Mohammed doesn't change facial expressions
Created on: February 13th, 2006
Embassy Attack lol
Sponsorships:
| user | amount | user | amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| No one has sponsored this site ( ._.) | |||
| Sponsor this site! | Total: $0.00 | Active: $0.00 | |
Vote metrics:
| rating | total votes | favorites | comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| (4.2) | 699 | 23 | 104 |
View metrics:
| today | yesterday | this week | this month | all time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 40,325 |
Inbound links:
QUOTE: "5 for being smart... ottomans allowed muhammed to be pictorally portrayed.
too bad they don't remember their own history."
True. The dannish cartoon fiasco showed how easily manipulated and controlled the Muslim population is. They even had the nerve to attack a U.S. embassy... when the cartoons weren't drawn by us. They are similar to strict Christain conservatives in that they'd rather follow orders from a preacher than think for themselves.
Not that funny and... pretty sure that is all islamic made art, in which case....is not blasphemous? Some later works depicted mohammad depending on the region they were created, The reasons they got outranged in regards to the Denmark cartoons is because it was insulting, where as these are works made hundreds of years ago and are not insulting or stereotyping.
You lose, good day sir.
I'm upvoting because Muslims actually say that Muhammad's face cannot be drawn and in their own paintings they make his face shine (as if it's a light bulb) but since they had no clue of other people's art and culture (and in their invations they just burned it all because they didn't give a damn) other cultures were able to paint him as they say his face. People who downvote this should go get a clue first. I was brought up in a muslim country and lived there for 17 years of my life, however my metaphyisical beliefs are purely scientific and not categorizable. You could say I'm somewhere between agnostic and atheist.
Bold
Italic
Underline
Code
User Link
Site Link