Is that real or hoax?

-2

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=23471 Yup, that's true, watch the movie.

+2

Wow they can't take a joke.

+2

no, history channel is going the way of fox news. LULZ is a corruption of LOL!

+1

Jews is a corruption of Muslims.

-1

History Channel blew up the towers, so they'd have something to make a conspiracy special about. Why do you think there was so many cameras rolling during the attack!? The mint was in on it too, they had to make a money order coin you can buy for 20 bucks to "dedicate" to the whole thing. Bobcat makers were in on it, so they could dispatch 100s of idle microbulldozers to clean up a giant mess. Chevron made money fuelling the bobcats. Bobcat drivers made money driving the bobcats. Bobcat did it, BOBCAT

+42

I was about to say the exact same thing...damnit.

+2

And who owns the History Channel, the U.S. Mint, Bobcat and Chevron? Jews. QED.

+10

Then Spielberg would make a movie about it.

+5

Best comment string ever.

Another succesful media sighting for YTMND. Hopefully max gets this.

+7

YTMND! Created by a jew for anti-semitic purposes...OH WAIT IT WAS SATIRE AND ART AND FOR A LAUGH NEVERMIND GUYS GAME ON!

+2

Since when is a half baked theory considered history?

+11

since 1963

+4

The moon landing was in 1969

+2

But Kennedy's so-called "assassination" was 1963.

-1

Haven't half-baked theories been around since the beginning, though?

+1

yeah who could forget about the Cesar assassination theory or the the "landing" in north America were the indains gave us the land in a friendly gesture or at lease that how the book I'm read "whitey tells you the history"

+1

Best hoax in history: World War 1

+1

Yeah, who the f*ck beleives in trenches? You people are SHEEP, you hear me!!!! SHEEP!!!!!

haha

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WHRTK_E91s watch the whole clip that associates YTMND with "antisemites all over the world".

I was on infowars.com and all of a suddend i see the ytmnd logo in an article picture (http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2007/220807_joke_website.htm). I was like.... WHAT THE!?!?! That 911 history channel doc was the worst9/11 hit piece ever. They completely ignored the evidence.

+2

It's really sad and no surprise that's one of the first things that surfaced after 911. Prell shampoo did it. http://prell.ytmnd.com/

USA did 9/1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TRLF69p_S0&NR=1 covered up banner

damn right we did :D

HELLO DERE!

+4

OH NO A JEW BOOM

+4

RIP Jews : ~1800 BCE - 2007 AD. Der ner ner ner ner ner, der ner ner ner ner ner, der ner ner ner ner ner, der ner ner ner ner ner....

+2

LOL HISTORY CHANNEL

history channel is jew controlled!

Sorry guys. The YTMND site was a satire on the people who believed the Jews caused 9-11. So no they weren't talking about YTMND. This isn't Fox News

-2

When you google "jews did 911", ytmnd pops up just after wikipedia entry. Ytmnd itself isn't mentioned in whole show, "jews did 911" ytmnd is however shown probably by a mistake of a person responsible for incorporating parts of "truthers websites" into the show.

+2

Whyd you 5 it if you are going to bash ytmnd?

It's a good YTMND, What your expecting me to downvote it on opinion instead of merit? Hah not gonna happen

The history of this is when the Taliban got tagged as doing 9-11 a lot of Islamics couldn't believe there own could do this (Like Catholic pedophiles) and who'd frame Islamics? Jews. After a while of this people claimed the republican party was puppets for the Jews then the Jews were responsible for everything from gun crime to high taxes then more rational types started made jokes and it made full circle on YTMND. Yeah YTMND shows up before any "Jews did 9-11" claims. It's not a truther claim in any case.

my favorite YTMNDs are the one's not designed to evoke any form of emotional or intellectual reaction, but just flatly state a state of affairs.

-2

Bill Hicks would have loved to have you in his audience.

+1

Bill Hicks made observational humor. he didn't show up for performances, pass out flyers, and leave.

+2

No he made intellectual jokes designed to provoke thought in his audience. In fact he made a near verbatim reference to what you said in many of his jokes. "I didn't come to a comedy club to think." "Oh yeah then where do you go to think?" To say he made observational humor is a ric*ckulous understatement.

-2

um, okay, you sound like a real Hicks fan, but you definitely don't get sarcasm when you see it. this YTMND is nothing but an upload piece of stale media. it makes no joke, and it hasn't been recontextualized in any way. when it's creator discovered of it existence, he uploaded for the sake of owning it. IT EXLPOITS YTMND'S POTENTIAL TO BE USED AS A MEDIA DUMP. since you 5'd it, would you say that it is "almost as good as," "just as good as," or "better than" Bill Hicks?

+4

I plus'ed you because that's exactly what I did. I exploited Ytmnd Potential to be used as a media dump.

-1

I would say it's apples to oranges. I would also say if that's your sarcasm it's no wonder. Then I would consider saying What is YOUR scope of rating but then realize I don't actually care.

-2

I think dyskrasia is missing the point. What he really meant to say was JamaKinson is a worthless human being and everyone that voted 5 on this site should be suffocted to death by burning feces in an airtight bunker.

+6

I changed my vote from a 4 to a 5 just for you.

-2

oh so dyskrasia is rolling out his plan of intentionally including typos to get attention

+1

This is the greatest thing I have ever seen.

+3

Have you ever seen grown man naked ?

+6

I watched a man shave his balls.

+3

It's called soccer in Europe.

+3

0_0

+2

ZOROASTRIANS DID 9/11

+3

+1 comment

lol

max did 9/11?

+1

Sounds logical as max is a jew.

+2

so basically he is our cult leader, and YTMND helped 9/11 happen?

LEGENDARY

-2

That entire "documentary" was a hit piece against real journalism. There wasn't a speck of truth in it. The fact that they were willing to devote any attention to this website, which is clearly one constructed for humor, is evidence of that. I mean, their entire standpoint was that ANY deviation from the main line of bullsh*t they've been stringing for the past six year is basically traitorous. I'm sorry, but the real traitors are in the White House, and they don't get to question my patriotism.

-1

listen, I'm a big skeptic about a lot of things, but suggesting that this was a hit piece against 'real journalism' and that its people like Alex Jones who are the real journalists, is absurd. Screw Loose Change. I'm not saying 9/11 happened just as the government says it did, but all these videos that circulate the internet are mostly full of paranoid bullsh*t, and it is certainly not better journalism than even the average media hack.

+2

The "experts" interviewed on the show work for the company that owns the History channel and have no professional experience in the fields they were supposedly defending. In order to make this a tenable position, they picked which points to defend. They made a documentary because they didn't have any actual experts to defend actual points of contention and therefore would not have been able to participate in an intelligent debate. That being said, there's no need to make this site. It's sh*tty.

Did anyone actually noticed that I made this site ONLY because they showed YTMND in TV :| ?

+4

wow why would you write a paragraph long ytmnd comment

Who cares how credible the people who did the documentary were or if they did the documentary as a joke or not. The point is that YTMND was still on TV.

are you trying to tell me Popular Mechanics' debunking of conspiracy theories has less credibility than a couple 20 somethings who set a hodgepodge of out of context facts and blurry photos set to spooky music? or a guy like Alex Jones who believes the government is behind everything? I'm not saying this History Channel is some wonderful piece of 9/11 debunking by any stretch, but it's still better than horsesh*t like Zeitgeist.

-1

Your refutation of their documentary is similar to theirs. I mean, ad hominem might actually be a step up for them. To the creator of the site... WOW YTMND ON TV. Post it in the forums. Nobody cares. You're not famous.

-1

well, Im not going to change your mind in a YTMND post, so I'm not going to even try with this one. All I can say is back in 02 I entertained these theories, and now I don't. All the questions I had have been answered, and when I look at these movies now I can't believe people can be as gullible as I was. If you choose to live in a fantasy world where the government is that efficient they can pull this sh*t off, then that's your choice.

+2

FOR EXAMPLE. LULZ IS A CORRUPTION OF LOL. YEA THATS BELIEVABLE, FOX NEWS IS.. A LOSER? DUYNDUNDUNDUNUDNUDNUDNUDNUDNDU

To The MASTER: If you choose to live in a fantasy world where a largely disorganized, fractionally funded "terror" group is that efficent, then that's your choice. If you choose to ignore who made sh!tloads of money from 9/11 and blame it on "Al-Qaieda" who is worse off since "successfully causing 9/11" while the evidence against them wouldn't convict a black man of jaywalking in the South 50 years ago, then go ahead but you are doing the future of mankind a great disservice.

MasterSitsu: Yes Loose Change does have many errors. Zeitgeist was NOT horsesh*t. I really thought you would be smart enough to actually research the information than to just deny it because it was in a video on .the internet. For shame my friend.

"All the questions I had have been answered"... I'm not really concerned with the questions one might get when one ponders such an event, but I am much more concerned with the evidence found at the sites. There are serious questions to do with certain substances and structural enigmas that haven't been well supported in my experience. Maybe they are out there, but I haven't seen them. To say that I believe conspiracy theories is ridiculous, as it is to say that the prevailing theories are airtight.

+2

The biggest question remains: how do you topple two of the world's tallest buildings (period, as they were not haphazardly thrown together, with one plane impact which didn't themselves compromise the structural integrity of the building as their engineering was so sound) and how do you topple two of the world's tallest buildings quickly, evenly, and with such a small debris radius with an uncontrolled fire starting at the TOP of a building? If all it takes to perfectly demolish a building is jet fuel...

+2

then there are going to be a lot of demolition companies going out of business.

+2

But, regardless of all of the oddities of the case, the documentary in question egregiously violated the journalism and documentary ethics. Egregiously. Egregegegegegeiously.

+2

blah blah blah blaaaaah blah blah babble babble. blah blah blaaah blah blah blaaah blah blah! bleh blaah blah blable bahh blah blaah. blaah blha bllah blaaaah blaaaaaaaaah blah blaaah blah blah blah. blah bla**H! blah blah bl*h BL***** *** **** blah blah blah blaaah blah. blah blaah blaaaaaah blahh blaah. blaaaaah blllah blaaah blah blah blah blah. blah blah blllaaaaaahhhhh. BLAH BLAH BL*H!

-2

LOL at calling YTMND anti-semitic when the site owner is a Jew XD

+2

i love ytmnd on tv

I saw this

The history channel rox since half of their shows are about Nazis.

+3

And the others are about guns n kicking peoples asses. see Human Weapon.

+2

History Channel exclusive: NAZIS DID WWII!111 DEUTSCHLAND! DEUTSCHLAND!

WORST. HISTORIAN. EVER.

If that "HONEST JOURNALISM!!!!" comment was total sarcasm I would vote 5, other wise say it was and I'll change my vote, JamaKinson.

Screw it, now it clicked.

crush his little bones with your boots

lawl

1'd for stupidity. The History Channel Documentary was quite correct about what happened. Yes, Jews were the first people blamed for 9/11. It didn't get the publicity, it didn't get the fan-fare the other conspiracy nutjobs out there got, but it happened. The YTMNDs were making fun of the conspiracy crackpots out there, but the Jews were indeed blamed for 9/11, along with many other people.

-2

See description.

I did, and I laud the documentary for telling the truth about infantile conspiracy theorists. I understand what you're saying: the documentary took the YTMNDs way out of context, but the History Channel hit the nail right on the head with this documentary. I've been screaming this sh*t from the roof-tops going on seven years now, how the government had nothing to do with it, and only now is real scientific know-how being placed center stage over the silly conjecture of America hating basement virgins.

-3

I mean, where do you think they got the inspiration for those YTMNDs back in 2001? They may have been sarcastic, but they were based in truth. Jews were blamed for 9/11 from the word go.

-1

That's why I watched it, because somebody finally made a documentary with real experts, and real eyewitnesses. I previously watched Zeitgeist and it was just unbelievable what sh*t people are ready to believe.

Well then, I stand corrected... you get a 5

"with real experts" are you f*cking joking? They called them "experts" explicitly in the documentary, but they don't have any title or experience that would qualify them as an expert. Their "experts" were tv producers. When you call your "experts" "experts" instead of giving reason to believe that they are experts, then you are either a terrible documentary maker or dishonest. And, if you take the documentary's word for their "expertise", which you obviously did, you're an idiot.

+3

Now, all of the conspiracy claims may be false, but the documentary did nothing that would even come close to that. They picked their own claims to refute, which were obviously the weakest and least supported ones. If I make a website about "Unicorns Did 9/11" would they cover it? This wasn't a documentary, it was a propaganda film. I was interested to see the actual refutations of the conspiracy claims, but they instead resorted to sophistry, mudslinging, and their overall effect was one large straw man.

zeitgeist sucked balls

unicorns did 9/11

-1

lol "real experts" History Channel is owned by the same company that owns Popular Mechanics. The history channel's show was a mere hitpiece. here's a good link http://www.wtprn.com/History_Channel_Hit_Piece.html

Uhh, Korf... Popular Mechanics' piece was done by engineers, not idiots with an axe to grind. I think you all are just ticked 'cuz you got saged. Deal with it bro.