Currently viewing  
 
KiwiMango's profile:

Last Online:October 2
Member Since:2006-05-19

Sponsorships this user has made:$0.00 ($0.00 in fees)
Sponsorships their sites have received:$0.00 ($0.00 in fees)

 KiwiMango's most recent sites:
Title Views Votes Rating
?  (nsfw) this is not cp9279
(2.67)
?  this isnt cp98513
(3.00)
?  ptkfgtfo3409
(3.11)
?  Snakes on a Cake73837
(3.08)
?  (nsfw) shoe on...1,58410
(3.70)

 KiwiMango's highest rated sites:
Title Views Votes Rating
?  (nsfw) shoe on...1,58410
(3.70)
?  Sean Connery luvs animals43524
(3.29)
?  ptkfgtfo3409
(3.11)
?  Snakes on a Cake73837
(3.08)
?  also tits3,03425
(3.04)

 KiwiMango's most recent comments:
Site When Comment
2006-11-02 02:59:03
 
If persons, for the most part, can behave maturely around adult women in bikinis, why can't the same be done around underage girls in the same attire? Instead it is wrongly deemed as smut, innapropriate material, or pornography. In my opinion, this is a display of childhood innocence, not sexually oriented content.
+0 [replies: 0]
2006-11-02 02:55:15
 
What I am doing is pointing out that this is not child pornography. It may be offensively lewd and disgusting to some, humorous to others, and to some extreme end some may find it erotic. However it is in no way pornographic. Go ahead and downvote because you do not like the content. I am not trying to present content; I am making a point, though in lieu of what you say, I realize that perhaps I did not make the point clear enough.
+0 [replies: 0]
2006-11-02 02:38:44
 
if you can't appreciate child modeling as an art form, then you might be a pedo
+0 [replies: 0]
2006-10-01 22:21:18
 
1 for pornography
+0 [replies: 0]
2006-09-05 21:16:13
 
1 for entertaining me, 1 for original (afaik) music, 1 for making me giggle, 1 for content
+0 [replies: 0]