YTMND Search

 (0.00)

ok, so youre telling me you vote based on how users vote? isnt that user voting? isnt that totally disregarding content? isnt that bringing in an element youre opposed to? why not vote on the site its self, not who made it??? i guess thats why you auto 1 me every time. but hey, youve only been complaining about who ruined this place and how and when........you clearly have a hypocritical agenda. so whatever maign, keep instilling in all of us how much of a troll you really are.

 (0.00)

ok, so youre telling me you vote based on how users vote? isnt that user voting? isnt that totally disregarding content? isnt that bringing in an element youre opposed to? why not vote on the site its self, not who made it??? i guess thats why you auto 1 me every time. but hey, youve only been complaining about who ruined this place and how and when........you clearly have a hypocritical agenda. so whatever maign, keep instilling in all of us how much of a troll you really are.

 (0.00)

ok, so youre telling me you vote based on how users vote? isnt that user voting? isnt that totally disregarding content? isnt that bringing in an element youre opposed to? why not vote on the site its self, not who made it??? i guess thats why you auto 1 me every time. but hey, youve only been complaining about who ruined this place and how and when........you clearly have a hypocritical agenda. so whatever maign, keep instilling in all of us how much of a troll you really are.

 (0.00)

lol yeah i understand it's very annoying but that's the entire intention :P And if you want to judge something based solely on how much work was put into it, that's fine. I just think if a site meets the intended point in a witty or creative fashion it should get a descent vote.

 (5.00)

base

 (0.00)

There is no point arguing if you will not even read responses. I vote based on if I think the site is funny or entertaining. Some users tend to make sites I generally find entertaining, just like some people generally like music by certain bands or books by certain authors. The fact that you think this is some kind of sinister conspiracy proves that you are paranoid

 (5.00)

this site is based on gr33nscr33n as man in hat and his mom as princes leia, and me as darth vader

 (0.00)

based on actual events

 (0.00)

At least we have physical evidence as a base for these hypotheses. The fact that humans sit around and talk about stuff like this, wasting time, not physically exploring space, should be insulting. We only have a few billion years of life-giving sunlight left, before the sun starts burning helium and grows so large and hot that the earth will be devoured by it. We need to start looking for new places to colonize, or we'll end up like the dinosaurs. Deities are the most insidious inventions in history.

 (0.00)

I agree with this guy. I am an atheist by definition, but god can be whatever you want it to be, no matter what you believe in. I like to think of everything in existence as energy. I'm no scientist, but the way I understand it is, everything that exists can be broken down into base molecules. Molecules can have their chemical bonds broken, releasing energy. Even the atoms that are contained in those molecules can be split or fused (think stars), releasing energy.

 (3.00)

If it were just the echo I would've given it a 4 anyway. Anyone who downvotes based on something stupid like that is just looking for excuses to downvote.

 (5.00)

(Based on Actual F*ggotry)

 (3.00)

help me how do i beat the part in strike team alpha where James Wong is escaping. everytime i drop the bride it says SANFU RETURN TO BASE

 (5.00)

i went with a date... she was excited about seeing it because we both have never seen a horror flick that has actually scared either of us... based on other peoples opinions, they hyped it up to be the scariest movie ever, however, it was basically an hr of creepy "home movie" footage followed by about 20 mins of somewhat-scary sh*t... i didnt even flinch, nor did she...

 (0.00)

Based entirely on the site title, I was hoping this was Raymond or something.

 (0.00)

This was a project I worked on with a friend, all I did was edit Chuck's face. He made the card itself, it was based off Meowth I think.

 (5.00)

and so was Swisher getting back into 2nd base on the pickoff attempt.

 (0.00)

your base are belong to us.

 (0.00)

I do not auto-5 any users, for example you may bring up Kacen but I have 1d tons of his sites. Moon Man sites are funny, at least usually. I don't give a f*ck if someone put 10 weeks of effort into a site if the end result isn't f*cking funny. I vote based on how much I like the individual site, that's all.

 (0.00)

And here come the idiotic f*ggots with a stupid grudge against me who vote based on the user and not the site

 (1.00)

so i guess the contest was based around this ytmnd... kind of a shoe in isn't it?

 (5.00)

Thanks so much for putting as much of the call up as you could. It's been incredibly useful for a horror game I'm designing based on the call, "Static".

 (1.00)

I like this site, but its accusation appears to be false. Either Omni was able to change the domain name of his old site, or else max based the idea for the contest on his site. Since I don't think the former is possible, that means his site is 100% legit as a contest entry. Am I wrong?

 (0.00)

surrealism had a point inasmuch as it had at its base a structuralistic rather than poststructuralistic philosophy. it didn't believe that Truth with a capital T was dead, it just thought it was lost.

 (0.00)

SeNtu Its mostly email based Mr...hes just sour cause of the slam site I made..I wont make anymore Tile: at least cube will rememeber having sex once he has it

 (0.00)

Its mostly email based Mr...hes just sour cause of the slam site I made..I wont make anymore Tile: at least cube will rememeber having sex once he has it

 (0.00)

Only f*ggots vote based on the user and not the site. BTW someone used alts to downvote all of the comments

 (1.00)

Based off the comments from 2005, I have concluded YTMND was gay that year

 (5.00)

its funny how you can tell what elements youre going to use in your next site based on what videos you just favorited on your 'tube account

 (5.00)

Yeah... except AFHV existed when there were no user-based websites for people to share content like this, and paid prize money to winners. Whereas sh*tblog steals peoples' content and profits off it, reposting the same sh*t videos everyone has seen with no credit to the author.