Islam Lol Islam
Created on: February 14th, 2006
Sponsorships:
| user | amount | user | amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew386 | $19.12 | ||
| Sponsor this site! | Total: $19.12 | Active: $0.00 | |
Vote metrics:
| rating | total votes | favorites | comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| (3.63) | 252 | 42 | 167 |
View metrics:
| today | yesterday | this week | this month | all time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13,868 |
Inbound links:
| views | url |
|---|---|
| 29 | http://quraninit.ytmnsfw.com/ |
| 12 | http://www.google.fr/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=lol%20%20islam&source=web& |
| 10 | https://www.bing.com |
| 6 | http://vkontakte.ru/id138418069 |
| 5 | https://www.google.com/ |
obvious truths:
Belief in anything without substantial evidence can be dangerous
Both Christians and Muslims have been dangerous in the past, and still are
Muslims are decidedly more dangerous than Christians right now
The best tools to fight ignorance are science and secularism
Theocratizing America is a horrible, blatantly hypocritical idea
Sep of C&S is fundamental to the American experiment
some arab nations could benefit from secularism, but not by force.
sorry gr33n, I just think a tit for tat remark like that link is a bit out of the scope of the argument. One involves people, a large quantity of them, who are breaking several international laws in the name of radical religious fundamentalism. the other (your link) is a group lobbying (assumed) peacefully for something that is currently illegal and morally as wrong as the previously mentioned radical fundamentalists. Granted, they are both religious fundamentalists, but one's protests
, though disgraceful, are still very much legal, encouraged, and constitutional (their act of protesting). The other's involves taking (presumably) innocent lives, threats, and overall not-polite acts to further their goals, not moving within any legal system whatsoever. I feel your link was merely a distraction from the point, not a way of addressing it. Additionally, bringing up Woodrow Wilson, JFK, or any other president, is irrelevant. More superfluous, drawn-out arguments as events warrant. (dblpostsry
, though disgraceful, are still very much legal, encouraged, and constitutional (their act of protesting). The other's involves taking (presumably) innocent lives, threats, and overall not-polite acts to further their goals, not moving within any legal system whatsoever. I feel your link was merely a distraction from the point, not a way of addressing it. Additionally, bringing up Woodrow Wilson, JFK, or any other president, is irrelevant. More superfluous, drawn-out arguments as events warrant.
Bold
Italic
Underline
Code
User Link
Site Link