I'm building a gay love robot, now leave me alone

+1

I am C-3PO, Human-Cyborg relations.

+8

Robert Downey Jr. stands 5' 9" while C-3PO only stood 5' 6". Enlighten me on how this is possible, while i go not get laid.

+3

He removed his shins, Bob. He removed them.

+7

That was not expected. I LOL'ed, you get a 5.

-1

dont worry this explains it all http://members.tele2.nl/class-pc/

-3

I am C-3PO, Human-F*GGOT relations.

-2

funny for star wars

-1

Needed more Tony Stark.

-1

n*gg*rs

-6 [show comment][hide comment]

areterrible people

-4

N I G G A R S

-6

You know, I kinda see what DW is talking about. This site is mad overrated, that's why I changed my vote. It's an alright concept, but if anyone who wasn't featured made it, there's no way it would be on top of U and C. I think DW is just pissed about the whole featured user system, and how NARVs upvote pink users just because they're featured.

I sure look like a dumbass now.

IRON KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN!!!!!!!!!!

-7 [show comment][hide comment]

please make this dw

-5 [show comment][hide comment]

He probably already has... 40 times

+9

...but hey, it's not sh*t, it's "satire"

+4

Actually I haven't. Also, populear featured loser frontpagef*g DVD rips video game references and political jokes are the real sh*t sites

-12 [show comment][hide comment]

I love wang's 'DVD rips' rant. Would he perfer VHS rips? F*cking moron. These aren't straight rips, there are edits. So one must assume you simply have a problem with the DVD format. I don't even think you know what your beef is anymore. Retard

-6 [show comment][hide comment]

Maybe there's just not enough ear rape for him.

+2

Lots of the "edits" merely include rearranging the scenes or adding some lame sound effect. Of course there's the OMG I FOTOSHOPPED MARIO INTO A RANDOM MOVIE SCENE! VOTE 5 AND GET THIS 4.7+ BECAUSE YOU LOVE YOUR CHILDHOOD NOSTALGIA OF MARIO!

-6 [show comment][hide comment]

"merely include rearranging the scenes" See in this case NS change the entire plot of Iron Man and made a joke out of it. That gay rant you just made doesn't really expalin what's wrong with that. You aren't just saying you didn't think this joke was funny. You're saying that even attempting to make a joke on YTMND is wrong. Give us any real reason not to just write you off as a bitter moronic troll, please.

+5

As much as I love you dw, can you honestly say that http://betterversionofshatneronpolitics.ytmnd.com/ took more effort than this site?

What do you expect? He's 26 years old and he delivers pizza for a living.

+4

You know I'm a fan of yours DW and I like you, but you've got quite the double standard going on. All of Goneja's and Nitesky's Koen, F*ggot, and Khan sites are movie scenes with head pasting. Most of which are the same joke set to different scenery. Yet you fived them all. Now I don't care what you vote or what you like, but come on.

+3

i dont dvd rips. i go straight from avi. that were downloaded, then virtualdub then photardshop, but darth still hates my sites..i think. so you are completely off basis there joey

-4

I don't have a problem with SOME movie rips, but there's enough sh*tty ones by comparison for me to say that if it's a movie rip, it's sh*t. This one is a bad example, but I don't know how any person with even a slight sense of humor can enjoy a typical fourest, fearcondom, or bob site. Also, go back to the "f*ggy short film" doctrine. Not good enough at video editing to post your joke on youtube? Convert it to a gif and take out 80% of the frames and put it on YTMND instead!

-2

titanium-khancko

I love how we're being lectured on the finer points of comedy by people who have spent the past 3 years 5'ing every countless iteration of the same three or four jokes

+4

I may not know what's funny, but I know what isn't

-3

Comedy gold http://rapjokes.ytmnd.com/

-1

"As much as I love you dw, can you honestly say that http://betterversionofshatneronpolitics.ytmnd.com/ took more effort than this site?" No, but it's funnier

-7

Those who can do. Those who can't join the FPA. LOL at people who spend 12 hours a day here but complain when a YTMND is 15 seconds long

+2

I don't remember ever complaining that this YTMND was too short - it just sucked

-3

Oh god. Anywho, my point is stop saying 'DVD rip' as a generic complaint. If you mean F*ggy Short Film, say that. No one knows what you mean when you say DVD rip. 99% of the visual media used here, much of which you 5, came from DVDs. A classic style site can be from a DVD rip. I beat off to DVD rips everyday. Stop putting them down damnit

-1

You know, I kinda see what DW is talking about. This site is mad overrated, that's why I changed my vote. It's an alright concept, but if anyone who wasn't featured made it, there's no way it would be on top of U and C. I think DW is just pissed about the whole featured user system, and how NARVs upvote pink users just because they're featured.

-3

By "DVD rip" I just mean taking a scene from a movie and either just uploading it directly or adding in some random unfunny joke that usually involves popular YTMND media like Star Trek or Star Wars, or just adding video game references to try to gain nostalgia votes. These sites are rarely actually funny, and I just think they get blindly upvoted by way too many people while actually funny sites are left to rot in the realm of 2.9-3.8 or so

-4

It especially sucks when you work hours to make a GIF and it gets 3.5, and some bullsh*t is on U and C. Although, I don't think that's the point that DW is trying to argue. And this GIF looks like it actually involved effort. But everyone here knows what I'm saying.

-3

I like to pet kitties

+1

lol jealous f*gz. DW's first comment sez it all. he's just made his KHAAAAAN dvd rip site which is a simple joke, is not as funny as this site, which took more effort, and is actually funnier. who knows. basically DW and DW's Nutjuggler really, don't have any points i can see at all imho

I don't know if Persian is one of his six million forms of communication.....

+3

Don't worry, everyone understands dining in hell.

+2

The movie would have been vastly superior without the action scenes, just C-3PO peacefully resolving peoples disagreements.

+5

and a naked Paltrow

+2

-1 for the sound being over 9000 times louder than the voice. Otherwise, good stuff!

-3

and by sound I mean the music...

-2

wow. i'm impressed. i didn't expect C-3P0 to show up. But he did. that was pretty cool of him. The music was kinda louder than the voice

Little less building action scenes, more actual diplomacy in action. Very awesome idea though.

Soo GAY!!

terrible

-2

Enjoyed throughly. I actually did not expect this.

+1

That was awesome

+1

Tony Stark must be a Democrat.

+2

HURRRRR

+1

epic

+1

Artoo says the chances of survival are seven hundred seventy-five...to one.

-1

I thinks its seven hundred fifty.

+1

Ok. Way overrated, as usual

-1

iron man ftw !

+1

Good thing this was captured in wide screen or we might have missed all the important details on the edges of that gif.

+1

get it its star wars duh

-1

o lol, now I get it

-1

-1

This site reminds me of those two movies that I saw at two different intervals of my life!

+1

5'd for being more entertaining than the sh*tty *ss movie.

+1

-1 for little to no payoff after that build-up.

I kind of agree with this

-1

great timing

-2

TONY STARK WAS ABLE TO *BUILD* THIS IN A *CAVE*! WITH A BOX OF *SCRAPS*!

+4

ON TATOOINE!

+3

horsedick

-2

A couple times a year, I wish there was an option for 6 stars. This is one of those times.

+1

the pacing is off towards the end... it wraps up too quick to let the punchline sink in. I still love you though

-1

I dont have the attention span for this YTMND

-1

horrible

Its good- but only for a snicker. The punchline was pretty weak.

-1

I personally found the overall message to be quite contrived and utterly meaningless. The punchline was quick and without flavor. Truly an effort that fell through the floorboards... etc. Is YTMND to be taken this seriously now? Are these submissions up for an end of the year review that will last around 2 and a half hours and be completely retarded? Oh lawdy indeed.

-2

WIN

+1