Windows 3.1 has failed.
Created on: September 29th, 2009
Windows 3.1 has failed.
This is real, and it usually loads DOS back, but it didn't! :O

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(1.5) 10 0 4

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 0 0 0 849

Inbound links:

views url
2 https://www.google.com/

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
September 29th, 2009
(0)
What the f*ck would possess you to use Windows 3.1? Are all those sh*tty AMV games and StickyBear Numbers really worth it?
September 29th, 2009
(0)
CHIPS CHALLENGE MOTHERF*CKER
September 29th, 2009
(0)
IT SI CONSPIRACY, THIS IS WHY I OLNEY USE MICRPSOFT BOB BECAUSE IT IS NO EFFECT NWO 911 STERILIZATION BARAK OBUMMER WATNS 2 KILL YOU GRADNMA
September 29th, 2009
(1)
You see, the 'dialog box' (that pretty colored box with the words inside), is telling the 'user' (that's you), that 'something' (a required component or library) is 'missing' (it's not there). You see, it's an informative UI element, much more user friendly than than a snapshot of the processor state.