?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
I can't believe Scientology is still popular. It's like Pokemon for celebrities. Hopefully it'll be gone by 2008. Nevertheless, this was a good YTMND.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(4.00)
comment:
I would never have watched the film if Scientology didn't try to suppress it. Wow, they're their own worst enemy.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Also, think about it, if Scientology is afraid of such a tiny "boring" film... What else are they afraid of?
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
I think that YTMND working on a video version of the unfunny truth would be worth it big time. There are so many things we could focus on rather than the few topics that Smooth was constrained too because of time constraints.
I think explaining to people when you give them the video, that this is just a film that Scientology is surpressing and that they should spread it around, and then give them links to the UnFunny Truth would be a good course of action.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
If you pass this out at your school, people who actually go home and watch
this, will probably stop 10 minutes into it (if even). Just print out a
sh*t load of links to "The Unfunny Truth about Scientology."
It'st true. This video does sh*t. Better make videos on the Unfunny truth about scientology and post it everywhere.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(3.00)
comment:
Id love to spread the anti scientology word, but this is a terrible, terrible boring film
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Time to gank scientology!
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Eh. The acting was poor and frankly, I was hoping for a documentary. BUT the fact that Scientology has attempted to censor this means they see it as a threat. Thus, this has become another tool against their nazi ways (and I think the Nazi comparison is valid.) 5'd.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Another Scientology fight? Don't those guys ever give up...
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
But really, why would Scientology care if it 'sucked'? They care so much because they see the film as a THREAT, not because its poorly made. If it was a slopshod piece of crap film that they felt wouldn't warn anybody about their evil bullsh*t, do you think they would be doing so much to surpress its distribution?
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
I thought you said you were drunk in one of the posts up above lol. Oh well. You (or someone) should make a documentary in Michael Moore style (sans burritos) to expose scientology for what it is!
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
We need some Anti-Scientology Michael Moores. Crazy *ssh*l*es that can make inflammatory and intense films that involve them ambushing Scientology robots.
Hopefully without you know, the bending of the truth, or the assholiness. Just someone who can focus a lot of hate and anger at the Scientologists and make something compelling.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Exactly. The problem with Authoritarian systems (like Scientology) is that they topple more easily from educating the masses then fighting, action, diplomacy does... What this means is small frys like us have the power to actually do stuff. If I made a movie about Scientology, it would be a documentary. I think that a topic this big can be expressed in a documentary and still be interesting.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Will do Captain!
Die Scientology!
If religions are to fight eachother, can they at least fight scientology first?
|
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
I understand completely Nitros, and I hope that this definately inspires others to create their own Anti-Scientology films. They can shut up one or two low budget film makers, but what happens when there are thousands of us all throwing Anti-Scientology Films onto Google video, and YouTube?
They might be able to scare one or two of us into "submission", but they can't stop us all.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Um.... not like I actually want to spend the time, but I have some pretty damn good connections and I too am 18. I could have made a better movie. The 6 I have made (short and to the point) are more interesting. If I wasn't at college, I'd gladly take up the challenge of making a Scientology Movie. Back home there's a Church of Scientology about half a mile from my house. It's probably doing well because it's in the wealthiest city in the state. Maybe next summer... or I could start over winter break
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
No Nitros, its the same film. What is important isn't that the film is fantastic, its that Scientology sees this little, no-budget film, by an 18 year old as a THREAT. And we should SPREAD this threat. If this can spur just one persons heart against the lies and evil of Scientology, it does its misson, and as YTMND'ers, people who care about freedom of speech above few other things, its out duty to make sure they are shown that they can't push people, especially those who create art they don't like, around.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
If you pass this out at your school, people who actually go home and watch this, will probably stop 10 minutes into it (if even). Just print out a sh*t load of links to "The Unfunny Truth about Scientology."
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
By the way, I've noticed how enthusiastic you guys are about the movie. This is the one I'm watching: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2998511003310284029&q=%22The+Bridge%22+scientology Is it possible we aren't seeing the same one?!? lol
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Ok, I'm currently 50 minutes into the video... and, allow me to say this. While I plan to continue watching, I'm bored out of my mind. If we are going to spread the word, we need to understand that we need a powerful and interesting example. This movie thus far is not as useful as the "Unfunny Truth about Scientology." I would suggest that you check the video out for yourself, but be prepared to be a little bored. I'll comment as soon as I'm done with the movie.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
While the quality may be low for some, this movie is a milestone in that it was made rather successfully by a young person plus it showcases some genuine problems with lower level Scientology. Just thing of it this way, one of us who is tech savvy or a good filmmaker/etc could make another. Bottom line though, the cult wants to remove this because it doesn't want people to see it. Thus spreading it to show that the cult can go f*ck itself when it tries to stiffle the truth is optimal
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Pi + BF1942 + Scientology = Win
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Scientology sucks, but so did this movie.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Scientology sux
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
I would love to see this movie... however, your links don't work. (I'm not going to hate you because of it) I can only assume that scientology is behind it.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Dr-L33T is the only one who downvoted this site. That f*cking gay communist scientology-loving douche bag f*g
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Continue the fight against Scientology! This is one war that I thoroughly approve.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
I will answer the call, f*ck scientology.
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
she spelled xenu as zeenu.. whatever scientology sucks
|
?Scientology Censorship: The Bridge 3.0 |
Cricket |
(4.59) |
89,650 |
2006-10-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(4.00)
comment:
I think we need to find an alternate way of distribution, because if someone reads digg or watches youtube or has even had the thought to do a google search for "scientology" before getting caught up in it, then that person is probably someone who would not be fooled or is someone who has heard of the real scientology before.
|