YTMND Search

 (5.00)

this one gets a 5 no more money in the future

 (5.00)

I was going to dock this a star for the lack of Chad Warden as suggested by the title, but the Murdar fartz made up for it

 (3.00)

I have met Billy West and did an interview with him its on the rainbow family podcast on youtube, myspace music archive.

 (0.00)

Just stop commenting on my sites, faggot. I thought you'd eventually get the picture, but somehow I need to spell it out for you. You made a site that implied that I was a sexual predator and another that implied I was sucking your dick in some pathetic furry fantasy. Yet somehow you're surprised that I continue to downvote your sites and expose you for the massive loser that you are. If you can't handle the embarrassment of being unpopular on a dead website, you need to seek professional help because at this point, it's just sad.

 (1.00)

Seriously dude, get the fuck over yourself.

 (5.00)

I feel like this is an allegory for something, and it's an addictive allegory

 (5.00)

I voted it up higher only to confuse the system.<br /><br />Nazi crap still sucks.

 (0.00)

It is 2025 and Picard song is on top. Batman in shambles

 (5.00)

Good but it would be preferable if sites with this character were labeled "FPS Doug" to distinguish him from the other Doug

 (0.00)

It's "you're" not "your."

 (4.00)

Yes, but it's *our* dead site

 (0.00)

guys i think its a trap

 (5.00)

this sites so good. I think i saw it on a ytmnd on ytmnd dot com on the internet on ytmnd a ytmnd it was on the ytmnd and it was a ytmnd

 (5.00)

I five'd it

 (5.00)

I havent seen it, is it good?

 (5.00)

i hope its solar powered

 (0.00)

SandalSmith? Hoo boy. His whole idea of content here are self-inserts. He seems to hold a vendetta against me because I've constantly talked smack about his YTMNDs. Now he downvotes mine every time they come up. I flew way, way off the handle and pulled a SqrlyJack (don't ask) to try and insult him. So basically it's a rivalry thing, because we're both too stubborn and butthurt at each other to quit. At least he barely uses YTMND, unlike Derpy.

 (1.00)

Well done. Now you get it.

 (5.00)

I don't want to know how long it took you to make this holy shit

 (5.00)

After getting ousted by Happy, Ronald decided to dial up the creepy to compete with The Burger King and thus, perhaps get his job back

 (0.00)

Crypto will be the future, buy XRP while it's still cheap. Trust me.

 (0.00)

he's been pretty dedicated to his privacy, aside from a few pictures with twitter users here and there, and I think after making those, what, 4 videos or so? He probably got tired of playing the character, or it ran it's course, but for all of us it never ran it's course. His character was a masterpiece in trolling and humor. I wish he'd embrace it more aside from his one quickly posted and deleted 4chan post.

 (5.00)

Thankful ytmnd was at its height in the stone age or I'd be out of a job.

 (0.00)

I mean . . . . It is a natural fit . . .

 (5.00)

As for people I have also downvoted on the regular? I can also offer my feelings there too.<br /><br />Pichuz / DerpySillyAccidentPR is definitely high on my list. Their sites come off as the mad ramblings of the mentally ill. The sites themselves are a bunch of text-to-speech leftist word salads, and the fact they're all handled as one big run-on sentence doesn't help. I also am not fond of the AI art they constantly spit out for their inane ramblings, either. Let alone they constantly delete their sites too, and spit out the same stuff constantly as well.<br /><br />SandalSmith? Hoo boy. His whole idea of content here are self-inserts. He seems to hold a vendetta against me because I've constantly talked smack about his YTMNDs. Now he downvotes mine every time they come up. I flew way, way off the handle and pulled a SqrlyJack (don't ask) to try and insult him. So basically it's a rivalry thing, because we're both too stubborn and butthurt at each other to quit. At least he barely uses YTMND, unlike Derpy.<br /><br />I will admit that there's definitely elitism going on. At least, I can admit to being guilty of it myself. Once again, I'm sorry for being a jerk, and want to do better going forward. If I felt anyone else was going to give you any insight or feedback, I wouldn't be going to all this effort to yap all of this on a dead proto-meme site. I don't always agree with you on stuff, Skanda, but I can appreciate when we do share similar interests and views.<br /><br />You're alright, dude.

 (5.00)

Well, this certainly got me to think when I saw it. Strap in, I guess I've got a word salad for you. Not trying to be mean with this one, but I'd like to offer my thoughts on your plight.<br /><br />By definition, I would say all your sites are classic YTMNDs. Picture, sound, text, and a singular focus. They don't use any of the classic fads / memes but honestly, they don't need to. For most of my own YTMNDs, I try to aim for some funny or unique concept, or a direct pop culture quote or scene. Not every site I've uploaded has been well-received either.<br /><br />If I had to guess about the downvotes? My best guess for others, as well as my personal feelings, are about overexposure. I'm again not trying to be mean, but I feel a lot of your YTMNDs are very samey. Usually they're about various female characters in media, or various e-girls, or they're political in nature. But it feels like you've got a "shotgun" approach, throwing a bunch of these very similar sites out at once constantly to see what sticks. <br /><br />I can't speak for everyone else here, but I can at least explain my own displeasure. It sadly doesn't help that people don't seem to offer any real feedback. It's something that irks me about comments across the internet in general. To be fair, a lot of my "constructive criticism" on YTMND is mostly snark and slurs that I qualify for myself.<br /><br />I know I've gotten annoyed by this approach plenty of times. I don't want to make a big deal about it. I'm kind of a zealot and get assmad over the stupidest things. I would like to try and be fair, and give higher ratings on sites of yours that I do like. And even for everyone else's YTMNDs? Hey, they can't all be winners. OfficialUnofficial is also guilty of having samey content.<br /><br />I can't really help you here, but I can at least express my own feelings. I'm sorry for being a jerk, and want to be more fair and supporting for your stuff here.

 (5.00)

It's not dead, it's resting!

 (0.00)

Not upset with a 3, more so of the comment, this website is based off of making crude and simple things, I wanted to make this because I was making something else, but stumbled upon this, and I liked the idea of it sounding like a record skipping. But that's about as far as the idea went. And so, I focused on that. Sometimes I like making things that are very basic one idea things. Not everything has to be high art or even middle art. So I totally get the 3, I just get flustered by people expecting more from me when sometimes I want to make something that requires no thought. Plus I've been working on a big reference site again, and so when I'm working on that, making something simple reminds me of why I'm making things in the first place, to have fun. Aaaaaaaanyways, I've rambled a bit. It's all good.

 (5.00)

this is such an amazing masterpiece, but its 2025 and not 2006 so practically nobody will see it

 (5.00)

Its one vote. Calm down.