Stalin is the 1939 Man of the Year
Created on: March 5th, 2006
Stalin is the 1939 Man of the Year
Stalin is Time's 1939 Man of the Year...who do you think was 1938's?

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(3.95) 188 6 48

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 0 0 0 6,071

Inbound links:

views url
16 https://www.bing.com
5 http://www.google.com.hk
4 https://7ooo.ru/
3 http://7ooo.ru/forum/
3 https://www.google.com/

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
March 5th, 2006
(0)
LMAO. The music is what got me. any other music would have gotten you only a 3. Nice choice.
March 5th, 2006
(0)
For the record, Time's "Man of the Year" isn't given to the greatest man, but the man who influenced the events of that year the most. Osama Bin Laden was going to get the 2001 title, but people who didn't understand complained.
March 5th, 2006
(0)
yeah I know, but for the most part they only pick people who are considered "good"
March 5th, 2006
(0)
5'd for the music.
March 5th, 2006
(0)
win
March 5th, 2006
(0)
The music had me laughing.
March 5th, 2006
(0)
Hitler was the man of the year as well, in like 1930-something.
March 5th, 2006
(0)
This was before people knew about all of the atrocities he had committed in Russia
March 5th, 2006
(0)
March 5th, 2006
(0)
holy sh*t nice music.
March 5th, 2006
(0)
Actually, the Soviet national anthem also would've been good.
March 5th, 2006
(0)
Stalin rox your sox
March 5th, 2006
(0)
"Hitler was the man of the year as well, in like 1930-something." - read the description pls
March 5th, 2006
(0)
chuck norris is going to kill you with a roundhouse kick to the face, holycarplois
March 5th, 2006
(0)
Lol, check the quote at the bottom of the page.
March 5th, 2006
(0)
i didn't know stalin was disfigured
March 5th, 2006
(0)
He was nominated for turning a civil war turned USSR into an Industrial Super Power by costing the lives of a few million citizens.
March 5th, 2006
(0)
The music is PERFECT. That is why you get a 5.
March 5th, 2006
(0)
Ok, this is funny but stupid. This is from back when TIME magazine was gutsy and cool and was willing to give the "Man of the Year" award to someone who actually deserved it. Now they give it to Rudy Giuliani over Osama bin Laden just so they dont look ba
March 5th, 2006
(0)
*bad. If you want to make fun of something, make fun of one of the recent issues for MOTY.
March 5th, 2006
(0)
best music ever
March 5th, 2006
(0)
better stalin than bono
March 5th, 2006
(0)
"e was nominated for turning a civil war turned USSR into an Industrial Super Power by costing the lives of a few million citizens." more like 20 million. hitler ain'tgot sh*t on stalin.
March 5th, 2006
(0)
that means "most influential" idiot
March 5th, 2006
(0)
Man of the year just goes to whoever has CHANGED the world the most that year. It is not neccessarily a good thing. Osama Bin'Laden was up for one but TIMES realized that people wouldn't understand that they weren't supporting him and they'd flip out.
March 5th, 2006
(0)
Although they have in the past, Time doesn't like to give "Person of the Year" to 'evil' people anymore.
March 6th, 2006
(0)
20 million? lol. That must include war casualties.
April 6th, 2006
(0)
stalin wins
May 3rd, 2006
(0)
Krushchev > Stalin. Man, the people who leave these comments need to learn to read the other ones, damn.
(0)
OMG SECRET NAZI TIME!
June 5th, 2006
(0)
the balogna is in the nest, the pastrami is recyclable.
September 6th, 2006
(0)
He IS the best. He's a genius and if you don't agree with that, you're a dumbass.
October 1st, 2006
(0)
where would we be if stalin didn't have a hardon for killing germans? imagine if the millions of krauts that stalin killed had lived, and were unopposed. there's no goddamn way we'd have won ww2. the russkis won ww2. and yes, he was a tyrant that killed f*ckloads of his own people, but america has a long history of tyrant loving, especially those in oil rich nations
October 1st, 2006
(0)
Maybe if they would have spent less resources building bombs than baking bread they would have done better.
October 1st, 2006
(0)
sh*t we could have had hussain as a man of the year, back when he was at war with iran
October 1st, 2006
(0)
not so much a lack of bread as he deliberately starved the ukranians. interesting that it happened in '34, i wonder how many americans knew about it back then
October 1st, 2006
(0)
f*ck i mean, the man was brutal. but do americans give a f*ck about a guy who kills his own people? f*ck no. rwanda, cambodia, germany, turkey, sudan, we never even interrupted any of them.
October 1st, 2006
(0)
No Communist setup can ever meet the needs/wants of its people. Ever.
October 1st, 2006
(0)
see me saying a thing about communism?
October 1st, 2006
(0)
You have to realize that the Time 'Man of the Year" used to be given to world changers and not necessarily because of change for the better.
October 1st, 2006
(0)
yep
October 1st, 2006
(0)
wait i just f*cked my chronology all up. maybe its time for me to go to bed
October 1st, 2006
(0)
it be late
October 29th, 2006
(0)
FOR THE MOTHERLAND!!!
March 15th, 2007
(0)
Hitler was also the Man of the Year twice f I remember correctly.
March 16th, 2007
(0)
Im not gonna vote and tell you some reasons why ur site is bad.
March 16th, 2007
(0)
@cooke: It's always been the most influential. Time is not about giving awards to people, Time is a magazine about current events. They wanted to make Osama Bin Man of the Year, but were shouted down by Bush's worshippers. They were the only true journalists in a medium full of pandering self-congratulatory f*ggots.
July 13th, 2007
(0)
MOTY is about influence, not a value judgement. Hitler and Khomeni were also MOTY.