?Arnold swallows everything |
fearcondom |
(4.62) |
27,196 |
2011-06-22 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Is it bad that %30 of the time I can tell who made a site based on the title alone and > %50 of the time by simply viewing the site?
|
? |
|
(0.00) |
0 |
UNKNOWN |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Vote based on the site, not the user
|
? |
|
(0.00) |
0 |
UNKNOWN |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
I read it because you replied to my comment and it showed up in my profile. This place probably is run by alts, way too many right now. I guess I would no longer be surprised to find out that newer users (09ers, 10ers, 11ers) are actually long-standing 06ers, 07ers, and even some 08ers. I mean, even you are a fairly new user, who has made decent sites since day one, something that is a bit out of the ordinary for someone without experience of YTMNDing. Or maybe you've been making nice edits since before you had a place to display them. It's hard to know anymore. <br /><br />There has apparently been a group of users out to get me (and very likely, a few others) for years, using multiple alts that they pass around to each other. I've always known that one account in particular has been used by more than one person, but have always attributed it to its creator and ring leader because accusing someone else would not be right. I have to ask myself "What the fuck did I do to make so many people mad? Make bad sites?" For anyone reading this, because I know there are people who follow me around 24/7, I'm sorry I tainted your enjoyment of a website by being present. <br /><br />I'm not saying that you, Lastimero, are part of that group in some way or some other user posting sites with a different account out of the fear of knowing that the sites would be downvoted on his real account for past douchebaggery, but I wouldn't be surprised to find out that you are, since it has been happening a lot lately. I'll just say for the record that you make great sites. So if you happen to be someone like He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named, who gloats about his "best sites", then fine. You've proven that I vote based on the user's negative activity. Not like it ever needed to be proven, since I've openly commented with my vote on his above-average recently created shit. <br /><br />And if you are
|
?Where Fads Go When They Die |
Lastimero |
(4.36) |
12,777 |
2011-06-12 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Thanks, man! It's from [site rooneytmnd:site]<br /><br />According to the sitemaker, GordonFremen, it is:<br />"Freedom Fighters (IO Interactive, EA, 2003) - 'Rebel Base,' composed by Jesper Kyd"
|
?First Step to a Real Blue Ball Machine |
TheFileClerk |
(4.00) |
4,681 |
2011-06-02 |
comment by:
rating given:
(4.00)
comment:
I'm voting well based solely on the well-devised and original gif. The concept doesn't really work for me, though, given the title. I don't see any juggling in the background, and the foreground's balls aren't blue.
|
?(nsfw) meet dan |
fourest |
(4.66) |
20,151 |
2011-05-15 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Gotta love all the fucking morons downvoting based on the user who created this site. Grow the fuck up.<br /><br />Cave Johnson, we're done here.
|
?RooneyTMND: The Top 10 Sites |
GordonFremen |
(4.22) |
2,353 |
2011-05-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Actually, if I were to award the Hivemind award, it would go to pubby8 for "The Battle of Britain". Thematically, he came the closest to what I had in mind.<br /><br />SPOILER: [spoil]My idea was to edit Rooney into the opening sequence of Saving Private Ryan, when the American forces are storming the beaches of Normandy. I was going to use the "Rebel Base" music and put a little helmet on him and have do the tumble after he gets shot. [/spoil]
|
?(nsfw) Nigga stole my bike 1970 |
robstevens |
(3.50) |
2,516 |
2011-05-11 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
fuck old fads, you should have used synced audio instead of being lazy, and, well fuck you for no reason.<br /><br />i'm 5ing this because youre probably an alt but hopefully a new user, or an old one who just made a new account and maybe you'll eventually contribute something other than "nigger jokes" that are just plain "nigger jokes" as opposed to "nigger jokes [i]about[/i] nigger jokes." which rarely happens here because this user base can laugh at the same shit over and over for years on end. kind of like a down syndrome person whos been hospitalized for head trauma who watches the last half of the Lion King every single fucking say and barely pay attention to the fucking screen, and who eats 50 fucking apple sauce cups a day. the;re not supposed to give him more than 2 or 3 in a day, but hey, if you worked in a hospital, wouldn't you give a fat retard in pain as many apple sauce cups as he wanted????
|
?All Your Base Funny Remix |
Dizzyzapper |
(1.00) |
1,231 |
2011-05-08 |
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
You couldn't find the bases.
|
?What happens when Alex Jones visits the UK ? |
oxygenfad |
(4.17) |
1,971 |
2011-05-04 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Naw, only he is like that. You can't disagree with Alex Jones. To be fare, if you've followed his career from the beginning you can tell he's only a "bull" because he's mimicking the big TV stations reporters. He used to complain that when he was asked on for interviews they "never let him get his points in" etc. His whole operation is based on mimicking the bigger TV stations production to try to reach the dominant audience.<br /><br />The sad thing about any sort of political discourse is that it's governed by laws of propositional logic which is really easy to over ride if you've studied it in school/books/where ever. Fighting over which flavor of ice cream is better can be won by the person well versed in these laws of logic. It's University level political philosophy type stuff, the general public doesn't understand, hell, "educated" don't even understand it.
|
?we all got trolled I guess |
prairiedogeric10 |
(2.80) |
1,989 |
2011-04-29 |
comment by:
rating given:
(3.00)
comment:
You seriously think I'm talking about one meaningless troll event on YTMND. I'm talking about the number off comments, the hours wasted, the infinite number of '-' and '+' just based solely on your profile. Hell, you've only been on here 7 or 8 months longer than I have and I come just about every day, and even then that's more than I should. And you pat yourself on the back over this? It's funny, yes, well played, yes. But insignificant to any part of real life, or even internet life for that matter. It's YTMND, the most pointless site on the web. But again: Redundant.
|
?Hollabackman - Crashman |
mik3m |
(4.42) |
12,946 |
2011-04-24 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
mik3m keeps his removed baby ovaries in a jar of formaldehyde. he uses dental floss to tie them around the base of his cock, pretending they are his 3rd and 4th testicles. he firmly cups them during his slumber party Skype conference calls with madDogSoldier, rodheh and his high school acapella group (who attempt to cover Boards of Canada songs). he has to give a needle poke to his real testicles every time madDogSoldier makes a joke about his butt. if he forgets to puncture his nuts, he has to punish himself on account of severe OCD and a general lack of mental health. he has to violently scratch at himself while flipping the lightswitch on and off exactly 100 times and if he messes [i]that[/i] up he has to carve yet another notch on his inner thigh and then slam his head against the corner of the stove.
|
?A Site to Appeal to Umfuld |
jimmm |
(4.00) |
2,164 |
2011-04-26 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
i have [i]never once[/i] "begged" you to vote 5. why would i ask a single person for a single vote? however, i have harassed you for downvoting my sites without viewing them. i know you did that because you tell me in emails, and you tell me you voted 2 based on my behavior and not the site content, a ytmnd voting trend you've spent years bitching about.<br /><br />it's kind of like how i have an in box full of your accusatory walls-of-text, telling me that i'm "ignoring my [your] site and voting 5 on the surrounding troll sites."
|
?Death and Turbotaxes |
Xerxes36 |
(4.38) |
17,014 |
2011-04-18 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
What you did not respond to was how your (Rand's) philosophy accounts for, what dooshy and stoned way did i put it?, oh yeah - "systemic disparities among groups?" <br /><br />For example, women have historically (meaning "over the course of time") been subject to a certain amount of bias (meaning "less pay"). How does your rugged individualism account for this phenomenon? I've been assuming that the only way one can really believe that the glass ceiling is justified is if they believed woman were essentially lesser beings. That's what we typically deride as [i]essentialism[/i]. But maybe I'm off-base here. Maybe you've found another reason? Same goes for any other other you can name.<br /><br />As for the semantics, okay then, not socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor then. Howzabout cooperation for the rich and competition for the poor?
|
|
?Sippin' that Haterade |
yourdogisnowtheman |
(3.98) |
5,190 |
2011-04-07 |
comment by:
rating given:
(2.00)
comment:
the Uncircumcised account was created 5 days before the jlabel account. both of these accounts are the only people who have accused me of being an "art fag" based on next to nothing. i know i've been called that before, but only by ytmnd randoms who were commenting on one of the few cool gif with ambient music sites i've ever made. it just seems like you're failing at using multiple accounts to appear to two different half wit trolls.
|
? |
|
(0.00) |
0 |
UNKNOWN |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
There is really nothing to say about this one, it explains itself. Can I ask you something? how did you achieve the video effect? Maybe you used a program that assigns a specific color based on volume and timbre. I really really like it!
|
Duet in Stereo #1 |
max |
|
0 |
2011-03-18 |
comment by:
comment:
YTMND user base may be shrinking but the remain users are getting more and more intense.
|
?I like to play with the bubs |
yourdogisnowtheman |
(3.57) |
2,099 |
2011-03-14 |
comment by:
rating given:
(4.00)
comment:
even if a voice site is kinda lame, at least (roughly) one half of it is original content. or something. people here don't like original content very much. they say "go back to youtube faggot" or something of that sort. or people like darthwang vote one and call it "generic."<br /><br />they comment/vote/update their enemies lists/create content based on their own understanding of "original content," which consists of 99% [i]stolen[/i] content and 1% of a [i]bad joke[/i] added to it.<br /><br />[i]sorry guys, there obviously no discussion needed here, which is the saddest part of all[/i]
|
?Picard answers for YTMNDs crimes |
mcroix |
(4.61) |
17,288 |
2011-04-04 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
one of the main problems is the "fad mentality," that is, perpetuating easily identifiable trends based on a small amount of assets and one reference. i have made very few "fad" sites, but when i did, i made it a point to [i]NOT[/i] include the majority of expected fad assets, and to add something to the experience that reached beyond the fad expectation, even if the end result was totally inane. what you got was at least something different, and from that any number of "fad" tangents could have branched off (which i guess would have defeated my intent) and/or new ideas could have been realized, in the same/similar context, from what i created. but of course that never happened (not that i hail my own work as meme-generating genius) and what i got in return was "needs more tiny onions" or "i wanted to hear turkey" or "-1 for no pillowy mounds." see what i'm getting at?<br /><br />given whatever context, an audience will expect what they will expect. that doesn't mean the people who create the context need to limit themselves to what they believe the audience will expect. does that make sense? i'm not even asking much at all. i'm suggesting that ytmnd users [i]attempt[/i] to think outside the ytmnd expectation and create content at risk of having it be not readily understood - or worse - downvoted based on practically nothing.
|
?Picard answers for YTMNDs crimes |
mcroix |
(4.61) |
17,288 |
2011-04-04 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
I think the site hungers for new fads, but with such a reduced user base it's like a big comedy gold mine with only a skeleton crew of miners... yet users seem to glom onto anything that hits critical mass these days ... TNG is a pretty comfortable armchair.
|
?Picard answers for YTMNDs crimes |
mcroix |
(4.61) |
17,288 |
2011-04-04 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
here's a sad story. i was talking my my friend about ytmnd. by the way, this person is the guy who showed me ytmnd for the first time. anyway, i was telling him about how dead it is and how there is now a very small user base. he replied "that's awesome!" to which i was perplexed. i asked him why he thought that was so great, and he explained "well, if there's such a small circle of people making content, then there should be a lot less dumb fad crap and much more fine tuned, quality content. i mean, doesn't a small circle of users make for some sick collaborations? i'm excited to see where that goes. besides, max probably likes it better that way." i told him he was mistaken, he should not be excited for ytmnd's future and yes, max probably does like it better that way.<br /><br />this is a great site and all, but why are we continuing to make star trek shit and sites about ytmnd?
|
?Advice Max Speaks |
eightbitprodigy |
(3.55) |
2,818 |
2010-06-03 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
there is a large chunk of this user base?
|
?Advice Max Speaks |
eightbitprodigy |
(3.55) |
2,818 |
2010-06-03 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
this is the highest rating i have ever given this "ADVICE" bullshit, let alone an ADVICE site that is so inside to ytmnd that a large chunk of the site's user base wouldn't even understand it.
|
?Guess Who's Back for Phantasy Star Unive... |
enemy33 |
(3.14) |
4,140 |
2006-04-28 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Rappies!<br /><br />hard to find but worth it (especially their seasonal variants. Rappy Amure, Rappy Paska, Rappy Latan, and Rappy Noel)<br /><br />also of note Jaggos (based on the Chao from Sonic) also appear as rare spawns and they too have seasonal variants (Jaggo Amure, Jaggo Sonichi, and Jaggo Acte)<br /><br />also Rappies are common in certain missions (Hill of spores, Dancing Birds, Forest map (Mag and Mag2), Flowery Pursuit, etc..) as Rappy Polec.<br /><br />And also of note Rappy Gugg (based on the Rappy King from the older Phantasy Star games) and the rare Rappy Igg (which is a pink variant of Rappy Gugg that appears in Dancing Birds and Flowery Pursuit)
|
?LOS: requiem |
venkatesh |
(3.31) |
2,081 |
2011-03-29 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Children children please you must realize that only 1% of the user base here are actual legit accounts the other 99% of the user base are their minions for downvoting and upvoting and other various shenanigans they deem fit to get up to. Such is the life here and has been that way from the very beginning. I wouldn't worry about it personally it'll only drive you to the dark side in the end.
|
Feeling Good |
max |
|
0 |
2011-03-11 |
comment by:
comment:
Max,<br /><br />You repeatedly ignore the concept of informing your user base of goings on with the site. A user base that is the sole source of content for your site.<br /><br />Hardware failures happen. Only gross negligence can lead to backups failing as well. But I digress...<br /><br />You have missed yet another opportunity in this latest post to correct/clarify/inform your user base regarding your previous post. You know, the one from Nov.05, 2010?...the one where you mentioned actual improvements to the site as well as additional accountability for it's users in the from of additional mods and "moderating with an iron fist"...<br /><br />I would like to hit you.
|
?Janis Joplin: LOLOLOLOLOLOL |
anystrom |
(3.86) |
13,263 |
2011-03-12 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Why would you lower your rating based on the weather?
|
Feeling Good |
max |
|
0 |
2011-03-11 |
comment by:
comment:
Max, I thought you were going to keep the Minecraft server up, but from what you said I will lose the opportunity to meet people there, people who even use this website. For example, yesterday I was very excited when I found out that a YTMND user was in the world. I wanted to talk to him and play with him a little bit. I'm new at Minecraft so everything about it looks new and beautiful, especially the fact that I can interact with real people. Of course, there's always the real world but it's my choice if I want to go and play in a virtual world. Besides, I'm most probably the only Italian active user here and I bet most of you live in the States, in any case far from that shithole that is Italy, and I wanted to see what is like to play with one of you, without having my words dismissed in an indistinguishable cloud of forced unfunny jokes and pitiful self promotion. I think it's acceptable here to have this behaviour, we can all be characters here. But in Minecraft, how much does a fake and shady "personality" last? In the 3D world you are more human than in a webpage.<br />The impending closure of that Minecraft server will make me reflect about the importance of the real world not based on a computer. There's no switch off for the Universe.
|
?Charlie gets help |
Harbltron |
(4.00) |
2,765 |
2011-03-03 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Charlie doesn't have a drug problem or an alcohol problem, his thetans are just acting up. I'm pretty sure once they get charlie up to gold base 3 or 4 heavy duty audits and a psychic exorcism session later, he'll be boning hookers responsibly again, hell he might even become respectable.
|
? |
|
(0.00) |
0 |
UNKNOWN |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
If you read the entire new testament from cover to cover, and take no other christian writings into consideration, you would have to assume Jesus "was" in favor of a Social Meritocracy, based on his allusion of heaven. however, there is really no way you can fit him into any modern political affiliation with any certainty. If somebody asked Jesus this question, he's probably just get pissed and give you his answer in the form of a parable.
|