awesome.

+2

What? All he did wast take this site and change one minor thing shatneriskirk.ytmnd.com/

+1

kassius! a 5? i expected better from you

+1

His girlfriend must be surfing on his account again....

+1

Anyway.... 1) not putting the original url in your image and sound origin equals trying to pull a fast one. 2 ) even if you cited correctly, it's still ottervomits site with a frame replaced. 3) The original Shatner is Kirk ytmnd was featured in an article in the Washington Post for crying out loud. here's the article--- http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/29/AR2006072900041.html

+3

Where can I put the citation in?

-1

Ok, I only inserted a citation to shatneriskirk.ytmnd.com but did not cite ottervomit. Fixed that :)

-1

the guy copied the same citation's ottervomit used in his original - i'm glad nobody even considered he might not know what the proper citation would be, but instead assumed that he was trying to "pull a fast one". also: the one frame he replaced made the piece timely, which is sometimes enough to equal funny.

-2

Asterios, that would be the correct citation if you assembled this gif yourself. In this case the correct citation would be the URL of the original site. Put the URL in the image & sound origin and tada... you have a corrct citation!

+2

artorious? http://artorius.ytmnd.com/

money-hat: did you read my earlier comment at all? i didn't say he'd made the correct citation, but i think it was out of ignorance, not malice. you're the one who claimed that he was "trying to pull a fast one".

-1

so why is the origional's address still not in the image citation?

+1

lol'd

-1

yes.

-1

9 straight 5's

-1

http://ninetimes.ytmnd.com/

+2

needs preloader

+2

agreed bad sync without

I can tell you put a lot of hard work into this.

+1

holy eyeliner!

+1

HA!

meh

-2

omfg how could you?!??!?!

-1

:care:

-2

Put the Price is Right fail sound in, he'll five it.

Damn right he is!

+1

this is the exact same thing as the original. almost nothing is different about it. fail

+4

Exactly.

+1

http://shatneriskirk.ytmnd.com/

What keaton said.

+1

Would you believe it if the Washington Post featured the original in it's pages???? Cause it did---- http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/29/AR2006072900041.html

+2

there's almost nothing different from the original, stop recycling.

+1

epic awesomeness!

-1

ahahahah

-1

Of course all I did was to take the site and changed two minor things. That's why I called it "UPDATED" >_<

-1

MAY-B U WILL GIT ON THE TV, LIKE OTTER.

+2

-1

PRICELINE NEGOTIATOR!

Thank you for updating that.

-1

rofl, funny as hell.

-1

Y'know, considering how many casting rumors are out there involving that movie, as well as just the general screwed-up-ness of it, I wouldn't doubt that in the end they use a stunt double and Photoshop old-school Kirk's head onto the new one's body.

+1

I think the best part is the "shatner is kirk" text and how it pops up on the screen just like it would in the old series, completely not synchronized with the music.

Ottervomit made the original, he has intertube rights to the remake.

+1

but not to the update

-3

lol, eye makeup

-1

I didn't hear any New Edition at all

+1

Why did he always wear mascara in this series?

-1

MAY LOCUSTS AND RABID RETARDED COW BABIES CONSUME YOUR FLESH FOR STEALING FROM OTTERVOMIT

+1

uh, the guy called it an update.

-4

That's like me correcting a historical reference in a famous book then publishing it as my own work and just calling it a "new edition." It doesn't work like that. Now if he'd put something FUNNIER in or PARODIED the original, it might be worthwhile. But he updated an insignificant reference that didn't change the humour value.

+1

1) isn't a big part of ytmnd building on the work of others? 2) i don't think the reference was insignificant, i think the reference was funny. you gotta give points for timely humor, and the reference was timely. sorry he didn't spend an all nighter in photoshop making his ytmnd, but sometimes being timely's enough, and this is one of those times.

-1

trek sh*t.

-4

Way to steal ottervomit's site. :o/

THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE

I had considered making an update to SHATNER IS KIRK but I didn't want to recycle the same site. I was perusing my DVD's (albeit halfheartedly because, well, I've been in a creative slump for a LONG while now) for new footage to pull and do a Chris Pine version. Now I don't have to!

+3

You didn't add an explosion noise to it :(

Otter, put Chris Pine in the Christopher Pike Life Support Chair, as Kirk sadly wheels him away (from the end of Menagirie PartII) Only trekkies will get it, but whatever...

+2

Oh and for the record, I have no ill-will towards this site or its creator.

+1

That makes one of us. I shot a man once just for snoring.

+1

40+ years of history.. ah, f*ck it. JJ can do better. Way to wipe your *ss with tradition Paramount.

icwutudidthar

how can you ruin the sync? all you did was put a new picture on the screen

then why did you give this a 3? this cant deserve more than a 1

You just replaced the image on the screen

+2

There was no room for improvement, it was already perfect - with the exception of those two frames :)

-1

i f*cking laaaawlt.....

Not funny, what were you thinking?

awesome-y time!

EXACTCOPYTMND

+1

nice explosion noise, oh wait...

*insert text here*

rip-off. already done.

+1

Please replace "updated" with "ripped off".

I remember this quite clearly

fail :(

Nice! 8 stars. everyonehaseights.ytmnd.com

ripped

Fail.

Nicely done! (and a Sowell fan!)