lol, old cars
Created on: July 16th, 2006
lol, old cars
"Ricers" aren't so funny when your ugly antique box starts breaking down in the middle of the road or misses a turn due to sh*tty handling. Properly tuned compacts > old "muscle", bitches.

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(3.4) 15 1 9

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 0 0 0 2,244

Inbound links:

views url
17 https://www.bing.com
1 http://ytmnsfw.com/users/bic2/votes
1 http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2Fm3558WGnNL&h
1 https://www.google.com/

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
August 3rd, 2006
(1)
You should resubmit this, it only has 5 votes so far. It needs more exposure, pretty funny and well made, but then again I don't know what I'm talking about... lol
August 7th, 2006
(-1)
August 7th, 2006
(-1)
I believe you haven't met my friend Mazda RX7, which fits into neither category.
August 8th, 2006
(-1)
Also, rice rocket engines are more prone to breaking than muscle cars. A 1.4 litre engine isn't having a cakewalk producing 300HP in comparison to Mr. 4-Litre.
August 8th, 2006
(0)
There's more to driving than just pure HP, such as handling, power-to-weight ratio, aerodynamics, build quality... And with advancements in technology (VTEC, etc.), smaller engines are pushing more power, and efficiently too.
July 8th, 2007
(-1)
There's no replacement for displacement.
October 14th, 2007
(0)
No replacement for ignorant idiots like you, either. Go suck on a big fat exhaust pipe--oh wait, you probably do already when driving.
March 20th, 2008
(-1)
He's right there is no replacement for dispacement. I hate it when an engine produces 200hp......at 8,500RPM
April 2nd, 2008
(-1)
At least it's better than requiring 8 liters of displacement in a 3 ton ugly body to simply create 200hp. And like I said before, pure power isn't everything--in fact, pure power alone without control is BORING.