?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
The fact that it's 'the first feature length film critical of Scientology' alone doesn't make it a 'milestone' either. Being the first in something doesn't automatically turn it into a milestone. I could make the first feature length movie about how pineapples are good for you, but that wouldn't make it a milestone. Everybody already knows pineapples are good for you, and the merits of pineapples are often discussed through various channells. Thus, there's no point to my irrelevant and unimportant film.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Sorry, guy, but it's just not that special. I can turn on the tv any day and see people criticising that crappy cult. Everybody who is not already in Scientology knows that they're a scam. Tom Cruise and John Travolta are mocked regularly in the media for their devotion to it.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
They TRIED to surpress YTMND, I didn't say they succeded, but they tried to bully Max around with legal threats, and he laughed them off.
They arn't going to be succesful in surpressing this film either.
And this film IS a milestone because its the first feature length film to ever be released critical of Scientology, thats why its a milestone.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
"Like they did with YTMND"? I don't see YTMND vanished without proof of it ever existing. Anyway, there's loads of criticism of Scientology all over the media. This film isn't some major milestone.
|
?The Un-Funny Truth About Scientology |
smoothmedia |
(4.65) |
2,110,867 |
2006-06-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
scientology is some sick sh*t
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(2.00)
comment:
Uh... this is a fictional dramatization of 'actions' of the Church of Scientology. I'm not really seeing any primary source information, or any researching at all. Where's the EVIDENCE that scientology is bad? You can't just have an actor call up a fake Ford Harrison Hotel as somebody's dad, play that sad music from the end of the Incredible Hulk, and then say it's a milestone against Scientology. Lisa McPherson and the backlash from her relatives was a milestone. 2 for effort. Might watch more later.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
http://scientology.chrisbox.com
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
LOL, Scientology
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
Scientology sucks more then that f*cking video i just wasted an hour of my life on.......would be better if it was made like loose change 911....1'd for wasing my time. a f*cking closet? i dont get it.
|
?Falkor NOOO! |
smoothmedia |
(4.20) |
28,196 |
2005-12-27 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
lol, the scientology guy made this?
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
This is a grevous violation of freedom of thought.
Destroy Scientology!
|
?The Difference Between Fiction and Reality? |
DaBest13 |
(3.64) |
2,642 |
2006-10-19 |
comment by:
rating given:
(4.00)
comment:
HAHA! Also funny, if you go to the actual site, there is a blurb down below about how Scientology removed "The Bridge" from the internet.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
...being discussed, what the YTMND is all about isn't that "OMFG THIS IS THE BEST MOVIE EVAR!!!11", its that this is a film which an organization has illegally been trying to surpress. An organization that has tried to do the same thing to YTMND. So regardless of if everyone loves the film, what is important is this is a piece of surpressed cinema. Its relavent because its a milestone in a variety of ways, not only is it the first film critical of scientology to ever be released, it is being attacked.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
...another scientology video to burn my ass. Is it so wrong for me to want to slap these people silly?
|
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
F*ck *ssh*les who say the movie sucks. First of all as cricket has said many many times, thats completely irrelevant. Secondly if you are looking for a lighting rod, thats obviously not what the movie was intended for. Its one thing to think a movie sucks on its own terms, but another to say it sucks by other terms. It seems to have been created as a character piece about how depressed people can look for anything to beleive in, not as some thing to chronicle of the crimes of scientology. Seen in this light
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Pberg, This isn't a conspiracy theory. If anyone thinks that the crimes that Scientology continually commits to surpress freedom of speech is a "conspiracy theory", then they are totally ignorant. Do I have to remind you that they threatened legal action aginst us for critisizing them? Its not a "theory" its FACT that any real YTMND'er knows is true.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
pberg - I take it you haven't researched Scientology then? That is what I thought.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Lulz "The N*gg* is the only thing that can outrun both G-d and Scientology. "
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
INDEED LETS SPREAD IT LOL SCIENTOLOGY
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Boston Legal did a few things about Scientology recently, not much but it is a start! http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xiozi_scientology-boston-legal
|
?The Fear Of Death |
Kahalachan |
(3.83) |
1,984 |
2006-10-19 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
I know this YTMND isn't funny, so the 1's are fine. There could and should be more genres. Like philosophical. We already have the genre of coolness with some of the science YTMNDs. I would personally love to see a good horror YTMND. That would be a challenge. The Unfunny Truth of Scientology is the closest one I can think of.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(2.00)
comment:
I'm bored with Scientology. If dumbasses want to dump their money into it because it makes them feel good, then let them.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
Do you people actually still care about Scientology? For the love of god move on.
|
?Cosby Saves YTMND User Identity |
xxblindchildxx |
(4.25) |
36,492 |
2006-06-25 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Scientology is defeated!
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
This film kinda blew ass. It doesn't tell how it is it just shows what a small part of it might look like. A 5 minute film that does nothing but tear apart Scientology would be more effective than this hour n' 10 minute crap fest. No wonder Scientology is trying to censor this video, it makes their cult look BORING. I'd think that for a cult Scientology would have some perks to it than what this film presents. After watching, one will think Scientologists commit suicide out of boredom.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
I didn't "put you in your place" and I havn't tried to surpress your speech. I'm merely telling the truth, to try to compare the evil criminal and terrorist actions undertaken by a fake religion which is really nothing more than a criminal enterprise who murders and tortures disenters; to a film which critisizes that organization, it utterly stupid. And for you to try to compare my humble comments to the actions of scientology is simply further idiocy.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Yeah, awesome Cricket! Anyone who doesn't share your opinion and has the temerity to voice their own should DEFINITELY be put in their place! Way to not be like Scientology.
|
?Transformers Nerds Threaten War?! (changed mu... |
altaccount |
(3.98) |
21,674 |
2006-10-18 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Yeah, we here at YTMND stared Scientology in the face, spat in it, and laughed. I'm pretty sure we can handle some Transformers FanBots.
|
?First Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster |
Caudice |
(1.67) |
1,017 |
2006-10-18 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
I'd join over Scientology
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
YAY!! Scientology fails.
|