you're a vegtable
Created on: February 27th, 2008
None ( ._.)
Sponsorships:
| user | amount | user | amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| No one has sponsored this site ( ._.) | |||
| Sponsor this site! | Total: $0.00 | Active: $0.00 | |
Vote metrics:
| rating | total votes | favorites | comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| (3.55) | 22 | 0 | 13 |
View metrics:
| today | yesterday | this week | this month | all time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,188 |
Inbound links:
| views | url |
|---|---|
| 46 | https://www.bing.com |
| 2 | http://216.18.188.175:80 |
| 1 | http://www.google.com |
Well thank you for taking the time to fellate your ego over a worthless issue. I was hoping I could slip the "vegtable" under the radar, but I should've known better. Because if it's one thing: spelling errors and typos, not content, is the real element of humor here. Anyway, I also like share that one of my credible accomplishments earned so far is not being an overly-sensitive Guitar Hero f*ggot like yourself; throwing a tantrum over a poor rating I gave an otherwise boring and toneless YTMND.
This isn't a matter of ego. I didn't find the YTMND funny, and rather than just saying "Every night I get down on my knees and pray that Dennis Kucinich will burst into flames.", I decided to find something relevant to say, which involved pointing out the typo. If your idea of a tantrum is me voting 1 on a site that I don't find funny, then why did you come and vote 1 on one of the sites I recently made? Isn't that the same thing?
what you're giving me is disjointed rambling that doesn't serve to prove anything. you didn't give me a reason why my site isn't funny, you're just using the typo which has nothing to do with the site's humor. i'm not mis-understanding anything here. i can have all the typos on the title, and it doesn't take away from the fact that the image is a vegetable coupled with the sound "you're a vegetable." the joke is easily pieced together with these two things alone, as it was desgined to be.
your site wasn't funny because it was too vague. we have an image of pancakes, a message that reads "i NEED to make PANCAKES without MILK how do i do it?", and some song strumming along in the background. why is it funny or entertaining that you need to make pancakes without milk? there's nothing else in it other than that for me to decode. even if the song was the main element in the idea, the idea is niche and lacks timeless quality. giving it the 1 star earned by me.
So, no matter how I look at it: our reasons for not liking each other's sites are NOT the same. I provided
a valid reason; enough of one to understand why i didn't like it. YOU on the other hand don't like my site, because i didn't like your site. the proof? ; you are singling out an irelevant typo and passing it off as objective criticism of my site in its whole. what you're really doing is menstruating over the issue and digging for something yourself feel good. good luck with that. and it is about ego.
EDIT: So, no matter how I look at it: our reasons for not liking each other's sites are NOT the same. I provided a valid reason; enough of one to understand why i didn't like it. YOU on the other hand don't like my site, because i didn't like your site. the proof? you are singling out an irelevant typo and passing it off as objective criticism of my site in its whole. what you're really doing is menstruating over the issue and digging for something to make yourself feel good.
Bold
Italic
Underline
Code
User Link
Site Link