YTMND Search

 (0.00)

"Some conspiracy enthusiasts think that our modern technology is the product of alien technology"<br />Putting words in people's mouths. Fabulous, fabulous.<br /><br />"It is only to the dim of wits that these developments seem like inexplicable mysteries."<br />How ironic...<br /><br />"I suppose there is always an element of the unknown in the world--and who knows, perhaps the least likely explanation could prove the right one after all. But only fools would invest much faith in such improbabilities."<br />"When you rule out the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, is the truth."<br />-- Sherlock Holmes

 (5.00)

There's this new cartoon on PBS called Daniel Tiger's neighborhood. It makes all the world of make believe characters come to life in cartoon form.<br /><br />They use all of Mr Roger's songs, characters, sayings and whatnot, but all homogenized. Like Lady Elaine is just some regular woman instead of a crazy scary psychopathic puppet and King Friday, Prince Tuesday and the owl have zero personality. The Daniel tiger puppet was always shy and coy, but this new one is all outgoing and acts like Syd the Science kid.<br /><br />They never ever mention Mr. Rogers in any way.<br /><br />I think it's a huge betrayal to him and it pisses me off.

 (3.00)

""a Muslim will say he FEELS you are a heathen who needs to follow Allah or get his head chopped off."<br />Doesn't that tell you that he is not of God?"<br /><br />How do I know that this 'God' of yours exists? So far, I don't even have any evidence. I know that both muslim people and christian people assert that there is a god, but both groups make different claims about the god they claim to exist.<br /><br />But that is all have as proof. Just claims.

 (3.00)

"I suppose his political views are liberal socialism favoring One World Government"<br /><br />The first part, probably. The 'favoring One World Government' is probably only favored by the most powerful and corrupt members of the establishment.<br /><br />"how is he a descent guy, if all he post post are these ear rape sites "<br /><br />pretty ironic and hypocritical, considering how much you like and make moon man sites. Just admit that you are both a couple of prankster trolls that want to get others going and get off your high horse.<br /><br />"i'd also like to throw in that he is a porn addict. "<br /><br />how would you know and so what? unless we are talking about child porn, there is nothing wrong with it, contrary to what demented religious old farts say<br /><br />"overall he is a monumental loser."<br /><br />He works in the music industry and is going for his Master's Degree. He is also self supporting and is a performing musician. I personally filmed one of his performances. How about yourself?

 (5.00)

To be honest I think the 1-to-5 system is stupid. People want to give their own vote as much weight as possible, so the logical thing to do is "split voting" with 1's and 5's. Youtube, Reddit, and other popular sites realized this so they went from numerical ratings to binary vote +/- systems.<br /><br />Of course, max doesn't exactly stay ahead of the curve. In fact, the downfall of YTMND can be attributed to max failing to stay ahead of the curve.<br /><br />Back in early 2005, max could have realized that the advent of home broadband meant his dialup-friendly gif/mp3 host was about to be left in the dust. People were ready for a full-motion video host, and during that crucial moment, YTMND was the frontrunner for multimedia hosting. If you think about it, YTMND had already gotten over the biggest hill - people knew about it.<br /><br />The time was right to upgrade. The phrase "Buy low; sell high" couldn't have applied more. The dot-com crash of the early 00's was like the video game crash of '83...the demand wasn't gone, but skittish short-sighted investors thought it was just a bubble that had popped until Nintendo swooped in '85 and took an unsuspecting market by storm. It was the exact same situation in '05: everyone thought the dot-com market had crashed, but casual internet users had more bandwidth than ever before, and they wanted a simple web-based video hosting service instead of dicey file-sharing networks. <br /><br />YTMND would have been perfect, the recognition was there, max had arguably the biggest corner on the web multimedia market, his traffic was soaring and hardware prices were at an all time low. The opportunity was there; max sat on his rear end because of some pretentious artsy-fartsy desire to cling to the format of Image, Sound, Text. In 2006, then-little-known website "Youtube" sold for $1.6 billion.<br /><br />A lot of us look back at opportunities we missed and laugh...max, do you cry?

 (1.00)

I think it's encouraging them, honestly, but it's also part of the larger problem: that we're still here at all. I mean, the best thing to dry up and blow this site away would be if everyone who isn't a "faggot" would just quit forever. Imagine how exciting it'd be for woman, DarthWang, farkle, moonmanfan, pilleater, and whatever acc't santabot is using these days to simply post for each other all day long. You can be sure they'd keep doing it, no doubt. Ten years from now, the bunch of them tards would still be at it. But if a faggot posts a site on the internet and there's nobody around to care...

 (4.00)

HL2 ALYX NUDE (real)<br />Angry Sun Attacks!<br />lol miggan bowls<br />Domo!<br />When you see it you'll sh*t bricks<br />Fun With Windows 8!<br />Created on: 6 minutes ago<br /><br />Fun With Windows 8!<br />• Report this site<br />Created By:lacrossestar83 <br />Domain:sill.ytmnd.com<br />Description:my 999th site<br />Background Origin:a monitor<br />Foreground Origin:Windows 8<br />Sound Origin:Sound Blaster 16<br />Keywords:<br />None ( ._.)<br />Your Rating:Voted: 4 stars <br />Sponsorships:<br /><br />User Amount User Amount<br />No one has sponsored this site ( ._.)<br />Sponsor this site! Total: $0.00 Active: $0.00<br />Vote metrics:<br /><br />Rating Total Votes Favorites Comments<br />Score: 4.6667 stars(4.67) 3 0 0<br />View metrics:<br /><br />Today Yesterday This Week This Month All Time<br />0 0 0 0 0<br />Inbound links:<br /><br />Views Url<br />No one has linked to this site. ( ._.)<br />Add a comment<br />Richtext is ON<br />Bold<br />Italic<br />Underline<br />Code<br />User Link<br />Site Link<br /><br />SUBMIT0 of 2000 characters used.<br /><br />There are no comments, why don't you make the first?

 (1.00)

you know what is so sad lax-boy? whenever i'm on ytmnd I have to make sure my volume is turned down below 10/100. I don't do that anywhere else, because I don't need too.<br /><br /><br />So why do I do this? Because of you. You think you're sooooooooo funny, clever, and witty with your repetitive ear rape bullshit. <br /><br />And what's pathetic is you are in your 30's and you do this all the time, it never gets old to you. But what your obviously ass pie induced mind doesn't grasp is that there are other users here. And it would be one thing if the layout on the home page had the username by the site so we could know off the bat who made it. but no. Umfuld has every right to call you out and what's more insane than everything is why you bash the moon crew and other users for killing ytmnd. <br /><br />Gotta love how you play on this site. You are jovst like Rush Limbaugh, the man who bashed stoners and then was indicted for doctorshopping narcotic pain killers.

 (3.00)

And all this time you and DarthWang thought you had no common ground! Well, there it is. You both called me "gay." An insult for the ages!!

 (5.00)

This is now top rated of all time! I vote 5 just to keep it there, for some reason.

With all due respect, the 50's and 60's had less government than in the 40's, as well as less government spending, but also much greater wealth.<br /><br />The 70's did not have less government than the 60's. Therefore, smaller government can not be blamed here for the troubles then.<br /><br />Corporate tyranny is what we have now, because corporations work with government. Right now, they actively help the government spy on us and some of them get bailed out after they fail and/or produce mediocrity.<br /><br />You say that life has gotten worse for most since the 1980s, but, the US government has been growing since then. It is now bigger than ever. Small government can not be blamed.<br /><br />Also, corporations are creations of government. For a company to be a corporation, it gets a charter from the government. Now, because of this, if the anarchists/anarcho-capitalists had their way, there would be no classic style corporations, at least not as we know them.

 (5.00)

Open letter from Zaalnog's great great grandson, Zoltraen (March, 2150)<br /><br />"When my great great grandfather started Lordship in 2013, he vowed to moderate administratively, as well as administrate moderately. This meant dealing with the then degenerate "moon guys", who were not the people who live in a hole on the moon that we know today. They were a primitive bunch of "under-voters" who believed in the chanting of nonsensical gibberish, something they called, "moon font", and the repetition of the same letter over and over again. It is unclear what they had meant, but it was believed they had an unwavering interest in "storage", which is why they were all rounded up and shot into the center of the moon. There was one user, known today as K-Ranger-L8, who made a few moon man sites, but was more interested in the intricacies of text-to-speech, then the run-on hate train, which was the moon guy's battle cry. He was spared and was instead converted into a cyborg coffee grinder, quesadilla press with built in .gif compatibility. Yes, Zaalnog was a gracious Lord, and a stern Lord. He would always say, "Stern Rules". He was good to the servers, always optimized for space, used mp3's when possible, and basically made fun of people instead of filling in the citations, which we all know was pure gold. It's hard to imagine that such a fine leader would need a publicized retraction in the form of a letter like this, but I'm here to declare once and for all, that Zaalnog, my Great Great Grandfather, did not give Marilyn Monroe GAIDS. We've been holding on to the proof for a long time now. We haven't felt that it was the business of the general public, but since Max V was crowned "King of the Internet", he's declared that historical records need to be adjusted for accuracy. He still has no comment as to the accuracy of the ytmnd search engine. Just remember that Zaalnog turned ytmnd from a mouldering shitheap, into a smouldering shitheap in just under two weeks with nothing but wit and a different colored username. But I'll tell you what he told my grandad. "We didn't begin this webpage, so just start typing, dog."

 (0.00)

Aw hell, really? That's insane. All the Chinese need to do is send over a dozen free crock-pots to some angsty immigrant kids and they can shut our economy down for a year. Too bad Alexi Vayner is dead, he woulda been perfect. It was bad enough when we spent a few billion dollars on a manhunt for the leader of a "leaderless cell structure" organization - which is exactly what the CIA counter-terrorism manual says not to do by the way. Well, he won't be watching any Gilligan reruns anymore, America FUCK YEAH.<br /><br />Americans are damned selfish, that won't change. 12 years after 9/11 is still "too soon" to do anything but drop in prayerful silence, but the day after we took out a few hundred Afghan civilians I had to hear gems like this at work: "Why are there no Wal-marts in Afghanistan?" "Because there's nothing but Targets!"

I don't necessarily disagree with any of that. We're sort of saying the same thing from two different directions - the intent of the organization is good. Their execution of that intent sucks shit. You can't evaluate a political individual, let alone an entire organization, based solely on their mandate.<br /><br />Most of the actual day-to-day work in environmental protection is done by state agencies. Like most federal agencies in the US, they direct where the money goes and get involved in research, so it's not really fair to evaluate their performance so much as it is to evaluate the state agencies under it...and, well, my most recent experience was in Texas. A TCEQ regulator who had jurisdiction over a rather dangerous industrial plant was fooled for three years by an inspection form that had been done once and signed 4 years ago instead of weekly like it was supposed to be, and then had the date changed with White-Out. Once every few months, he'd come around and the plant environmental manager (on parole for manslaughter) would take him out for margaritas before he would start the tour. I'm not joking or exaggerating, I wish I was.<br /><br />Oh, and in Texas, there's no zoning. This plant was surrounded on all sides by low-income housing, and they had enough barrels of toxic heavy metals to qualify as a chemical weapons depot that would have made Saddam Hussein a happy man.<br /><br />So yeah, I've been plenty of places where the rivers look like coffee and the USA isn't one (anymore), but that doesn't mean the govt. has its shit together either. We're too busy importing people with technical skills to do the shit we forgot how to do while our law schools churn out more lawyers than have ever been in one country in human history on our great national Race to the Bottom.<br /><br />Damn this thread got serious, what the hell.

 (0.00)

Let me just say this: I grew up as a geeky teenagers on isolated military bases overseas where a phone call home meant waiting in the queue all weekend, the internet was in its early early days and the only real contact we had on a daily basis was this new thing called Usenet that hadn't quite reached the civilian market outside of a couple universities. <br /><br />The point I've making is that I've been an observer of people arguing on the internet for longer than just about anyone else. We had one TV channel that just showed old sports and CNN reruns, and as entertaining as AFRTS commercials were, we had to entertain ourselves. So I watched a lot of educated people make fools of themselves online back when there were only a few thousand people there to piss each other off.<br /><br />One of the most important things I've learned is this: making assumptions about your adversary's real-life characteristics is not only pointless, it just reveals your bitterness, or in the parlance of our times, <br />U MAD? If you take a stab in the dark like "I bet you weigh 400 pounds" or "I bet you're some 60 year old geezer who mops the floor at a Wendy's" chances are you're going to be wrong, and being wrong in that way only strengthens the other person because they can laugh at your futile attempts to analyze them.<br /><br />Sorry for the seriousness pde, but watching you two go at endlessly is just a distraction and there are plenty of more entertaining flame wars that we need gr33nscr33n focused on at this time. Now if you excuse me I need to go get my weekly liposuction, pick up my social security check and go mop the floor at Wendy's.

 (5.00)

So is there some sort of product that can prevent you from spilling your spaghetti sauce all over the stove? Because if there is I need to buy one ASAP!

 (0.00)

1. zaalnog, I am not sure why a building collapsing for no reason at all (WTC7) does not arouse suspicions. I am not coming to any conclusions, just pointing out this type of extreme oddity.<br /><br />Yes, you do not need to prove a negative, but when there is an elephant in the living room, you pointed it out (like woman did), then get repeatedly attacked for doing so, would that not arouse suspicion on your part?<br /><br />[i]"2. Even if I provided an ironclad argument with inescapable logic, research, and evidence, you would not accept it. You are not looking at this issue with clear eyes. "[/i]<br /><br />you are using this as an excuse to NOT make an ironclad argument. this is a form of bluffing. It is like saying "Oh, what I have to say is so brilliant that you could not even understand it". Well, that may be your opinion that it is ironclad, but I will judge the evidence for myself. I don't need you to come to conclusions for me.<br /><br />And if you get all huffy at me for saying this, then I will simply disregard you.<br /><br />[i]"3. It's true that sometimes people call people they disagree with "crazy" as a way to dismiss them and insult them. But you know who else gets called "crazy"? Crazy people. Take your meds imo."[/i]<br /><br />This may be true, sure, but it does nothing to prove anyone is crazy. You seem so focused on demonizing the messenger, rather than discussing the evidence or lack thereof. Typically, people who know how to argue are interested in presenting evidence. But you seem fairly interested in bringing people down, which kind of convinces me you either can't really debunk or you are heavily emotionally invested in the issue.

Don't keep up with the goings-on of this site at all, but would be dedicated to retaining an archive of my site assets. As many know, websites such as "lou "read" - metal "books" music LONG AUDIO PARTE ONE" and "Tiger Woods entirely 0wnz a plastic bag [he 0wned it entirely]" are my livelihood. <br /><br />Is there going to be an easy way to do this if the site is going away? Will there definitely not be? HEY, WHO KNOWS?

 (0.00)

"In all honesty it's not that pointed. The votes are fair: I like some, don't like others (and really haven't seen any in a while that I really like). My comments are, admittedly, often jerky, but it's not personal. I'm just a jerk and I spend most of my time here enjoying the banter, as the sites themselves, for the most part, haven't been funny in a long time. The flame wars and comment rage, however, is still pretty amusing. <br /><br />When you make sites I like, I say so and vote accordingly. It's just that you have a lot of sites, and make a lot of sites. Like a number of other users here, there's a pattern to them now that often isn't funny anymore. But I promise I don't go out of my way to downvote you. I wouldn't take anything I say too seriously. You're more than welcomed to tease me back, more than welcomed to ignore me altogether if you like--neither will offend me. I don't take anything here personally and basically assume that because ytmnd is little more than a rude, offensive internet dork forum, that no one else does or should. Is all.<br /><br />I'm just messing around. If I write a "McLOL!" comment or whatever, it's just to irk JoeyJoeJoe as much as it is to provoke you. I promise that I don't go out of my way to mess with you."<br /><br />- Gr33nsc33n, October 4-5th, 2010

 (5.00)

"[i]I didn't call you a cheapskate, you fucking drool-lipped bitchmonkey. I called you a braggart[/i]."<br /><br />LOLUMAD?<br /><br />you said before:<br />"[i]I'd give him more money if he did exactly what I say!" Total bullshit. If $50 is a drop in the bucket for you then prove it.[/i]"<br /><br />Isn't this implying that I am a cheapskate because I apparently only gave a small fraction of what I could?<br /><br />I only gave him $100 up to this point because Max has not responded to me. He has not expressed any interest of keeping the site open any longer. Also, the last thing he said to me was condescending at best, or just plain insulting when he said "[i]Your'e pretty gullible, but you have a good heart[/i]".<br /><br />Now, I did intend to give him more donations, but only so much because it does not seem like it will have much difference on anything in terms of site shutdown, that is unless someone proves otherwise. I also tend to prefer to spread out things like donations, rather than a large lump sum.<br /><br />I am not convinced me there is anything wrong with site sponsorships. I think it sets a good example, even from the perspective of those who want max to have as much money as possible. I think when people see that others give good amounts at a charity, they are inspired to give more themselves.<br /><br />"[i]I just refuse to tell you how much I donated to the bitcoin fund because I have both wealth and class,[/i]"<br /><br />Isn't this bragging?<br /><br />"[i]And besides," you continued to brag, "bitcoin is stupid and max is stupid for using it." [/i]"<br /><br />I never said bitcoin was stupid, only I don't know much about it. I also have no idea whether it is going to Max. He himself made the following statement:<br /><br />"[i]What will you do with all your bitcoins?[/i]"

Of ALL the days for max to rise from his grave, how fitting is that the Jew picks Easter...only to crucify his only son, err, site. Have faith fellow users, for If there's any truth to the scriptures, err, news..."YTMND will resurrect itself shortly after" (Calender 4:1). Also, cocks.

 (5.00)

Only an idiot calls someone a cheapskate when they give less than the accused cheapskate (especially if they give nothing at all). Since you refuse to tell me how much you gave, even whether it is more than $100 (which I am currently up to), why should I take your accusation seriously?<br /><br />I am not sure what is wrong with taking credit for something that I actually did.<br /><br />I don't take the insult "self centered" seriously. Pretty much everyone is 98% of the time. Even when they are not thinking about it. Might as well use "air breather" as an insult.<br /><br />I am also not sure how bitcoin is superior to paypal. I suppose if bitcoin handling fees (assuming there are any) are less than those of a credit card or paypal, it might be. Can you pay the rent with it? Can you buy groceries with it? Most importantly in this context, can server bills be paid for it? I know you can do those things with regular currency.

 (0.00)

all right, there is apparently a good side to him

 (0.00)

this album is equivalent to kmfdm's new album knust. [b]just hearing the sample sounds like a mix of all there songs and made into a single.[/b]<br /><br />[i]loltastic they still suck.[/i]

 (0.00)

Since the paddles there are aligned directly opposite of one to another, it would appear to seem obvious that not only is Mr. Worf playing with himself but that all of his excessive touch screen manipulations are not having any effect whatsoever on the outcome of the game. In essence, therefore rendering his involvement utterly useless and completely irrelevant. Riker is beginning to suspect however, that Picard is actually playing a clever Captain's prank on the chief security officer and is simply playing along just for laughs. Later, in the Ready Room, they would both laugh about it , giving each other many Romulan high fives. Data is there too, he keeps trying laugh naturally but the result is always unsettling to behold. The android's face contorts into a grotesque mask resembling the disquieting grimace of a Ferengi sex offender. <br /><br />Dr. Crusher.

 (5.00)

This is the plan. Get your ass to Mars, and go to the Hilton Hotel and flash the shrimp shit at the front desk, that's all there is to it.

 (3.00)

Even more baseless accusations and insults. Explain how the Moon Crew is liberal ridden. Are you implying that the Moon Crew is under tyrannical rule simply because we ask our Crewmen not to make shitty and faggotry-filled ytmnds? Is it so wrong to ask that a member of the Moon Crew not create sites which routinely defile the awesome likeness of Moon Man?<br /><br />You keep calling me these terms like liberal and socialist, but these words are not empty; they have meaning. I have previously explained to you how I am not a liberal or a socialist, and therefore how the meanings of those words do not apply to me. As such, you might as well be calling me any other baseless insult, like poopy-head, as the lack of applicability to me is just the same.<br /><br />Yet, there is a difference between the term poopy-head and the two terms liberal and socialist. The terms liberal and socialist bring to mind the awful concepts of tolerance and the like. Naturally, the Moon Crew dislikes those two terms. Perhaps, by calling me those terms over and over again, you were hoping to convince current Crewmen that I am indeed corrupted by anti-Moon Man influences. Then, maybe, you thought you might be able to lure them into a new Crew created by you. However, this plan is foolish and will fail due to the fact that all present Crewmen are more intelligent than you, SantabotAI, and thus they will not be fooled by such a flawed scheme. Additionally, the dislike and condemnation of many of your sites is held not only by myself and BigX, but also by most other members of the Moon Crew. And even the members who can tolerate your awful sites can understand the reasons why said sites are detrimental to the Moon Crew, and why I had to expel you from the Crew.

 (0.00)

nothing is going to happen and let me tell you why.. because this world wont be over untill i say so. no one is going anywhere untill i get a fuckin girlfriend and do all the fun things couples do , like hold hands, cuddle and go to the mall, watch movies.. and then the world can explode. there is no way my will will allow it to happen before that time.

 (0.00)

[i]"I'm not sure you understand what the word marginally means. "[/i]<br /><br />Ok, lets see if I applied the word correctly: [u]http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/marginal[/u]<br /><br />The english language has many applications of the word. I went with [b]2b.[/b]<br />b : not of central importance <regards violence as a marginal rather than a central problem>; also : limited in extent, significance, or stature <had only marginal success with the business><br /><br />context example given:<br /><br />[b]Examples of MARGINAL[/b]<br /><br />[i]There has been only a [u]marginal[/u] improvement in her condition.[/i]<br /><br />Marginally better, mathematically speaking. 4.27 - 3.76 = 0.51. Or just over half a star. Or 11% of 5 stars.<br /><br />"And I'm a target for group downvoting."<br /><br />Is it because you are such a nice guy? This might work on some guy who just came here, but I have been in and out since 2006. I have seen the stuff you do. Including harass people. Including using alts to mass downvote other people's stuff. So, this complaint is hypocrisy.<br /><br /><br />"If faggot lacrossestar or jimmm posted the sites I posted in November most if not all of them would have scored between 4.40 and 4.70 and you're hopeless if you don't understand that."<br /><br />I'm sure you would prevent that with alt account downvoting.

 (0.00)

No one will ever do anything about the fact that the government is exponetially taking things over. We're at the bottom of the curve right now. Really, we can't do anything for a fundemental reason, we've become so morally decayed that we are now an easy populace to control. All they have to pacify immoral people is redistrubute the wealth to only those that might riot (there's other methods but that's the most used one). In a way, the government is just a reflection of our own moral decadence. You see, moral people cannot be controlled to do malicious acts because they are too just to resist them and will in fact go out of their way to stop people that do evil. But when a populace becomes morally corrupt, then you can easily control them because everyone is too selfish, too cowardly and ignorant to do anything about your suddenly increasing control over society. This is why the the elites simply don't care about people figuring it out, because if they aren't ignorant they're likely to be cowardly and selfish simply because of the aspects of our society. Also, they have a nice database on everyone and can search for specific terms if they ever got scared of a real revolution.<br /><br />Of course, everything is eventually going to collapse down because as we decay we create less and less things of real value meaning the leeches have less to leech off.