Couldn't sleep so I figued I'd post this, even though no one will see it at this hour

+3

I made a site like this once. I was going to change Ytmnd but Max offered me a 3 month paid vacation and a company car. All I had to do was sign something saying I won't continue making proposal sites. Henry and I went to Europe. Kids, sometimes it pays to be gay.

+28

ban users with over 50% 1 and 5 votes (you)

-34 [show comment][hide comment]

also horrible ytmnder would constitute about 103% of the people on this site (statistical errors due to alt accounts)

-34 [show comment][hide comment]

christ narvs with opinions make me so f*cking pissed should disable all text ability for narvs and delete all narv sites with opinions in them

-34 [show comment][hide comment]

Lets compare profiles, who's the narv?

+11

lol @ momthinksimcool calling other people NARVs. momthinksimcool is easily one of the worst YTMNDers I know.

+20

I had to go to Urbandicionary.com to look up "NARV" just to make sure I wasn't one. Happy to report that I'm not.

+12

you f*ggots are such humongous noobs that you dont even know what narv is f*cking drown yourselves or at least read the wiki a little before you talk. do just register to a site and no nothing about it and f*cking start making demands, are you f*cking stupid

-31 [show comment][hide comment]

momthinksimcool for supermod

+11

at least learn the interface for christs sake, check your vote spread and have your mom spank you for every 1 and 5 above average and have her take away your access to the internet, until youre at least 15

-20 [show comment][hide comment]

what's a "noob"?

+10

I think unpunctuated comments should be a bannable offense, but I don't feel like making a whole YTMND about it.

+5

thejuglator has like 70% 5 votes, i guess he doesnt know what a narv is

-13 [show comment][hide comment]

your envyous becouse your sites cant get to up and comming lulz

+1

What's interesting is that this guy has almost precisely the same amount of 1-4 star votes, even though they're all well over a thousand each. As much as I like that voting behavior, I have to wonder if you're giving this a one star vote just because you're like Monk and need your statistics neat and tidy as opposed to actually having a valid opinion on the site.

+2

that's a valid concern, I know it would be possible to just simply vote an exactly equal amount of each number without even thinking about it, but my vote spread comes from the opposite affect of actually thinking about how much i like sites relative to others. a lot of people whenever they see something positive they hit 5 and if they feel negative they hit 1 and dont even bother with the 3's if they're indifferent, or they just vote 5 on popular sites so people will like them and rate their sites higher

-5

the one thing i can say to refute your claim is i would have to be pretty insane to make hundreds and hundreds of votes just to be "neat". that wouldnt be any fun. it' s much more fun to actually put thought into your votes as opposed to just pushing a button repeatedly. i think most of the people on this site learned to vote playing nintendo

+1

"i think most of the people on this site learned to vote playing nintendo" One of the funniest and astute statements I've read in a while.

+3

yeah, ptkfgsmaster2maryo and goomba94's sites do so well....

1. downvoters are the only thing that keep ytmnd from total destruction, be more worried about the upvoters 2. only power hungry f*ggot nerds would be willing to moderate on this site and that would be gay 3. you can make the slots however you want, no need to change defaults 4. get it out of your head that ytmnd will be on tv 5. stop thinking that your stupid ideas could fix a ruined site....

-3

you have to know that the upvoters are ruining everything. they piss off good users more that downvoters ever did, and make them leave. these days, the good ratings have less to do with the quality of the site, and more to do with the people you know. it isnt good when EVERY week 3 or 4 sites are voted higher than the hall of fame sites ever were. the classics' good ratings are just getting spit on when any douche bag can head paste a koen site and get upvoted to the moon.

+2

people who whine about downvoters care about themselves and their sites. people who whine about upvoters care about the integrity and greatness of the site. stop being selfish and shortsided, and realized fourest was the death of ytmnd.

-1

your ideas suck

+2

I love this site and I'm sorry if I left out upvoters as one of the problems. I agree, having to have a site be 4.4 to be in U+C is just as big of a problem as downvoters were. I still thinks this place can recover though. Honestly I can't imagine being in any online forum other than this one, regardless of all the f*gs here there are too many people that make this site great (or at least there were).

they all left.....except for mik3m

-1

mik3m has like 2 sites left

-1

http://victoryalliancefailure.ytmnd.com/

+1

"Arguing on the internet is like running in the special olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded."

-2

it's daytime somewhere

And you won't sleep until YTMND meets atleast 2/3 of your demands. You know, after a couple days of no sleep you start to see some pretty wild effects.

lol, you're a loser bob.

-2

To fix ytmnd, vote TuRtLeS for mod.

-2

hey everyone fourest left ytmnd so he could go to rehab for his alcoholism. hes only like 16....lololololol

Anyone else ever notice that btb's highest rated site is simply an explanation of how he made his other highest rated sites? Riveting.

+1

hey everyone, bob tries to act older on the net but i used to talk to him and he is younger than me!

-1

lol fourest

While this is a good way to get discussion going, most, if not all of this stuff has been brought up previously. What it comes down to is YTMND only has one real coder, sysadmin, administrator, person to deal with ads, legal complaints, etc. Plenty of the items on your list are reasonable, a lot are even in the TODO, it's just a matter of when they will get done.

+3

That being said, I don't think we need more exposure until the site is capable of purging "undesirables" and I don't think downvoters/upvoters need to be dealt with unless they are gaming the system by having multiple accounts, as there aren't any rules against it and I think ultimately they even themselves out. If you average every vote on the site it is ~ 2.7, so it seems like despite all of the "dishonest" voting, things still seem to average out.

+1

What's the worry about undesirables? MySpace and 4Chan are comprised mostly OF undesirables, yet they have no trouble with fame.

good content > fame

+12

Do you have any plans to put in some way of purging undesirables? Because it's obviously too hard to do manually with one administrator.

High pressure water hoses

+2

i hope one day i find a girl like mtic irl

TuRtLeS for Moderat00rz, heh.

I watched it and I agree with everything.

+4

People seem to have run out of funny ideas as well, I used to be able to open up any random site and at least half the time end up rofling all over the show, now it's like "ehh.."

-2

yeah, things around here are looking pretty grim. It's sad to see alot of the ytmnder's whose stuff I really loved haven't logged on in like 4 months or longer.

stevemilleralert.ytmnd.com

ultra f*g

I agree with most of this

except proposal #1, or 10..w/e the last one. i dont like that proposal.

i laughed when i saw my name

+2

why is tkx7's name gold. are you implying that he's outstanding? LOLOL

+3

you weren't black

i saw, i was blue or something.

+1

so its horrible to be black? I C GOOD SIR.

+1

its a pleasure to be your 5th vote

+2

#8 means you want us all deleted. LOL I voted 5 anyway.

+2

Preloader works for my 100% of the time, ever (OS X Firefox). Only part I didn't agree with.

+2

that might be true of OSX but I have experienced issues in windows XP firefox 2&3 and on a fedora virtual machine I run at work with firefox. I had to roll back quicktime on XP FF2 just to get it working again. I also wish they would do away with .wav formats all together as theese seem to be to blame for alot of the sound issues on sites and mp3s are not hard to make.

+2

i agree but who is going to do it?

+2

I could of been a featured user?

+2

All good points, sir.

+5

Your proposal has been reviewed by the board and we all agree. You have two weeks to make it happen.

+7

Something tells me that people don't get paid enough to care to do those things. But it's all very nice.

-2

Something tells me that people don't get at all.

lol I forgot to say paid.

We also need a new coffee maker in the cafeteria.

+9

There definitely needs to be something done about featured users. I died a little the day steakman was featured and MrSinistar wasn't.

+4

this is like 2 weeks late ytmnd is healthy again because the ppl ruining it are busy with fractions worksheets again till may

I heartily disagree with number 8.

-2

then why didn't you 1 this?

-5

because there's more than 2 voting numbers f*cking narv

-1

Because there are more than 500 sites on YTMND that deserve a 1. Christ.

+3

YTMND = SERIOUS BUSINESS

-2

SHUT UP IT IS

+13

Why do you people always piss on people who only vote 1 and never mention people who only vote 5? To me the biggest problem that will never be addressed is large scale vote hacking by the likes of Fourest and AndySavage. The 'vote drone' accounts they have people vote with usually have nothing but 5s for them and their friends. So deleting all users with nothing but 5 votes would stop abuse. Deleting the accounts with 1s would do nothing because those people usually downvote everyone - so it doesn't matter

-2

You make a valid point. Maybe the same sort of system could be implemented for the upvote spammers?

-6

yea but atleast getting rid of the downvoter accounts would improve all the decent sites and users that were damaged in the past. i doubt that a downvoter will go and re-vote 1 on ALL the sites he/she has ever downvoted already. plus if it was regulaly kept tabs on (dunno if thats possible or wotever just imagining) then the site could continuously keep downvoters at bay..... u never know, people might even stop bothering because they always get deleted eventually.

-1

And honest to god you see the sites that have been getting 4.7 ratings lately? They are laughably bad. We need more downvoters. When people like Syncan and Sitsu used to actually make good, funny sites even they didn't score higher than 4.5 / 4.6 because the downvoters who downvoted everyone. I can't fathom that you babies are complaining about downvoters today when just the gayest most unfunny sites can get a 4.7 rating. If you YTMNDed 2 years ago I guess you would have killed yourself. There aren't any f*cking downvoters anymore so I don't even know what the hell you're talking about. We need the downvoters back. For the wee balance.

+1

Example of who should be deleted: http://ytmnd.com/users/SirHexan/votes

I vote zero. Also, umfuld, you are so very wrong. When someone downvotes a GOOD site, it reduces the rating much quicker than a 5 vote can raise it. To get a 4.5 rating, you can only have 1, 1-star vote for every 5, 5-star votes (or something to that effect, too lazy to actually do itsmath.ytmnd.com) So some blind douchebag downvoter with nothing better to do happens upon your new site that you worked on for 12 days and *bam*, you're off Up and Coming and bye-bye any chance for exposure.

yeah pretty much, and if he has even one or two alts and a grudge against you you're toast.

Why don't we make a politcallycorrectmnd ...you can vote from 3 stars to 3 stars, everyone get's a Chuck Norris thumbs up sticker and level up music?

Wrong. If Punisher 1s every stie - repeat - EVERY SITE - his vote is meaningless. I'm sorry you can't grasp this - but I could waste my entire life trying to explain stuff to f*cking retards, I'd rather not though. If someone - like fourest - has 150 accounts at his disposal and just 5s certain sites; That's 1000 times worse. Moron

-2

How? At least we're getting new content, granted some of it may be crap but isn't it better than looking at the same stuff for 4 days in a row.

-1

Anig - I agree one person with a grudge and who abuses alts can kill anyone's site who's not featured and that sucks. But that doesn't have anything to do with what you said in your site. You said people who almost only vote 1 - someone with a grudge against you might not fall into that catagory so it doesn't really apply.

-1

Umfuld, don't make sh*t up about me because I call you out on your whiny bullsh*t. Last time you said I votehacked, I challenged you to provide at least ONE alt that I've used to upvote ANY of my own sites. You have nothing. You really think I'm pulling something? Ask the mods. Please, be my guest. I'd love to see your face when you find out your cries of alt abuse are all in vain.

+7

Wait the stars are used for voting? I thought they were just for decoration.

+5

Technically, fives are weighted much less than ones, so that a decent enough reason to focus on removing downvoters. But I don't think the figures should be 50% of votes, it should be more like 70%.

+2

I usually only vote 5, but I do it to a small percentage of total sites. It should be number of 5 votes out of total votes possible. I either like a site (5), hate it (1), or don't care (don't vote).

-2

I think people should stop trying to control the voting habits of others. If someone only wants to vote 5 on what they like and 1 on what they don't like, that's their business. Learn to make a site he won't 1 if you care so much. Sh*tty voting habits is not the same as abuse.

-2

gladedb

"Wait the stars are used for voting? I thought they were just for decoration." It's decoration man, it's just for decoration. That's it and that's all

I am AndySavage's alt

It's got nothing to do with alts andy. but facts speak for themselves. You are a vote hack: http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/7181/00ju4.png 1000 fewer views = 100 more votes ??? Add it up YTMND. It's math

Ok, lets do a little math. Maybe it's been a few decades since you took a math class, but surely you still know how ratios work. Votes/view would be the important one here. Go look at the profiles again as they are right now, dust off your TI-83 and do some division. The vote-per-view ratio is nearly the exact same number for these two sites. You can even go check out this week's top viewed and find one that have a MUCH higher vote-per-view. That means they must ALL be votehacking right? What a joke.

+1

find ones*. Here, I'll save you some effort: http://www.ytmnd.com/sites/profile/875614 http://www.ytmnd.com/sites/profile/876219 http://www.ytmnd.com/sites/profile/875590 just a few examples

We only had TI-5's and Johnny 5's in 88, Not your fancy schmancy TI-83's

After 1 day of voting you had 100 more votes than a site that had 1200 more views. That's a vote hack buddy. Whether it's you doing it or if you're just F.O.F. (Friend of Fourest) I don't know. But you'll never be able to explain that away. Never. Your scores are meaningless because there is clearly cheating involved. You're the Barry Bonds of YTMND

-1

Oh, silly umfuld. You think I'd risk all my sites and a spot on the top rated users page for that? I've told you once and I'll tell you again: go complain to the mods if you really think i'm dishonest. Really. Do it. Contact the head of the bureau. Launch a full investigation. But you don't want to, do you, because you know you'll be wrong. So you're gonna sit here and flood comment pages with your baseless accusations. Too bad everyone here knows you're full of sh*t.

+2

Usually the only sites I vote on are the ones that I really like so I believe that I would only have 5 votes. That would put good folk like me at risk.

-1

just get rid of steakman and we'll all be fine.

+1

by the way, idiot, getting 100 more votes than the top viewed site for a day is not baseless. Since only a couple of sites a day get 100 votes total lately, getting 100 MORE votes than the TOP VIEWED site - it's quite basefull. You cheat. It's a proven fact. Your scores, like fourest's, are meaningless.

-1

That's a slam-dunk case you got there buddy. A screenshot is some very basefull* evidence. http://api.ytmnd.com/sites/thismanisamidgetifyoudidntknow/votes_by_day http://api.ytmnd.com/sites/Extenze/votes_by_day http://api.ytmnd.com/sites/Taa-daa/votes_by_day P.S. the math will be easier for you this time

+1

people can vote whatever the f*ck they want. don't delete them because they've only seen 100 sites and 70 of them sucked dick.

totally agree. I reeely hope max sees this or someone and does something about it...... though knowing ytmnd, nothing will happen. is it so hard to get som more moderators to take care of the site? I'm sure there's plenty of decent users who could do that job without abusing it. I dunno how moderating works exactly but comon

this site shouldn't be killed.

+2

Listen to your friend Billy Zane, he's a cool dude.

+5

just delete all users ok

-4 [show comment][hide comment]

only one things required. a better community.

+1

And that requires banning f*gs like Umfuld and steakman

+1

I have to admit, this is the first time I've logged on in probably a year... and there's a gut feeling that I have to say this: ytmnd is a great site, and I use to be on here all day long like 2-3 years ago, but now i really dont get on much. It's not that I hate this place... its just life. Sorry to break it to some of those that jerkoff to this site, but some people just foudn other things to do, lived there life, and moved on. It's the truth

+1

A list site with a serious intention, I honestly was expecting #1. - NEDM. Thank you sir for proving my intuition wrong. In regards to the content, I say lets overload the core, run our asses off, and then start rebuilding again from the ashes. We could live in teepees for a while, at least until foreign aid comes to help us reestablish a working infrastructure...

+2

Love your thinking... I'll fashion wooden spears if someone can burn the books for heat.

I agree with every one except #8. Just because somebody downvotes everything doesn't mean they should be deleted. If an account is not an alt, then it should never get banned based upon how it votes on other sites.

+2

If all they do is vote 1s then they're obviously there just to be asshats.

+1

Every website has those type of users and there is really no way to avoid them. Yeah, it is ridiculous that some users only vote 1 on everything, I agree with that, but overall there is no rule that says that you cannot one star everything, so there is nothing anyone can do about those type of users.

time to make that rule then?

all great ideas

0. Make sites that are funny. That, and follow the dream I had last night - get bowling alleys to put the YTMND logo on the pins. (Awesome dream)

+4

ytmnd sponsors sports? Max take a note: College bowls = $ I could see ytmnd on some hick's racecar.

+2

SPORTS!!!!!!

oh and how about F*CKING MERCHANDISE ALREADY!!!! I have seen *one* person in my entire life wearing a YTMND shirt and I have no f*cking clue how he got it

+1

Tim & Eric reference + great song = perfect world. ...ya I totally say we email Max as the financial and marketing team.

Where's my YTMND store?

no more than FIVE'D votes

I was surprised to find that the song was really well synced at the end; the song restarted at the exact same time as the rest of the YTMND. It wasn't neccessary (it's justbackground music, right?), but I guess you wanted to set a good example.

Get rid of the featured user section all together, all it does is make people pissed off. It was created to counter the huge influx of NARVs way back when, it's not really needed now. Get rid of comment votes, they're just useless. Bring back and improve the worthwhile section, there are so many awesome sites that were topped viewed for about a day and then fell off the face of the earth.

-2

I concur

this site will be killed™

you spelt lcad's name wrong

The truth is out there......only if people will listen.

I should be deleted.

11. Attach high voltage alligator clips to the tiny testicles of downvoters and attention whores. Oh wait, they'd enjoy that too much, nevermind.

how do you think i feel?

+1

I wasn't saying you were crappy with the black comment....

-2

I agree with all of this stuff, but shouldn't this be in the forum?

Disagree with 9 and 8 very strongly. Sometimes people make series, it's hard enough with a 15 minute limit when you have it all prepared.

Great pace. For once I could actually read everything on the screen before it flashed to the next. I'm a little tired of that damn song though.

+1

It is wrong to try to control and moderate how people vote. Alts need to be controlled not some stupid Hulk-Hogan gimmick account who attacks everyone once in a while. Even finding alts can be a problem because sometimes they are just friends, not alts. Frankly I find people who only vote 5s and 1s to be the bigger idiots.

+2

Featured users need to be dumped and forgotten about. It's a good concept, but poorly executed. There are too many people on there that have no business being there. People with one or two good sites (meaning rated higher than 4.0) out of 20 should not be featured. Plus it brings too much attention to the user instead of the site.

+7

featured status should be more of a revolving door, with people who, during any set standard amount of time (ie monthly) EARN featured status. if their sites continue to be successful they never lose status. if they suck, they 're dropped. i'm no smart guy, so i have no idea how hard something like that would be to pull off, so i'll assume that it's too much work.

+1

also 5'd solely for exposure, these may not be the best ideas, but they're a start

+1

double also just realized it's been sponsored, so... whatever.

+1

Give us back the Worthwhile ytmnd section!

Fix the worthwhile, then bring it back. That is the only reason I haven't put it on my front page.

VOAT 5

Mods are the other tricky issue. You can't just let anyone be a mod. I know Max wants people he can trust and who will help with the site. Lets say the Britzman became a mod last year. Remember when he went berserk, created an alt and started revenge downvoting everyone who didn't like his sites? Imagine if he had mod abilities...

+1

im still using downvote man's weapon LOL

+2

5

-1

I so agree to all of this...

-2

i can see how this would work... and i usually post sh*tty-decent YTMNDs.

+1

More colors would just confuse things. Also the preloader works more like 90% of the time...at least in Firefox I think

5'ed and faved

+1

Honestly though, ever since the facelift the site has gotten, it has gone to the sh*tter. It seems 90% of the improvements are not necessary and only seem to exist to satisfy Max's craving to code something new.

+1

True.

you should be an admin

Nice. I enjoyed this

Me and all my alts are very against this. I'm going to go upload 22 sites within the next our expressing my distaste.

+1

If the mods and featured users weren't just a list of Max's favorite people then things might be different. I bet nothing changes. Max doesn't care.

+3

^ This

max doesn't care about brown people

+3

ytmnds still get enough votes to make it on Up and coming. But there is much less traffic than there used to be.

lol i cant wait until one of the featured users goes nuts.

-2

I can't wait till zorg defends himself.

+1

lol i cant wait until one of the fea...oh wait, nevermind.

I have to say I agree with alot of stuff on there, and I think there are many new YTMNDs that I really like. I'll find a site that's good everynow and they can be funny, but none of them have fads or anything. Ytmnd is missing fads now. NSMB, Batman uleule, Picard. nothing like that anymore. The only fad I can think of ytmnd last had was Sparta. I don't like the idea of deleting users who give over 50% voting 5, I like the sites I vote on and if I don't like one I just leave.

MAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATTLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

Why the hell does Tkx7 deserve to be gold? He's one of the worst offenders out there.

+2

4 because I agree with some of this stuff but not all of it

+1

You're the man now dog.

This assumes there's something wrong with YTMND.

-3

Have fun shouting into the void.

+1

Thanks for the sponsor Bigun!

+2

You're an emo kid irl, aren't you...

-3

This may sound crazy, but I agree with everything.

but some featured users are already "black (crappy user)"

-2 because zorgzorg is a good guy and because your number 1 solution wasn't a solution.

+1

I'm a good guy. Can I be featured please?

Go make sites until 1 becomes popular. It will take between 1 and... and... how many sites was steakman up to again?

around 2,000,000

1,999,998 fractals. an electronic equivalent to fireworks to the mass of rubes goin oooh ahhh i smookkkkkeeee weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeed and this is coooooooooool.

I'm high myself right now

11. Make YTMND a political party

No. 1 didn't seem like a way to fix ytmnd.

We need Dr. Frankenstein up on this bitch

Also, we could definitely use 4. Has anyone else noticed that ytmnd was best at the same time that NARV's were in mass quantity? They suck *ss but they're the blood of the site.

-1

You are stupid.

+1

Not bad ideas. But you lost me on "Get more tv exposure". The kind of exposure you're referencing isn't the kind of stuff YTMND needs. We need more QUALITY users, not the *ssh*les of the internet. We've already got those. Also, max has addressed 1/2 this sh*t already. TODO list, motherf*cker. CAN YOU READ IT?

+2

I agree with 3, 5, and 10, completely disagree with 9. I think featured users should just be eliminated. Also, if anything, maybe replace it with a customized "favorite users" where you could pick who is on the list. And yeah, I don't think we really want exposure do to sites like "JEWS DID 9/11" or a raid of a stupid site like habbo.

+1

This fad is dead. Leave it that way.

lol

I'll admit, I never really got along with Anig, but his site really makes sense... 5'd... About "Account Control" for down/up-voters, I'd be cool if the site implemented accounts by restricting them to 1 account per IP address... That'd work...

I was paid $9.41 for my testimonial.

easier said than done

or you know, just get rid of the Featured Users section completely, I would love that very much

+4

I couldn't Agree more with these awesome suggestions.

Kwitcherbitchin

y so srs?

-2

epic D adding maneuver

+3

I agree with most of what you said.

Anyone else notice how Twilight Singers sounds like GBV on Quaaludes? (I dated a girl who f*cked Greg Dulli. Does that make me gay?)

I love how GBV were always drunk during shows (awesome) yet rocked hard as f*ck and never missed a beat. Major League Drinkers.

A bucket of beers on stage. It was in their rider. I saw them at the Empty Bottle for a NYE show years ago (the Strokes opened and no one knew who they were, if that tells ya anything) and they did Baba O'Riley as an encore, pretending they were actually The Who. It was pretty funny.

I've got a boot of that song but not the whole show. Last time I saw them was on the EC farewell tour in Dallas. They had one of those freestanding coolers you find in a convenience store, usually filled with 20 oz. bottles of coke or something, filled with miller lite. How they still played an hour long encore after drinking that much is impressive.

i before e except after c. also, no way would I want the between sites time to be an hour. I still think 15 minutes is too long. there was also some other stuff I didn't like

-3

there's no reason you should have to post stuff that often, this isn't myspace.

-1

quit harshin our buzz man, trying to put restrictions on our artistic expression

+1

lol I was drunk when i made that retarded comment

-1

lol I was watching the Olympics when I made that comment (that I still agree with)

+1

I do too, but the way i worded it sounds dumb to me now.

-1

1'd now because max listened to you

ok nevermind, back to my original vote because I feel bad

Just get rid of featured users.

+2

DING DING DING DING DING DING DING!!!!! Been saying this since it has been established!

+2

I would say instead of just getting more automaters, have a system that would ban you if you make all 1 star votes over so many votes, ban accounts that are coming from an IP that has several other accounts on it. Kills downvoting and alt spamming. Better yet, delete sites that have a rating lower than 3 and/or views under 3,000 within a month. Don't need YTMND spammed with crappy sites ("artistic" bullsh*t aside).

Also, you could keep a site around if it has so much sponsorship. People want to give YTMND sh*t sites, they can pay for the bandwidth.

agreed, number 8 isnt set in stone, that's why I put the: or something after it

Amen.

can you squeeze in "free blowjobs for all", maybe instead of more tv exposure

I agree with the exception of deleting users with over 500 votes. I have been here since 2004 so I probably have way more. 5/5

deleting users should always be done with discretion. Also 8 wasn't set in stone. Apparently 1 was wrong too. ^_^

5'd for thebigbaka

Gentlemen, we have the technology, we can rebuild YTMND.

We just should've made ptkfgsmaster2maryo mod. You all had your chance.

YTMND also needs less sites like this. Here's a 1 from a user with over 500 votes.

the pre-loader works for me 100% of the time. Also fix the damn search, it is just painful to search for some ytmnds that are labeled by retards(exactly like this site with NO keywords).

11. Ban OmniIcyshelf

+1

HEY LOOK AT ME ..LOOK AT ME ..LOOK AT ME! *WAVING ARMS AROUND*

+1

when good advice meets Greg Dulli the five stars of heaven come out to play

ytmnd serious business

i was gonna give you six stars but then i couldnt find that button so you get five. lol maybe we should invent a sixth star....

http://thiscouldreallydoit.ytmnd.com/

Indeed sir, that is the only way to save YTMND.

Starting at 5 ------------------ • Terrible music (-1) • Hyphenated the word account? use return. (-1) • "A proposal by Anig" referring to yourself in the third person (-1) • Your GUI mockup looks pretty brutal (-1) • Temporary and updated featured users, great idea (+1) • Deleting people for downvoting? What is this, Oink? (-1) • Aliased text (-1) • Fix preloader, good idea (+1) • Being wrong on #1 (+2) Total: 3/5

-1

Most of those are terrible reasons to decrease your rating

The South Shall Rise Again! YEE-HA!

Moderators have no control over accounts.

Defintely get rid of the the featured users. I've clicked on many a featured user site, and I would say 70% or more of it is just random sh*t. I don't even understand why the exist. Is it because they made a few good sites, that most of their sites will be worthy? If that is the case, abolish featured users.

I don't think we should completely abolish them, I think it gives us something to work toward and an incentive to make better stuff. I do think the way it works now is definitely broken.

Vote #5

yes on 10 no on 9 . gj gj ppl

Here's a tissue, blow your nose or cum in it. F*ggot.

Users like you are part of the problem, 41 sites and only 2 with over a thousand views. 90% of your sites are rated under 2. What a waste of space and bandwidth.

+1

great proposal. needs some powerpoint