?PETA wants war.. (apparently) |
UpvoterTom |
(4.33) |
16,967 |
2006-09-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
PETA is probably the biggest cult in the world, even bigger than scientology. And now they insult steve irwin? Sounds like Hugo Chavez or Noam Chomsky or those other dickheads
|
?Xenu |
Klyke |
(2.40) |
867 |
2006-10-23 |
comment by:
rating given:
(4.00)
comment:
+5 for bashing Scientology, -1 for the sound not working.
|
?Xenu |
Klyke |
(2.40) |
867 |
2006-10-23 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
+5 for making fun of scientology
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
The South Park episode "Trapped in the Closet" was more of a milestone than this piece of sh*t movie. And even years before that episode aired you could easily find the Xenu story and the rest of Scientology's shenanigans on the internet, so what's the BFD?
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
okay the film is sh*t, but i'm downloading and seeding and watching it anyway, just to support the fight against scientology
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
note, I am not saying any of the current downvoters are such plants, but Scientology does use plants on message boards/etc...
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Cricket - there are Scientology plants over at a few Boston Legal forums too (ever since Boston Legal did the show that blabbed the Xenu story a week back) Saying they are not Scientologists but only registered the DAY of the show or shortly afterwards in order to question the accuracy. Saying "Xenu" isn't one of the teachings, etc... Some other ones are just simply spamming with random absurdity when somebody makes a good valid point about the "church". May sound odd, but it is so fecking obvious over thre
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
I wonder how many of the people on the site who are giving this 1's are really Scientology plants.
Most of the people who gave it really low scores and tell me i'm overblowing Scientology only joined around the time Max refused to by bullied by Scientologys lawers, and most of them have yet to make a single YTMND.
I'm not saying thats proof, I just think its a bit strange.
|
?Who Murdered the Most People? |
whetstone |
(2.27) |
92,185 |
2006-10-04 |
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
What, exactly, am I afraid of? I guarantee you that I live a better life than you do, morally. I don't really care whether or not you doubt that, I am responsible for my own actions and I always do what I deem to be correct. Is it that I fear being held responsible? Or is it that I don't wish to waste my life on something that I have no reason to believe? I have as much reason to believe in Scientology as in Christianity, which is to say none, and it would be WRONG for me to believe in either one of them...
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
the8ball - BZZZZZZZZZZZ! Wrong answer, try again. Have you even studied the crap that Scientology has done? If not, please do so before making such ill informed statements.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
And after watching that "documentary", they don't have any evidence to backup their claims about Scientology so its probably libelous. Therefore, trying to stop its distribution doesn't violate any First Amendment rights.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
Scientology is no different than any other cult and Tom Cruise is just as batsh*t crazy as the rest of Hollywood. This whole thing jumped the shark long ago.
|
?You Have Made Fun of Scientology for the Last Ti... |
handsanitizer |
(1.93) |
1,026 |
2006-10-22 |
comment by:
rating given:
(3.00)
comment:
yeah I agree, Xenu would've loved us making fun of Scientology, L Ron wouldn't like it.
|
?You have joked about scientology for the last time... |
MikealW |
(3.62) |
1,618 |
2006-10-22 |
comment by:
rating given:
(4.00)
comment:
"you have joked about scientology for the last time" as a title maybe?
|
|
?You have joked about scientology for the last time... |
MikealW |
(3.62) |
1,618 |
2006-10-22 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
has there even been jokes about scientology in the last.....6 months?
|
?You have joked about scientology for the last time... |
MikealW |
(3.62) |
1,618 |
2006-10-22 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Need more jokes about scientology
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(4.00)
comment:
The movie's kind of anticlimactic to be honest. Pretty boring. Just one of those kinds of things where someone thinks black and white= art. Still, anything anti-scientology deserves a decent rating. Down with the cult of scientology!
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
God damn Scientology Rushes, NO RUSH 20 MINS NUB!
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
And I make this promise now, any and all films they surpress are officially under my protection, and with the feedback from the YTMND community at large, they are ready to support me in my efforts. And that is where we are going to win, we will ALWAYS be able to out pace and out distribute anything that Scientology pulls to try to stop us. And we will teach them a lesson, THEY CAN NOT STOP US. They cannot bully people, they cannot surpress their critics. We will always fight them no matter where the battle.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Do I only support the films that EVERYONE agrees are compelling? That everyone thinks are important? Because if I do that WE WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO SUPPORT ANY FILM AGAINST THEM! People all have different tastes in film, I think this is a good movie, and a milestone, others think its boring garbage. But our differing opinions aside, Scientology sees it as a THREAT and that supercedes all other critques of the films for me. I will continue to support and distribute it no matter what.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
But the line MUST BE DRAWN HERE. We can't retreat, it doesn't matter if the film is complete and utter garbage, if its completely worthless, I am making the annoucement that I will fight to protect and distribute ANY AND ALL FILMS OR MEDIA opposed or supressed by Scientology. I make NO MEASURE of its aesthetic value, just that its against them. If I withdraw support of this film just because a few people think its boring, then what? Where do I draw the line for supporting films?
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
But this video is a milestone, and an important film to spread for THIS REASON... SCIENTOLOGY IS TRYING TO SURPRESS IT. The aesthetic and cinematic value of the film are made null and void at that point. It then becomes a matter of principle to support the distribution of the film. If we only support the films we unanimously agree are excellent, we are going to lose the battle here. This is a battle for freedom, and if we distribute it it can inspire people to make BETTER films.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
"The only people trying to surpress Scientology material is Scientology themselves." Hence all the L. Ron Hubbard books on sale and celebrities spreading 'the good word'? No. Sorry man, but it looks like you only thought this half-through, letting your (probably justified) hatred of Scientology blind and guide you. Stopping Scientology is a noble goal, but this movie isn't the key vital to spread the unstoppable truth. There's much better informative material out there. Spread that instead.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
I'm an atheist, but people who say scientology is the same as christianity, are idiots. Wake up people: the crusades happened because the moral codes of that time period are different than today. Its a completly different social context.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Don't be stupid. Sure Christianity may have done comparable thing throughout history, and they may be just as "wacky" as Scientology in their beliefs, but here is the major difference. 1. Christians don't CHARGE YOU to become saved, ANYONE can do it right now, they just have to pray that they accept Jesus into their heart and as their savior. No gay *ss machines, they never even have to go to Church, and bam they are saved. 2. Christians had a REAL PHILOSOPHER as their leader. Scientology just has a Sci-Fi.
|
?St4r WaRz 1337taZtic K1Tty Expr3sZ111!!! |
TAMBG |
(2.69) |
704 |
2006-10-22 |
comment by:
rating given:
(4.00)
comment:
I get the joke...but u shouldve had something to do with star trek and harry potter in there as well, and maybe some anti scientology/athiest stuff as well as they always seem to be big 5 getters a well
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Christianity is just as bad - if not worse than Scientology. People are just way too blind and stupid morons not to see it. -_-
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Yes, I would fight for it. I would think it would be important for any critical thinking person to see it, to see how deluded and manipulative they are. There would be no truth in it so it would be delightful to watch it and laugh at their horrible reasoning and lack of facts. I support the distribution of a variety of Scientology propaganda, because it only shows how ridiculous they are.
The only people trying to surpress Scientology material is Scientology itself, because they know how ridiculous.
|
?...inside your rectum |
bennitobasciano |
(2.67) |
1,393 |
2006-10-21 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
No, it was Chef's last episode I believe..well the one before this one was his last one. He left the show after the makers made fun of Scientology..Chef being a scientologist left the show.
They made this one by putting all his sound clips together. It was a God damn hilarious episode.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Also, if Scientology made a feature film depicting how fantastic and wonderful they are, and how the mainstream media and various websites *ahem* are trying to silence their happy message, and it got banned, would you fight for it, too?
|