YTMND Search

 (1.00)

why the f*ck do sites based on gay-ass controversies, quabbling net battles and "petty grievances" get to be new fads and view-worthy sites? f*ck this sh*t, bring something original other than researching plaigarism...

 (5.00)

So, based on the fact you didn't know that, you're full of sh*t. GTFO.

 (5.00)

I 'lawled' and was ready to five this based on the text alone, before I even heard the sound. I was thinking the exact same thing when I read Neil's letter. The sound editing simply makes deserve an extra five.

 (5.00)

We are helping! We are helping! Someone should make a page based on that episode if possible.

I hate eBaumsworld. Max sure did shut him up and for good I hope. You know, a website based on submissions doesn't have to be bad. It becomes bad when the web owner claims property of the material. For instance, albinoblacksheep is basically like ebaumsworld but nearly all the content gives rightful crediting to the original creator.

 (0.00)

Parody of LOL Internet, based on SOE's blunders with Star Wars Galaxies. This is a Typical Day at SOE corporate office in Austin TX

 (4.00)

Best AW based YTMND.

 (0.00)

The crows in Dumbo were based off of black people... that doesn't count, does it? -_-;

 (5.00)

I based this one off of yours, imitation and flattery and all http://internetswar.ytmnd.com/

 (5.00)

5. Why do a 200 zerg rush when you can do FOUR HUNDRED?!?!?!?! 400 lings = absolute base slaughter.

 (5.00)

All your Base Edition?,With Cats singing and Captain saying "What you say?"

 (5.00)

Sitsu, I don't think you want my vote on this one. So I abstain. That said, don't shave away frames based on other peoples opinion. If it's funny to you keep it, if it's unfunny to you ditch it.

 (5.00)

I don't get it, but since you said what it's based on I can't take away any stars. It's interesting, regardless. What about Norris?

 (0.00)

Holy hell, look at the size of that zerg base on the minimap

 (5.00)

LOL! Now I get it! I remember the YTMND it was based on, the guy really does look the same. o_O

 (0.00)

re: cruise 'sanity' - no. cruise is already in there. re: bon jovi 'runaway' - no way dude, you miss the entire concept entirely. based on a video for this specific song.

Just an idea max, but how about allowing advertisers to purchase bannerspace on YTMND? I like most all of your ideas. However, I'd suggest posting in SH/SC over at SomethingAwful some of the coding based ideas so you could get an idea of how feasible it would be to program some of the features you're talking about. Hell, you might even get some goons to do work for you pro bono.

Auto-deletion based on ratings is a bad idea. There's a lot of very popular YTMNDs that don't have good ratings. I can understand deleting sites that don't get any views, though.

 (5.00)

"All your base are belong to me" - God

 (1.00)

If it makes sense to you, Azure, to five a site based on the comments, more power to you. I prefer to vote based on merit.

 (0.00)

Yes this was based on a true story. I think I've hit the cap on no. of songs though. Although I am still looking into adding more neighbor voices.

Auto-delete sounds ominous. Maybe base it on views per day w/sites being permanent after 1000 views or something.

 (5.00)

FREEDOM should be missing since 1984/2010 Being the ad was sort of based on 1984

 (1.00)

nws'd for wow based site

 (5.00)

4, add something about CATS and the missing base.

 (0.00)

^all your base isnt really a fad, and if you visited Runaway Meme, which i linked to, you'd see its covered there....

Wow, you raise a lot of good points and ideas. I can't suggest anything, because I really don't know how it all works on the inside. The only thing I can suggest is to implement one thing at a time, and based on what takes less or gives more bandwith, per se.

 (0.00)

"Is this based off of the rush song 'something for nothing'?"

Don't delete sites based on rating. That way all the e-vengers with 50 accounts win. Srsly. Other than that, everything looks great.

Oh, also, I HIGHLY suggest you don't give users privelidges (sp?) based on popularity of sites. You and I both know that 95% of popular sites are total sh*t. I'd say let the moderators have some say in what sites are good, since moderators aren't as f*cking stupid as most YTMND users. Of course, you'll have the final say, but a parliamentary kind of thing would work quite nicely, methinks.