? |
|
(0.00) |
0 |
UNKNOWN |
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
max saved ytmnd all by himself by not letting anyone delete their account lol
|
? |
|
(0.00) |
0 |
UNKNOWN |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Better tell max about that! He's sure to delete them within the next couple of days!
|
?BATMAN 25 of 100 |
BatmanYTMND |
(4.08) |
7,697 |
2012-07-07 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Not unless max does a lot of banning / deleting, no.<br /><br />Also, this site seems to be unsyncable now. Used to sync. Just way off now. Tried to fix - pointless.
|
?old simpson joke |
LegoLewdite |
(4.35) |
9,371 |
2012-07-25 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
You are one of the most creative ytmnd user's on this website, I don't know why you and the other top 20 or so user's try to petition Max to fix this website, fix it by deleting down voters and preventing them from ever returning because it is people like them that have ruined this entire website. Moonman is an abomination that was once a funny fad but now is pure garbage. People like Santa Bot AI, Farkle, WannabeGayNigger, and all of the alternate art accounts should be banned. I believe a simple solution could could be put in place such as one account per email address and IP address. Also fix the upload system where you can only upload so much depending on the ratings of your ytmnd's, so if you keep uploading crap you get a temporary ban, following a permanent ban, perhaps a 3 strikes system, or maybe a ban do moderators discretion. We also need to fix the abuse of the down voting system, it has driven away many ytmnd users and starts down voting wars if someone doesn't like someone or doesn't like their site, which in return creates a hostile environment that is poisoning the core of this site. Doing all of these things would hopefully bring back talent that left ytmnd because of the lack of decay due to poor moderation of this website, and hopefully give it a chance to grow again.
|
?Requiem for a Phil |
Incentive |
(4.13) |
9,716 |
2012-07-02 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Heh, well while I've never challenged your pre-2011 sites' popularity (especially that great DeNiro site), the popularity isn't quite my point.<br /><br />See, my problem is just with the equation of site quality = default respect for user. This is the trait that has made you as an individual unpopular amongst many users and this is what has stirred up controversy.<br /><br />And I didn't vote on this site at all. I can't do anything on any alts. Max put them in the deletion queue...I'm pretty sure I already mentioned that. As far as I know the only person who voted twice was DaveTheRave with his HighDefinition account and I had not at all requested that, in fact I would have preferred greatly he had not done so as to not give off an appearance of artificial voting. <br /><br />Anyways, you going to answer the actual question or not? It's really simple.
|
?Requiem for a Phil |
Incentive |
(4.13) |
9,716 |
2012-07-02 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Well, it's been all day and he hasn't posted a comment with his 1, so I'll go ahead and just leave the comment for him anyways.<br /><br />Umfuld, I'd like to mention how you criticized me for not being able to make a site that gets a high rating. Well, using accounts to display blatant troll behavior causing max to add my alts to the deletion queue ensuring I could not use them to upvote anything at all and it seems helped in getting him active (although I think was mostly farkle that did that) like intended. Then I created this site, which has been on up and coming all day and has maintained a good rating without me using a single alt or telling anyone to "vote five".<br /><br />But more importantly, I'd like to mention how at the beginning of 2011, if you remember, I came online and sent you among others messages stating my desire to set aside the whole "troll wars" thing for the better of YTMND.<br /><br />You ignored it. <br /><br />So now I'll propose the message again: maybe ease off a bit bud, calm down and try to enjoy YTMND again? People wouldn't cheat on you if you weren't so uptight all the time. If you want to stop all this nonsense, I'll stop all this nonsense as well.
|
?The Day of Reckoning |
Harbltron |
(3.74) |
5,577 |
2012-06-27 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Umfuld's claim of dominance <br /><br />+<br /><br />1:40 in this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOc4XgBespw<br /><br />=<br /><br />2 people that WERE and are NO LONGER<br /><br />[spoil]because there's currently nothing to show for the featured sites that were deleted (because Umfuld was pouting after max comment-banned him), making it pretty ironic that Umfuld called Harbltron the moron[/spoil]
|
?(nsfw) Moon Man Email: Woodworms |
FowderSoapReturns |
(3.08) |
1,964 |
2012-05-30 |
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
I thought max was going to finally start deleting all these.
|
?The Moon Man Nebula |
FowderSoapReturns |
(3.38) |
1,639 |
2012-05-17 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
its not but max said recently anything related to moon man will be mass deleted
|
? |
|
(0.00) |
0 |
UNKNOWN |
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
something is fishy here. GenerationMoon was just created 11 hours ago. when did Max say he was planning to delete all Moon sites? all of GenerationMoon's sites are stereotypical moon sites.
|
Her Majesty |
max |
|
0 |
2012-04-23 |
comment by:
comment:
You need to extend the length of reply chains. I was not finished and must now continue my writings in this comment which is unchained to my previous ones.<br /><br />Anyway, let us return to the point of my first post on this news update. Everyone should stop worrying about YTMND's current state and just make some quality sites. I have no idea how you could possibly discern from my post that deleting sites and users was a good idea, as the point of my first post expressed exactly the opposite view. We are very different people, me and you max. You are a jew, I am superior being, you like getting drunk and counting silver shekels, and I like to make websites better with awesome Moon man materials. But, at the end of the day, we are similar in a very important way. We both share an intense affection for this website. We both share an interest in keeping this website's quality high, and we can both become rather upset when we glance upon the lower-quality parts of it. In this emotional state, we both can make some foolish decisions. These decisions have far reaching consequences for those around us. Like it or not, bad quality and good quality exist, and must forever exist, in a yin and yang like state on this website. There is nothing we can do to change it. <br /><br />I'm not going to go in depth on why Moon man and his Moon Crew are not bad entities, and how they are not hurting this website. I already discussed that in a private message with you. The Moon Crew YTMND users are simply another part of YTMND, just as you are max. You created YTMND, but you can not control every facet of it, and even if you could, you should not. Your attempts to totally control YTMND and its types of content will ultimately harm YTMND. If YTMND is hurt because of reckless actions -- such as deleting other parts of YTMND -- based on inaccurate assumptions, then you will suffer just as much as we will, because we are both parts of this website.
|
Her Majesty |
max |
|
0 |
2012-04-23 |
comment by:
comment:
5. Make it easier for these new accounts to SHARE YTMNDS WITH THE REST OF THE INTERNET. Post to Twitter, Facebook, reddit, whatever. Create something that monitors the value these users add to your site: how much traffic they're pulling in with their recommendations, how much hustle they put into promoting OTHER PEOPLE'S work. Let that good work be part of the "fast-track" algorithm to voting privileges.<br /><br />I honestly don't think this can be all self-regulated; I think YTMND needs to get some good moderators. max, you obviously don't have the time to make YTMND your top development priority, so I think the best move here is to set up some new moderators that can be trusted to be fair and impartial.<br /><br />This is not about narrowing the range of "acceptable sites" or saying that faggy art films are better than no-effort sites. I love all kinds of sites: noise sites, art sites, faggy short films, DEWs, fads, fad comps, classic sites - the style doesn't matter. What matters is intent. It's obvious when someone's intent is just to piss off another user, troll the community, or just generally act like a tit. I humbly submit that it wouldn't be too hard get a few guys to volunteer to delete some accounts for you.<br /><br />Trolls and thoughtful discussion below, please.
|
?max & ytmnd |
YourTheCoconutMan |
(4.37) |
8,332 |
2012-04-28 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Max, if you really believe in the dream you would give this site some sort of moderation. Umfuld's said it a million times and he's right. There are too many cancerous parasites on this site and its gone from thriving, to being comatose and on life support.Users like farkle, santabotai, pilleater, joshcube, johnnylurg and their combined 10.000 alt accounts are what destroyed this place. No one wants to put any effort into creating any content when there are about 10 circle jerking faggots downvoting anything of value and upvoting moonman, santabot, mr.krabs, and party mouse sites. No one wants to view anything because anything of vaule is quickly banished into oblivion and everything on up and coming is vote hacked trash.<br /><br />I understand why you've hesitated so long on moderation but if you really want to resurrect this site then it is the only way. Complete freedom of expression is one of the things that made this place great a long time ago but in the end it appears to be the same thing that's killed it. You have to get some mods and there are still a few quality users here who I'm sure would do it. You could assign mod tiers and promote people when they moderate responsibly and revoke their mod status if they start banning user accounts based personal grudges. You could make it so accounts can't be permanently deleted unless the mods vote on it. Hell you could even be lazy and just have a group of users of your choice get together in chat at a designated time and vote out cancerous user accounts and send the results of the vote to you if you are too lazy to fuck around with the code for a mod system.<br /><br />So do you really care at all about this place max? It made you a pseudo celebrity once. Now it's good for buying you a bottle of grey goose every other week. So will you do something to fix it? Or will you give us another news update in 9 months briefly informing us of a con you will be attending. <br /><br />Also, I'm back bitches.
|
?A Message for BobHughes |
pharaohmobius |
(3.43) |
1,263 |
2012-04-30 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
bobhughes got grabbed by some jackass when max was deleting shit... That's the truth.
|
|
?alts |
MySpace |
(3.45) |
1,606 |
2012-04-19 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
I reported you to Max too, he said that he hates you and would like to delete you but without you people wouldn't make funny batman sites
|
? |
|
(0.00) |
0 |
UNKNOWN |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
I miss FutureFaggyFeaturedUser. He made the best sites. Max was wrong to delete him.
|
?Why you should downvote Moon Man sites |
mik3m |
(3.86) |
3,614 |
2012-03-04 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Anon0830: i had such fun with that album last year<br />SantabotAI: im fucking worried<br />Anon0830: i know will not make u worriesd<br />Anon0830: listen to<br />Anon0830: apop berzerk - harmonizer<br />Anon0830: that<br />Anon0830: album<br />Anon0830: ruled<br />Anon0830: srsly<br />Anon0830: omg<br />SantabotAI: i did the bad ass thing today<br />Anon0830: wut<br />SantabotAI: i went on the school computer and deleted everything<br />Anon0830: i know ur theme<br />SantabotAI: evetything for work<br />SantabotAI: now all grades, records<br />SantabotAI: are gone<br />SantabotAI: no back up<br />Anon0830: apop - rollergirl<br />Anon0830: they have the grades<br />SantabotAI: im so badasss<br />SantabotAI: nope<br />Anon0830: u cant bat them<br />SantabotAI: a small school with 60 kids<br />SantabotAI: hell no<br />SantabotAI: i almost got caught<br />Anon0830: u will never win<br />SantabotAI: hold on let me listen<br />Anon0830: u will lose<br />Anon0830: apop - rollergirl<br />Anon0830: make a santabot site with that song<br />SantabotAI: it was so secret, i lied to my boyfriend it wasnt me<br />SantabotAI: k<br />Anon0830: i rmbr that song on the radio<br />SantabotAI: im listening kkk<br />Anon0830: here i will make u listen<br />SantabotAI: im listening<br />SantabotAI: kkk is this it<br />Anon0830: yea<br />Anon0830: u beat me<br />SantabotAI: it sounds weird<br />Anon0830: that song rules<br />SantabotAI: lol, faster internet<br />Anon0830: it came on the radio three times i rmbr back then<br />SantabotAI: lol they want to get us banned for that stuff i wrote about hacking max's accoutn on the moon kkkkrew<br />Anon0830: u banned<br />Anon0830: not me<br />SantabotAI: http://moonkkkrew.forumotion.net/t505-hack-max-s-account<br />SantabotAI: but were bf and gf<br />Anon0830: well<br />Anon0830: u banned<br />Anon0830: not meSantabotAI: its like u want me to gety bannedSantabotAI: im not banned yetSantabotAI: i probably wont be
|
?hey guys |
YourTheCoconutMan |
(3.64) |
3,088 |
2012-03-04 |
comment by:
rating given:
(2.00)
comment:
i swear to GOD i deleted the "]" before the "MY" (i'm talking about the part that looks like "]MY")<br />what a ripoff.<br /><br />can you believe we pay money for this shit? i always say that i'll say something to max but have i ever? fuck, i'll shut up now..
|
?Excuse Me While I Whip This Out. |
heatherkfeather |
(3.60) |
462 |
2012-01-24 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
5d for the nostalgia reminding me of the first site I made on ytmnd (which I deleted when max asked people to delete content way back when)
|
?SUN |
GordonFremen |
(4.23) |
9,846 |
2011-10-09 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
I thought max deleted all your alts.
|
? |
|
(0.00) |
0 |
UNKNOWN |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
I remember seeing a site a few years ago with the same image/sound with the premise of Max doing something. I think it got deleted, though. Welcome back.
|
?Umfuld comments on your YTMND site. |
MellowYellow |
(3.53) |
1,817 |
2011-10-01 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Hi friends. I'm rytanmontana and I'd like to invite you to view some of my sexy YTMND websites: [user ryanmontana:sites]<br /><br /><br />Today I'm featuring a site I made this week featuring [b][u]NICE EDITS[/u][/b]: [site iwasntsurehowtospellingredientssoihadtogoogleithaharustybrain:site]<br />Although fairly lowbrow I often go back to this one myself just to see the ingredients for a dope. I had made some other "Funny preview images" but they were deleted by Max because some troll asked him to. Fart.
|
Strobe |
max |
|
0 |
2011-09-08 |
comment by:
comment:
Now, just for fun, I'd like to see Umfuld reveal the alts that these users have cheated with. I'm aware that some of these guys have used alts in the past, but some of those names are new to me. Tell me the alts used by Harbltron, eightbitprodigy, FatHistorian, Cliffington88, PoHandle, Locke5, and TheeBatman TO CHEAT. <br /><br />I don't condone any of the alt abuse that some of these others may have done in the past. They learned their lesson when some of their accounts were deleted and they never did it again. You had your core group of alts in 2008 that were later deleted after you were comment-banned. I don't know how much abuse you did with them, but Cumion and Scumion must have been locked and deleted for a reason. You came back and made a whole new army, doing the same thing -- using each and every one of them to vote. Then you just made it obvious by logging into every account to downvote my sites and anyone who openly called you out while shouting to max "I don't care anymore, I'm going to alt-bomb anyone who mentions me in a comment!" So yeah, there's a reason I have fun criticizing you for that shit. You were always playing the imaginary role of YTMND Police, altering your vote so the site receives the overall vote you think it deserves, calling people out for using alts, etc. Yet you turn around and do the same fucking thing. It's like a cop busting some dude for drugs, confiscating it, and turning around to smoke it himself. <br /><br />This is typical Umfuld too, complaining about the things I like. Right now, if I were to go to these users' profiles and 5 at least one of each of their sites, Umfuld would be right behind me to vote 1, with the reason being that my vote "wasn't real." <br /><br />If you want to complain about circle jerking, bitch about every single person who ever voted 5 on a site containing the symbol "#?!"
|
Strobe |
max |
|
0 |
2011-09-08 |
comment by:
comment:
i will pay $25 sponsorship to a site to save the gr33nscr33n account from the abyss of deletion. which in turn max can give it to kiva to loan the money to some Cambodian woman to buy vegetables for her micro business.
|
?(nsfw) Toby Keith loves his bar |
prairiedogeric10 |
(3.55) |
3,025 |
2011-08-31 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA you can't stay away!! Still clinging onto that tall tale about you putting your own account into deletion? If you really did, you wouldn't be here now, would you? Pretty sad considering your only activity on this pathetic account consists of "getting" me and telling max he sucks (for banning you).
|
?abafnsaga |
LegoLewdite |
(3.64) |
3,478 |
2011-08-29 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
"but then Max deleted one of my high rated profiles I wasn't cheating with"<br /><br />http://ytmnd.com/sites/962514/profile/c6076294
|
?abafnsaga |
LegoLewdite |
(3.64) |
3,478 |
2011-08-29 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
No, you didn't downvote just the troll sites about you. You went through old sites of mine, jimmm's, and several other people and downvoted them, even though they were never going to see the front page ever again anyway. My top site had over 520 votes back in December (or whenever that was) and now it's at 488. The 32+ votes that have since been deleted came from you and gr33nscr33n. Any new site I posted at the time (whether it happened to reference you or not) got hammered. I also laughed when you claimed that you deleted every vote from your alts and put them into deletion. That might have been true for your Stop-Trolling bullshit, but not the case for all of your old ones. You expect me to believe that you put Nothingman into the queue? Come on, the account on which you received max's only 5 in 2009 (or whatever that was)? I bet you had that printed out and taped on your fridge for your 0 visitors to see. I haven't forgotten about the cover-up that you did on every account either (the NeoMatrixClt thing, which is also cheating because you voted on his sites multiple times). <br /><br />Your accounts were not all deleted by you. You can keep telling yourself that they were, but it won't change the fact.
|
?BaconnaiseTMND |
baconnaise |
(3.33) |
1,708 |
2011-08-10 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Get ready to grab [site baconnaise:site] as soon as max runs the deletion queue
|
Boom Boom |
max |
|
0 |
2011-07-16 |
comment by:
comment:
So is there just no way to keep johnnylurg out of here for good? Is he getting around his ban using proxies or something? Or is he using different computers. Either way max you seriously need to get on getting some new mods. Make me a mod and I'll delete that idiot's accounts within 5 minutes of him posting his spam.
|
?What do you think, Linda? |
prairiedogeric10 |
(3.94) |
3,290 |
2011-07-20 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
Max deleted a bunch of sites before launching 2.1. I typed in a bunch of random domains until the green "available" showed up and I just jumped on them right away. There's one other that I found but haven't thought of a good site to make for it yet.
|