Jeff Goldblum Is Terrible At Third Base
Created on: August 27th, 2009
Sponsorships:
| user | amount | user | amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| No one has sponsored this site ( ._.) | |||
| Sponsor this site! | Total: $0.00 | Active: $0.00 | |
Vote metrics:
| rating | total votes | favorites | comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| (4.06) | 35 | 6 | 22 |
View metrics:
| today | yesterday | this week | this month | all time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5,458 |
Inbound links:
| views | url |
|---|---|
| 51 | https://www.bing.com |
| 8 | http://us.mg3.mail.yahoo.com/dc/blank.html?bn=553&.intl=us&.lang=en-US |
| 7 | http://www.facebook.com/ |
| 6 | http://www.shacknews.com/chatty |
| 5 | http://twitter.com/ |
I guess that's where we're different, Cumion/Scumion/Domeonthekitchentable. I don't give 4's/5's to second rate material here. I don't settle for 2nd best and say, "It's a carbon copy of someones work, but it's funny. So 5." F*ck that sh*t. I'm looking for original work. Hell, put a fart noise over the audio in this and I'd bump it up to a 2. At least it would be adding SOMETHING to the edits.
"If they cite where they took it from it's not really stolen." Read that again...If they cite where THEY TOOK IT FROM..............it's not really STOLEN. The f*ck kind of logic is that? In the end, it looks like you're settling for second rate material. That's not the Umfuld/Stephens/Tile that I know. Deep down you want to 1 this. Everyone see's you 1 this type of sh*t all day. Don't be stubborn here. Swallow you're pride and hit the 1 star.
I'm not going to sit here and go my opinion your opinion my opinion your opinion my opinion your opinion my opinion your opinion my opinion your opinion my opinion your opinion my opinion your opinion because nothing will be settled in this one. You voted 4, I voted 1. Sports...or whatever the f*ck you think is funny. Great.
Bold
Italic
Underline
Code
User Link
Site Link