Rejected FadCats UPDATE 3, new names (+17% rejections)
Created on: August 31st, 2006
Post your name suggestions :)
I might even include them :)
tahnks for the namesuggestions
None ( ._.)
Sponsorships:
| user | amount | user | amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| No one has sponsored this site ( ._.) | |||
| Sponsor this site! | Total: $0.00 | Active: $0.00 | |
Vote metrics:
| rating | total votes | favorites | comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| (4.01) | 406 | 15 | 144 |
View metrics:
| today | yesterday | this week | this month | all time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 13,476 |
Inbound links:
| views | url |
|---|---|
| 57 | https://www.bing.com |
| 3 | http://216.18.188.175:80 |
| 1 | http://www.google.com |
| 1 | https://google.com |
| 1 | http://www.google.com.hk |
Wow ZuluZulu, you really are a flying moron, aren't you? Originally, I restrained myself from downvoting this atrocious effigy of NARVism (at it's worst). Instead I provided some inane blabber of censored words to back up your point of someone using expletives to make a point rather than discussing it like mature individuals. However, after indicting me of "wetting the bed", and accusing people who vote low on this "downvoters", I've no choice but to give this a 1.
Instead of poking fun at other people and manufacturing superfluous, satirical causes as to the reason behind people "downvoting" your site, why don't you think instead about why they did? Dyskrasia for instance- has an amazingly even votespread and a ton of awesome sites. But instead of revering him as someone to look up to, you accuse him of being a "downvoter". This site is a horrible idea with an appalling execution. I'm curious though, did you just use MSpaint for every frame?
Bold
Italic
Underline
Code
User Link
Site Link