YTMND Search

 (5.00)

I Highly blieve in God, but there is a point in that, not matter your atheist or Catholic Jew, Satnist. or a bird we need to stang together for our lvies. Anyoen could be right, maybe there is no God, Maybe there is but if we play for a roll on this 50 50 chance and lose we are screwed. So the only way to Completely Stay together and live is to make peace, and stand up and help each other, Now makeing fun of a religion is wrong, but we all have done it on YTMND. I admit it! Anyone else want to admit it?

 (5.00)

I check these comments weekly to see if there is a horsec*ck update. I am still disappointed. If I don't see gallons of Perissodactylic semen spurting all over that obnoxious bitch I will die an unhappy man. F*CKING DO IT NOW. HORSE. C*CK.

 (5.00)

"What of the next realm? what happens after you die? That is where the questions go unanswered for those without faith." Why? Why not have a SCINETIFIC inquiry into where consciousness lies, so that you DO know what happens? All you are saying is that, because you cannot conceive of a scientific solution to what are now "metaphysical" questions, there is not a scientific solution, and will never be. This is not faith, this is willful ignorence.

 (1.00)

who created god? why do you waste your time? there is a chemical in the brain that is released while you are dying that allows you to see everyting beautiful. for example: your dead parents? an angel? light? a gate to a beautiful place? it's just childish. people don't need this bullsh*t. christians, i don't mean to be cruel with words. i love you all ^_~. i just don't like religion, that's all. this YTMND upsets me. i hope you have a good day. don't kill yourself. but if you do, don't expect to see god.

 (0.00)

"My friend do you realize evolutionary theory has undergone some SERIOUS overhauls in the past 100 years?" You see, unlike the bible, science allows space for revision. There is data always being collected and with more data we get new ideas and revisions of past ones. Sure, the pieces of the puzzle aren't all there and probably won't be; however, just because it's not complete doesn't mean it should be disregarded. Science doesn't require faith, it just requires your eyes.

 (0.00)

Seriously, I don't have a problem with it... I *DO* find it hypocritical for 4channers (just for example) to shout "GTFO FURF*GS," in between sessions of fapping to tentacle-rape underage transsexual in a tub of bloody guts hentai. I mean, what's the difference - it's all very sad and pathetic - no one is going to ever have sex with a real live horny big-tittied anthropomorphic dog-girl, cause there IS no such thing - any way you slice it, it's lusting over a drawing somebody drew.

 (3.00)

I under stand it is your opinion, but regardless this is a case of a fad reaching its own limits. Right now someone could create a lol, "something" YTMND that would be the funniest thing you have ever seen, but it is more likely that someone will make a lol YTMND that is not funny at all, cheapening the concept in itself. I say don't point your irritation against a fad all together, but rather those who would have spoiled a fad. Also there is little that can be done to change the taste of a group.

 (0.00)

To tell you the truth, I don't see the point that you are trying to make. So what if there is all this bad stuff going on within the little spec, it appearently is the the only spec out there that has anything going on period.

 (2.00)

To xJudgment: To exist is to not exist. No one can prove anything. To say there is no god implies that there is a possibility. And to say that there is a god implies that there is doubt in that, too. It's so complicated, yet so simple. It's silly when people try to go one way or the other, I find. I mean, we all do it, but I think we should realize how extreme we can be in our decision-making.

 (5.00)

While I respect the views of all religions (including atheists), I must say the time has come for both parties, atheist and other groups associated with their own religions, to end this dipute once and for all. This is a beautiful and truly humbling site. I myself am Christian, yet find there is room for both science and religion in my life. One cannot ignore the truth of Carl Sagan's words. Conversely, it is nearly impossible to not yearn for a meaning behind the beauty and immensity of the universe.

 (0.00)

"Crazy existentialist?" I'm not sure I know what the means. I mean that we are all physically,mentally, figuratively, however-the-f*ck-edly connected, and our separate sentience is just an illusion. I create you in my mind, and you create me. We are just thoughts, because that which we see makes up our thoughts. And our thoughts make up our minds, so there is no difference between mind and matter.

 (4.00)

He's trying to point out how insignificant we are and how tiny we are compared to the rest of the universe, yet he's treating the human brain like it's the apex of all universal knowledge. Coming to the conclusion that there is no god based on the fact that the Earth is tiny and that humans are the most intelligent beings in the universe (sans the possibility of aliens) is complete nonsense. (1) The physical size of the earth and everything on it is completely irrelevant. (2) ...

 (1.00)

You know, when you said this was supposed to be an "average ytmnd," I thought it would point out some kind of universal truth between all ytmnds, but there is nothing average about this. Fails.

 (1.00)

Considering that most of people here are under 25 years old, we will all die of various effects of the global warming before anything of that happens. There is no way humanity will survive for more than 200 years. Go capitalism!

 (5.00)

amazing!!!Great job!!!Your knowlage is massive, but...one or two erors in this over all, this make sanyone think about their lives, is it really worth going to work, if this will happen like it says it will? Hey if the earth goes inot the sun there is no reason to go to work :P 5 stars for owning the world you>world

 (0.00)

the thing about religious arguments is that they tend to refuse address and discuss possible contradictions to what one is trying to say. to avoid a mistake in logical reasoning like that is pretty much the status quo for college essays. hundreds of testimonies doesn't deny the possibility that all the billions of non-Christians who have died did so peacefully. if there is one case that can deny a premise, one is forced to reconsider the grounds for his argument. and i can testify for a few cases alone.

 (1.00)

i beleive in God and all this makes just perfect sense but there is a cause for everything and there is so many reasons why this could be wrong when jesus comes bak and if he does thats the only time i can really beleive this something out there did something to create this universe god?maybe but again there is no proof just theories well im done

 (0.00)

Like I said, I was making an argument. Don't get me wrong. There is an argument there. You also mentioned Zeus in your ytmnd, which leads me to believe that you were trying to disprove the existence of all gods, not just the Christian god (Zeus is neither omnipotent nor all powerful). In this you have failed. Why? Because Zeus is neither omnipotent nor omniscient. Thus, as I said, your ytmnd does not do what it sets out to do.

 (4.00)

Hebrew is written right to left, so all of the Hebrew writing there is backwards. Promise I'll bump it up to a five if you fix it!

 (1.00)

Oh great, whetstone is one of those REALLY dumb christians who thinks that he/she is just some great thinker of their time, and is some kind of persecuted martyr because they can disagree with all of modern science, and defend their position with propaganda. Poor whetstone, maybe he should go to one of the thousands or millions of christian websites, or perhaps he should go to a church, there is bound to be one every few miles...anywhere you go, in the usa. So let us have our annoyance free zone here.

 (1.00)

First off, not all things have causes. Read up on quantum physics. Second there are plenty of things besides a "Prime Mover" (Hello, Aquinas!) theory to explain the "beginning" of the universe. Cyclical big bangs and great crunchs stretching back into infinity, or if you'd read Hawking you'd know he says there is a 95% chance that the universe was uncaused. So yeah, you are wrong.

 (5.00)

Oh, and by the way, Infinity is right: All matter is bound energy. Meaning for the first couple fractions of a second of our universe, there was no matter.

 (1.00)

It is interesting to contemplate an entangled bank, clothed with many plants of many kinds, with birds singing on the bushes, with various insects flitting about, and with worms crawling through the damp earth, and to reflect that these elaborately constructed forms, so different from each other, and dependent on each other in so complex a manner, have all been produced by laws acting around us. ...There is grandeur in this view of life...

 (0.00)

Thus, proving there is no magical splitting particle. What this concludes is that observation has some 'sub-quantum' interaction that alters the sum of all paths, e.g. a non-local 'membrane' interaction [if you accept M-Theory]. Which means, quantum mechanics has also hit a threshold for its possible calculations of quantum entities since it has no means to 'normalize' the conception of sub-quantum interactions and/or entities. -- Bridget Armozel

 (5.00)

2 party system means that no side ever has to listen to the other side. All comments, true or false, can easily be brushed off as partisan. There is such a wider realm of stuff to get away with in a 2 party system than in a multi-party system. Although, honestly, having a bunch of people with something to gain tearing you down for something can't ever be all that effective, regardless of how many parties there are.

 (0.00)

Well, keep your eye on France, Germany, Spain and other European countries. Extremist muslims are getting stronger in those countries day by day. It is to the point where in France, when the extremist muslims march in protests, police force all dissenters away "for their own safety". There is no threat of Christians forcing their morality on you, they are stopping you from nothing. But there is a REAL threat of extremist muslims infecting the world with their virus of intolerance.

 (0.00)

For those who have left comments so far, you're all idiots. Why? 1) Of course I know it's Thesaurus.com. THAT'S WHY THE IMAGE ORIGIN SAYS THESAURUS.COM. 2) The irony is that Google (popular search engine) wasn't found SOMEWHERE and produced the phrase "We could not find google." 3) Huey Lewis and The News rock, so the music is fine. 4) There is no real #4, but you're all still retarded. Except for MaxJackste, who didn't even really comment on what the purpose was.

 (3.00)

Irony is a literary or rhetorical device in which there is a gap or incongruity between what a speaker or a writer says, and what is understood. More generally, irony is understood as an aesthetic valuation, which is variously applied to texts, speech, events and even fashion. All the different senses of irony, however, revolve around the notion of incongruity, or a gap, between our understanding or expectation and what actually happens.

 (5.00)

Its true but there is no way the crusades killed anywhere near 5 million people and i seriously doubt they ever killed one million and im including all the crusades, even the ones against heretics. good site though and take a gander at mine :D http://evilprophet.ytmnd.com/

 (1.00)

That's the problem with using audio from another source if it is already poor. If you do that, then add more stuff in, the audio gets worse. You could have found a source for the original speech and reconstrusted the studdering without all the horrible clipping. But if you don't want to admit that there is a problem with your audio sources and how it was mixed, that's okay. I was trying to help.