The Unfunny Truth about Calvin & Hobbes
Created on: April 24th, 2007
The Unfunny Truth about Calvin & Hobbes
Hope I don't destroy anyone's childhood memories TOO much.

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(2.2) 10 0 12

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 0 0 0 1,131

Inbound links:

views url
3 https://www.google.com/
1 https://www.google.co.uk/
1 https://www.google.hr/
1 https://www.google.ie/

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
April 24th, 2007
(0)
they aren't furries
April 24th, 2007
(0)
Really? The empirical evidence begs to differ: 1. Calvin is a human boy who carries a tiger plushie with him everywhere he goes. 2. Furthermore, Calvin often imagines this tiger as a sentient, humanoid being, and holds conversatins with him, plays with him, and even lets him sleep in his bed. 3. Calvin often imagines himself as a variety of animals, typically human-like versions of those animals that resemble him, including, among other things, a tiger, an owl, and an elephant. The defense rests.
April 24th, 2007
(0)
NOOO! YOU BITCH!
April 24th, 2007
(0)
I don't buy it.
April 24th, 2007
(0)
tha truth
April 24th, 2007
(0)
...You realize, in the strip, Calvin is SIX YEARS OLD, right?
April 24th, 2007
(0)
I'm entirely aware. Since when is furry neccessarily an adult subject? I'm not denigrating the strip, I'm just stating a fact: the strip exhibits many characteristics that are hallmarks of furry fandom. Please to not be having a cow, man.
April 24th, 2007
(1)
So, I guess you never had an imagination when you were six years old, huh?
April 24th, 2007
(0)
Yes, I did. Which is precisely my point. Furry is capable of being innocuous, it's capable of being about something other than sex. C&H contains anthropomorphic animals: therefore, it is furry. I don't see why you're getting worked up.
April 24th, 2007
(0)
Be that as it may, the thing is, Hobbes and Calvin's pretending he is being various animals is the product of his imagination, therefore a world unto itself. Furry suggests that Hobbes is a walking, communicating organism that exists in reality (such as Garfield or Snoopy), which Hobbes (argubaly) only exists in reality as an inanimate object. Therefore, even though you do argue with considerable evidence, I accept C&H as a comic strip about a boy with a fantastic imagination.
April 25th, 2007
(0)
I do suppose it's a matter of interpretation. Wow, reasoned discussion on YTMND, who'da thunk it?
April 24th, 2007
(0)
laem