that have been moderated by the chosen moderators. First offense: 1 day, Second offense: 1 week, Third offense: 4 weeks, Fourth offense: Ban. Trolling comments and sites mocking certain YTMNDers should be governed by this system while multi-accounting is an insta-ban.

(continued) User moderation is the equivalent of the inmates running the asylum. Whoever has the biggest group of friends can yield great power over the site. That is why everyone hates downvoters so much and now we plan to give them a chance to moderate themselves? Personally, as people prove themselves to be trustworthy (how that is done I honestly have no idea ) they should be allowed to have moderation options. Limiting posting options should be done by a certain percent of posts that (continue again)

Victz's idea would not work for two reasons 1.) Groups of people could circumvent the whole system 2.) Some people (me as an example) do not post sites or many comments so using the star system is rather pointless in those cases What I would recommend probably will not be liked but is the only way the site can be governed objectively. You have to get together a group of YTMND users that you trust and feel are impartial and have them run the moderation of the site.

I see Uberbobbe used the same reasoning I did for my vote.

They have another weakness, Division 1-AA football teams.