Oswald's safety wasn't guaranteed (refresh to sync)
Created on: February 14th, 2006
Oswald's safety wasn't guaranteed (refresh to sync)
Oswald didn't act alone, new conspiracy theory...

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(3.94) 106 0 19

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 1 0 0 5,638

Inbound links:

views url
3 http://www.marinetraffic.com
2 http://ytmnsfw.com/users/sakebalboa/

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
February 14th, 2006
(0)
excellent
February 14th, 2006
(0)
totally expected, but totally awesome. MAGIC BULLET!
February 14th, 2006
(0)
You would think it would, but this fad never gets old.
February 14th, 2006
(0)
kinda hard to see, if not expecting it, which i wasn't. maybe a red circle is needed? Still 5's though...
February 14th, 2006
(0)
I'm so confused...so is mullet man a good or bad guy?
February 14th, 2006
(0)
5'd, this is more than another tired fad thing. It actually FITS! Oswald was the one who went back in time with mullet man, he brought his own weapon and his safety was never guaranteed as he was shot by the portly guy.
February 14th, 2006
(0)
You have to admit, he does look like a killer.
February 14th, 2006
(0)
great!
February 14th, 2006
(0)
this fad is awesome
February 14th, 2006
(0)
Wow I didn't realise Lee Harvey Oswald was born in 1981!?! (Scarface was made in 1983 and Oswald was born in 1939 i really dont get it...)
February 14th, 2006
(0)
I didn't see the mullet man right away. Hooray for old fads!
February 14th, 2006
(0)
YOU F*CKING WIN
February 14th, 2006
(0)
good.
February 14th, 2006
(0)
Rawk : 2005 - 1981 = 24. 1963 - 1939 = 24. See the genious of this?
February 14th, 2006
(0)
I agree with aaaaaaaaa.... expected but awesome.
February 14th, 2006
(0)
before he shot jfk he read a book called catcher in the rye. several other asassins have claimed to had read the book before they decided to kill someone. catcher in the rye is required reading at my school lol.
February 14th, 2006
(0)
Safetybelievesit.ytmnd.com
February 14th, 2006
(0)
Sucks that Oswald didn't have anything to do with the assassination. He was just the "fall guy."
December 8th, 2013
(0)
:) > ;) > O