YTMND Search

 (0.00)

As a personal opinion, I believe that the Bible is nothing but a book of moral codes and fairy tales. And the idea of God is just that: an idea. God did not create humans, but humans created God in their minds. The whole problem with proving God's existence is that the intellectuals who believe He exists only work towards finding counterexamples that defeat anything that naysayers of God have claimed, they don't actually provide any REAL proof. And the naysayers still sit around waiting for proof.

 (5.00)

It's about time someone said it. As I said before, any intellectually honest person will admit that there's a possibility of the existence of a God, but also that you can't prove this existence with 100% certainty. Well played.

 (1.00)

Flaw in your argument: Intellectual Masturbation.

 (1.00)

Both of you need to get a pin and deflate your egos. This isn't an intellectual debate, this is an "I'm better than you" quarrel.

 (5.00)

"^That's just my point, stupid. If you bring up African American people and insult them in a derrogatory way, you can't expect people to never ever bring up African Americans. I mean, come on. Don't be such a fool, I was hoping for a more intellectual challenge. :(" Oh please. My point was that *no one brings it up* -- because there's no way of making it funny. Similarly, people who can't figure out a way to make it funny to say "HAY GUYZ STOP MAKING FUN OF JESUS ;_;" should stop making f*cking YTMNDs about it and go back to calling into Rush Limbaugh's program and saying "I AGREE, THE WAR ON CHRISTMAS IS TERRIBLE!!!"

 (5.00)

also kingd you're a f*cking idiot. The fellation thing was a joke based on these premesis: a) Christians believe that it is sinful for men to have sex with other men, b) Everyone on YTMND is male, c) Christians on YTMND suck each other's c*cks incessantly, d) this is ironic for obvious reasons. Another ironic thing is that you accuse me of being stupid and incapable of intellectual debate when you, yourself, are clearly incapable of such a lofty goal.

 (0.00)

You actually think the majority of YTMND is above 12? Just kidding, but just as well, this is an intellectual [I guess], arguement, and it really doesn't belong on YTMND.

 (0.00)

Yeah, get a clue, you pseudo-intellectual.

 (4.00)

An initial cause does not imply an aware entity. All you've done is point out the paradox of the infinitely previous cause. Making up a supernatural answer to a difficult question is an intellectual cop-out. But you were much more intelligent and less patronizing than the others, so four.

 (3.00)

Dear YTMNDers: There is a forum for this sort of -- as one user aptly calls it -- intellectual masturbation. It's called USENET. It went out of style in 1996, about the time you kids were being weaned from yer Mom's titties. If you want to debate the existence of God, get some decent grades, go to university, and major in Philosophy. In the mean time, please make funnier stuff for me to read while I'm drunk. Yours truly, D. Wayne Love.

 (4.00)

Jesus Christ, there are some dense motherf*ckers around here...The charity isn't for Irwin's family. It's for conservation work. I can't believe a person could fail to understand that. And of course no one was intellectually shocked by his death; you hang around dangerous wild animals enough and the risk of death is going to escalate. I would imagine his daughter was repeating stuff she probably heard her parents say all the time, in that interview.

 (2.00)

lol, intellectualism

 (5.00)

And its our right to discriminate against em for it. I don't agree with actually having a war per se, a good cold war is my preference, but all people are subject to discrimination on their intellectual beleifs, just like what you are doing to those who are revving for a raid.

 (5.00)

Perfect, life IS out there. All it takes on our part is to be just a little bit more intellectual, and a little less concerned about our daily insignificances. Think about it...

 (3.00)

For those of you unaware, failure to not properly cite sources is PLAGIARISM and is a CRIME. citing sources is the difference between stealing another's work and claiming it as your own, and properly giving proper to the original creator and intellectual property owner of the work. it's what seperates YTMND from ebaumsworld.

 (0.00)

I've met Ingrid. Ever met somebody who really feels like they, and NO OTHER HUMAN BEING WHO WALKS THE EARTH, have a special mission in life - to speak for one cause, to be the voice for the voiceless, to ignore all other points of view by necessity because no one considers theirs, intellectually dishonest and solipsistic because of what they feel is a God-Given-Right to be ? No, you've probably never met anyone like that - then you meet Ingrid. She's all personable and nice, but you get the feeling that this is one woman who has NEVER, EVER had an orgasm and doesn't really believe they're real. (pls shrink img a wee bit, cuts off at the bottom, thx)

 (5.00)

But is it still intellectual copyright infringement if you profit from the use of this similar image? OMG you don't profit from YTMNDs in any way!?!? I guess that makes it FAIR USE.

 (1.00)

we get it you like art and are very deep/intellectual

 (0.00)

"God I'm sick of everyone pulling the attention card with sexymofo which isn't the case. He only 5's completely original/artistic YTMNDs." - YTMND isn't about art, no matter what anyone tries to tell you. sexymofo is just a psuedo-intellectual dipsh*t. Go home.

 (1.00)

So you think you are enlightened? In what way? Your actions show no signs of intellectual or refined thought.

 (1.00)

deep/artistic/intellectual

 (1.00)

"IMO, this 20sec vid with catchy music> semister long astron. class." I've already explained my reasoning for downvoting. HOWEVER, if you need to go to an Astronomy class to find out that the Universe is big, then there is something wrong. After realizing that a lot, not all, of the people who fived this never knew any of this...I now realize why intellectual sites that provoke thought get downvoted........*sigh*

 (5.00)

You sir, are an intellectual. That's good in this community and I award any efforts to push the limits of what a YTMND can be.

 (5.00)

its funny that people are trying to argue you this on an intellectual level while later on they will probably give "lol, internet" or an NEDM ytmnd a 5. GG f*gs.

 (1.00)

"sites promoting a consumer attitude" +1 for inadvertently funny pseudo-intellectual posturing. "Almost all absurdity of conduct arises from the imitation of those whom we cannot resemble." - Samuel Johnson

 (5.00)

Panda might as well be trying to give a detailed literary analysis on Beavis and Butthead, because this site is about on that same intellectual level in most cases. This site put a big smile on my face. Sometimes you just have to stop overanalyzing every little aspect of everything, else you find yourself becoming incredibly anal. Also: if you miss the so-called good ol' days, how might you consider a joke based upon a black man stealing a skinny white boxer's bike to be any more intellectually stimulating than a group of rogue piranha plants destroying the city?

 (5.00)

I 5 this for the presentation and thought provoking content. Now, I am not a religious man, but these testimonies are from people who generally didn't care for religion (even criticized it with smugness, at least when I do it, I do it eloquently and from a purely intellectual perspective). It should be known that that website with the index has an obvious Christian bias. What happens to the Buddhists? You never hear from other religions about this phenomenon, perhaps there is something to this?

 (1.00)

I'm tired of hearing of this psuedo-intellectual bullsh*t invading this website like everyone is a f*cking nobel prize winner in Physics. You guys have no future in these fields, so go get f*cked.

 (0.00)

Dude...I only wish that 'believers' would accept that God is looking for spiritual fruits, not religious nuts, and stop being *ssh*l*es (Not targeted to said spiritual fruit,) And that atheists and those with religions could share an intellectual, philosophical point without being getting flamed to the next millenium. This site is truly beautiful, it reminds me of dear things I have forgotten.

 (3.00)

I would love to 5 this, because it's well-done, and even as a Christian, I adore Carl Sagan. But I can't. Sites like this only fan the flames of anger between Christians and Atheists, and they don't need more fanning (and I have said this to Whetstone and his ilk as well). As a side note, I agree Atheists are capable of seeing the beauty in nature without religion, but I don't think "beauty" was Carl Sagan's point - actually, it was more of an intellectual way of saying "be excellent to each other.