Currently viewing  
 
who-are-you-working-for's profile:

Last Online:September 11
Member Since:2006-01-30

Sponsorships this user has made:$0.00 ($0.00 in fees)
Sponsorships their sites have received:$0.00 ($0.00 in fees)

 who-are-you-working-for's most recent sites:
Title Views Votes Rating
?  Jack Bauer-Phone70710
(1.40)
?  The pilot must have got a whammy...7945
(2.80)
?  Brian Pepper's Stalker!4053
(1.00)
?  Colin Mochrie's Blind Date5806
(1.50)
?  Jack Bauer Texas Ranger?1,8085
(2.00)

 who-are-you-working-for's highest rated sites:
Title Views Votes Rating
?  Dropkick Murphy's fail at watching movies2,29628
(3.86)
?  Ron Howard = Robocop?3,23919
(3.79)
?  Jim Cramer: ualuealuealeuale1,94014
(3.50)
?  Napoleon Dynamite under attack1,58422
(3.41)
?  What Would Jack Bauer Do?2,11113
(3.15)

 who-are-you-working-for's most recent comments:
Site When Comment
2006-05-31 11:01:05
 
5'd simply for having chris tucker and jackie chan in the picture
+0 [replies: 0]
2006-04-30 22:45:31
 
her name was carla...not linda...
+0 [replies: 0]
2006-03-08 12:44:28
 
I wish that were only true. In the jacket for the CD, they have the same lyrics and even mention that the only reason they kept in it is because it rhymed. So yeah, that means they fail.
+0 [replies: 0]
2006-03-02 18:13:37
 
This is the first site I've voted for...definitely badass.
+0 [replies: 0]
2006-02-24 11:33:55
 
that's not wilfred brimley, its richard riehle
+0 [replies: 0]