YTMND Search

 (4.00)

Based on that one gif image alone I can tell that you will fit right in.

 (0.00)

actually, ill base it off score if you want

 (5.00)

max like to gives ppls comments an A+, but feels it unnecessary to rate the site upon which the comment was based

 (0.00)

damn audio editing program wouldn't let me edit the base wav files. to shame.

 (0.00)

I based the audio on the site I got the image and sound from.

 (1.00)

c2mu1d68b3iwk821 <a href= http://rlcidwwca.us/p01/g >Us Navy Base In The World Map Sea</a> http://cxtcioqc.us/p0b/q <a href= http://khfcpl.us/kw4/1v >Free King Of Spades Clipart</a> http://otnzztdr.us/zg4/1e <a href= http://exbopnc.us/psa/29 >Bench Drill Press Singapore</a> http://nyllkwxrg.us/25c/r <a href= http://iygedtd.us/ujs/14 >Wolf Scout Clip Art Color</a> http://ehpywjx.us/17 <a href= http://nweoiy.us/28 >Bo Derek Free Video Clip</a> http://oljidf.us/bbh/1p <a href= http://ocrlurl.us/8ky/1t >Corporate Communications Plan Template</a> http://rlcidwwca.us/2a <a href= http://cxtcioqc.us/6w9/2f >Sonic Underground Episode Downloads</a> http://khfcpl.us/uw0/2a <a href= http://otnzztdr.us/pqz/1l >Small Cell Lung Cancer Bibliography</a> http://exbopnc.us/psi/1n <a href= http://nyllkwxrg.us/nxh/22 >Hp Scanjet 3550c Driver Downloads</a> http://iygedtd.us/hoh/29 <a hr

 (5.00)

5 because the base premise of the site itself is fundamentally flawed.

 (5.00)

Dr-L337 is covering his bases

 (5.00)

Someone should start a fad based off randomly interrupting sites with this sound clip. That would be f*cking hilarious.

 (4.00)

+5 for a creative Star Trek-based site, -1 for using French music. :)

 (0.00)

So because you don't like noise sites, they are automatically bad? You have a very high opinion of yourself. As for lying, http://usingaltstodownvote.ytmnd.com. You constantly deny it yet the proof is right there. Also how you claim I sent PMs asking you to vote 5 when they don't say that at all. And saying that I vote based on the user. And claiming that you don't lie. You're really just deluding yourself, I like to believe you're just f*cking around and don't actually believe all the sh*t you say

 (5.00)

well im only judging the amount of work our mods do based on the amount work "max" (supposedly) does.

 (0.00)

I can sum up all of your arguments in 3 points: 1. "You vote based on the user". Yet you have provided no evidence to back this up. 2. "LOL UR STUPID" 3. "LOL UR GAY" Your arguments demonstrate the intellectual maturity of a 12-year-old. The fact you actually think you're winning is hilarious.

 (0.00)

And again you repeat a lie that I've explained to you dozens of times. I don't send PMs that ask you to vote 5. I send PMs that say "why did you vote 1", the purpose of which is to annoy silent downvoters, not to get people to change their votes. Please quote any of my PMs where I told you to vote 5. And you have alt downvoted more than just me, you did it to r-nax too. Now please prove that I vote based on the user, which you keep claiming.

 (0.00)

So now that I finally call you out and show you my evidence while pointing out that you have none, you predictable retreat back to worthless insults. Calling someone stupid is one thing, but you have proven yourself stupid by your actions - that is, not understanding that winning a debate is based on having evidence, which I have and you do not. You can declare victory all day, but until you actually show evidence to back it up, you have already lost.

 (0.00)

There's more to winning an argument than simply declaring you've won. I have screenshots of you alt downvoting. I have comments where you admitted you vote based on the user. What do you have? Nothing. Try actually showing evidence that I vote based on the user, because all you have so far is nothing but conjecture.

 (0.00)

And it's incredibly ironic that you can call someone else a moron when you keep getting proved wrong over and over again in our little comment wars. Right, Mr. "I don't vote based on the user but I do downvote all sites by anyone I consider a troll"? You made both of those statements in the same comment and you still don't see the contradiction.

 (0.00)

Hey, I don't know if he alts or not, he's not my responsibility. But I don't, and I know you do. Also I think it's hilarious how you admit you vote based on the user but try to defend yourself by claiming I do too, when I've explained several times to you that I don't, and you have no evidence that I do other than your personal opinion. If I voted based on the user I would have 1d all of your sites, but I have even 5d some of them. That makes me a much better YTMND user than you.

 (0.00)

Wait, you downvote people's sites just based on the user, and use alts, and flame everyone, yet he's the *ssh*le?

 (0.00)

First of all, a lot of people like my remixes, just because you don't doesn't make them bad. And it looks like you stereotyped all of my sites based on only the last 3 I made. Because I have made scores of different types of sites. I would list them here but there isn't enough room. In fact, only 8 of my last 30 sites fit your (rather wide) categorization

 (0.00)

You do realize you just contradicted yourself in that comment, right? You say you don't downvote based solely on the user, then you say you downvote "trolls", meaning you downvote any site by anyone you perceive to be a troll, based on the user and not the site. It's a bit hard to buy your claim of being a genius when you don't even realize that you just contradicted yourself.

 (0.00)

Hey, I admit I'm not the most well-behaved, upstanding, contributing YTMND citizen ever, but at least I don't downvote with alts, or downvote people's sites purely based on the user that made them, or any of your other trollish behavior. Take that plank out of your eye before addressing the speck in mine.

 (0.00)

"No actually I'm a genius - you're a retard" - Well you know what they say, the fool considers himself wise, while the wise man knows himself to be a fool. You prove that beyond a doubt. BTW I vote 5 on sites I consider to be entertaining. The fact that certain users tend to make those sites is purely coincidental. If you made a site like that and I found it amusing, I would 5 it. Which automatically me a better user than you, since I wouldn't be discriminating based on the user who made the site.

 (1.00)

You are without a doubt one of the worst active YTMNDers right now. I know that's an incredibly mean thing to say, but I'm being completely honest. Almost all of your sites have to contain one of more fads. It's like you have no original thought in your head. You can't even think of a good ____'d site and any material can be turned into a _____'d site. Even worse than jumping on new fads, which is understandable, is you keep making sites based on old fads, thinking you are being original.

 (5.00)

lol, yep. I 1'd like two of his very early sites (essentially based on my opinion of the sites), he immediately mass downvotes me in return. It's clear I'm not the only person he's done this to. I have more to say but I don't want to fuel additional drama. As ryanmontana said, there's more standpoints in the comments section of seriousjoke.ytmnd.com.

 (1.00)

My taste is amazing, while your taste seems to be crap, based on this site

 (1.00)

i think i can safely one this based on how annoying that sound clip is.

 (0.00)

essentially hes saying he votes based on his awful taste, rather then skill involved in site creation. I can support that stance.

 (5.00)

I vote based on prefrence to humor and values. I'm not saying that upvoting is good or bad thing to do, but I am saying that doing it all the time takes the value out of it.... but then again you do counteract downvoters a little bit, so....

 (0.00)

If you read the YouTube link I provided on my site's description, you'll see it is VERY different, and my YouTube video clearly states it is NOT based on that Tachin guy's WRONG mix. So, h*nkth*r*pp*r is WRONG, or maybe he's deaf, can't distinguish between two VERY different remixes. And Keaton is the BEST YTMND'er ever.