ytmnd.com/ lol
December 27th, 2007
(-4)
[ comment (and 6 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-4)
I hope we have someone like W in 2008 I lOVE HIM!. Your civil liberties are useless when your dead. I think the government should be allowed to randomly search anyone they want. If you have nothing to hide you don't need to worry.
December 27th, 2007
(-4)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-4)
Its our duty to win the New Crusade War. I am HAPPY we bombed iraq I wish we move on to the other muzzie contries and then take the holy land back from those filthy kikes.
December 27th, 2007
(2)
Ron Paul doesn't believe in evolution. I don't vote for anyone who is that stupid.
December 27th, 2007
(1)
Hear hear, the voice of science!
December 27th, 2007
(0)
Yes he does, you idiot.
December 29th, 2007
(0)
No he really doesn't.
December 29th, 2007
(-2)
"The Perfect is the Enemy of the Good"
December 31st, 2007
(-1)
Besides, this hysterical insult is really a form of anti-christian bigotry.
December 27th, 2007
(0)
Why does this country always get f*cked up presidents and f*cked up candidates? Can someone please explain this to me?
December 28th, 2007
(-1)
For the reasons Schoulayer states v
December 27th, 2007
(4)
no use peddling politics here. ytmnd is like an elementary school, except with no teachers to discipline kids when they draw penises on the walls.
December 29th, 2007
(2)
:(
December 27th, 2007
(0)
It was amusing the first time around.
December 27th, 2007
(0)
[ comment (and 27 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
the greatest countries in the world are not in any way libertarian
December 27th, 2007
(1)
I Laul'd.
December 27th, 2007
(2)
He's not winning in New Hampshire. And you don't live in New Hampshire so tough sh*t.
December 28th, 2007
(0)
the song... aw god... awwwww gaaaaawd.
December 28th, 2007
(0)
I'm gonna vote for him in the primaries because 1) I support him and 2) it'll give me an excuse to not vote in the actual election since we dont have to worry about a true republican getting the bid over bible thumper conservatives
<< 1 2 >>