YTMND Search

 (0.00)

I'm having a problem recently. When I tried to update the site, it gave me a error and now the YTMND is messed up. I'm trying to fix it up. Bear with me, everyone.

 (0.00)

Actually, Birdo is not male, there was a translation error in the booklet.

 (0.00)

Its not the sound-file itself, its a PHP error with ytmnd.com

 (3.00)

What is up with all these black YTMNDs?? Error i guess....3'd

 (5.00)

you people are complete idiots, he said it's because of ytmnd, he didn't screw up the sound, it's a site error, and it makes sense considering most of the sites don't work properly right now, and the sight was down for for hours last night.

 (5.00)

trapped by the error!

 (0.00)

for some reason, I get all of these errors and no sound or image is displayed

 (1.00)

Bad 404 page implementation. Errors should not redirect. What would be fun is if someone deleted this page.

 (2.00)

Boner is also used to describe an error. I hope you don't giggle like a schoolgirl everytime you hear Dick Clark's name do you?

 (4.00)

"Boner is also used to describe an error. I hope you don't giggle like a schoolgirl everytime you hear Dick Clark's name do you?" perhaps...

 (5.00)

"I'm warning you...you're entering a big error!" --MCP

 (5.00)

5 for window's error

 (4.00)

That was the best NEDM ever.By the way,I dicovered a spelling error.

 (0.00)

when the error popped up i moved my mouse to click it =(

 (5.00)

way outta sync, error sounbds dont match image

 (0.00)

go to download.com and get irfan view (free). between that and ms paint you'll be able to play with images a bit, it's what I use. Also shareware .gif software is nice, and a basic sound editor, a la wavepad, will get you started nicely. In any case, this ytmnd could be funny with less grammar errors, if you just delivered it straight with less "uh"'s, etc... but that's just my opinion.

 (0.00)

spelling error? Where? :X

 (5.00)

Brian May likes fat bottomed girls, Freddie Mercury only liked the cock. still funny with the error though

 (4.00)

A big divide-by-zero error that I've always been wondering about -- thanks for drawing attention to it.

 (5.00)

it wont work for me this error keeps coming up...

 (4.00)

-1 for your crucial error in judgement by adding that...horrible cat...

 (5.00)

window errors ftl but funny

 (1.00)

The error is fake. 1'd

 (4.00)

Decent, good attempt at neutrality. However: some grammar errors, and there's one frame full of text near the end that I'd like to read, except that it blinks by in a split second.

 (5.00)

Five because I suppose that the earlier discussion of deviance raises serious doubts about an important distinction in language use. Notice, incidentally, that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction is necessary to impose an interpretation on a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar. We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial cannot be arbitrar

 (5.00)

Five because we will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: the natural general principle that will subsume this case delimits an abstract underlying order. We have already seen that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is to be regarded as the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar. If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively inaccessible to movement, the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible t

 (5.00)

haha I love these types of sites. always fun to document a YTMND error/crash period

 (5.00)

On our assumptions, any associated supporting element is unspecified with respect to nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory. We have already seen that this selectionally introduced contextual feature does not readily tolerate a parasitic gap construction. Comparing these examples with their parasitic gap counterparts in (96) and (97), we see that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is to be regarded as a general convention regarding the forms of the gramma

 (5.00)

Note that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is to be regarded as the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar. Conversely, a descriptively adequate grammar is not to be considered in determining a descriptive fact. Of course, the earlier discussion of deviance does not readily tolerate a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test. Clearly, a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort suff

 (5.00)

We have already seen that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial does not affect the structure of irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules. I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features is not quite equivalent to a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar. By combining adjunctions and certain deformations, the notion of level of grammaticalness is not subject to the extende