¹~(^_^)> stephanie 404
Created on: October 20th, 2006
¹~(^_^)> stephanie 404
None ( ._.)

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(3.86) 1,503 121 732

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
1 2 4 0 152,169

Inbound links:

views url
52 http://www.getlazy.net/archive/lazytownlinks/
43 https://www.bing.com
19 https://www.google.com/
15 http://ytmnsfw.com/users/lazytown4/sites
13 https://rateyourmusic.com/

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
<< 1 2 3 >>
October 29th, 2006
(0)
STEPHANIE IS RESTORED! PRAISE JENOVAH! http://lazyfaprestored.ytmnd.com/
October 29th, 2006
(0)
i was watching this for about 21 minutes. the space out meter is goin crazy right now.
October 29th, 2006
(0)
IT STILL NEEDS MORE NEDM !
(0)
where went stephanie?
October 29th, 2006
(0)
Stephanie is here: http://lazyfaprestored.ytmnd.com/
October 29th, 2006
(0)
Why is this sponsered so much? wtf
October 29th, 2006
(0)
haha cool.
October 29th, 2006
(0)
WTB More Steph Works It Plz!!!
October 29th, 2006
(0)
music is boards of canada -- don't know what song, its used in some episode of saladfingers or something though
October 29th, 2006
(0)
bring me the pink pages!
October 29th, 2006
(0)
What song/sound clip is that? :)
October 29th, 2006
(0)
Bring our girl back please.
October 29th, 2006
(0)
SONG IS "STONE IN FOCUS" BY THE ONE AND ONLY APHEX TWIN. UK only release.
October 29th, 2006
(0)
fuggin amazing
October 29th, 2006
(0)
My conscience is clear, I'm 15. :)
October 29th, 2006
(0)
AAH whered it go i wanted to fap!?!
October 29th, 2006
(0)
Well... she's fifteen. Guess that's three years to early for some of us
October 29th, 2006
(0)
Most of you all deserve to be castrated
October 29th, 2006
(0)
5'd for my favorite Aphex Twin song.
October 29th, 2006
(0)
New song, and it is lovely...
October 29th, 2006
(0)
What's lame about continually changing a site: Sometimes you change it well, sometimes you change it and make it suck ass. And I want to rate the good ones a 5, but the sucky ones a 1. But since it's the same site, I can't rate what it changed into without changing my previous vote. How can you appropriately rate a site when it's content is always changing? Just make more new sites, not change one over and over.
October 29th, 2006
(0)
N*GG*R NOW IT SUX U JEW
October 29th, 2006
(0)
404 Version = Best.
October 29th, 2006
(0)
Aphex Twin - Stone in Focuz--Great song.
October 29th, 2006
(0)
NEEDS MORE STEPHANIE
October 29th, 2006
(0)
1 until you stop changing the site.... a change that usually makes it pretty horrible.
October 29th, 2006
(0)
what is this song called?
October 29th, 2006
(0)
404 version is cool, but it should be a separate site.
October 29th, 2006
(0)
^ I agree with funkwich.
October 29th, 2006
(0)
Dude, don't be a f*g and just make more spinoff sites.
October 29th, 2006
(0)
7\ STONE IN FOCUS 7\
October 29th, 2006
(0)
STOP CHANGING IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! JUST KEEP IT AS THE ORIGINAL GIF AND SOUND!!!!!!!! ITs so mesmerizing.....i love it....THIS NEW ONE SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!
October 29th, 2006
(0)
Awesome!!! Great song! stephanie 404 is perfect!
October 29th, 2006
(0)
nnnooooooooooooo! CHANGE IT. CHANGE IT!!!!!!!!!!
October 29th, 2006
(0)
You should keep this and make the others as separate ytmnd's. You'd be guaranteed to get lots of 5's. I especially liked the Thrillseekers one.
October 29th, 2006
(0)
lol
October 29th, 2006
(0)
Learn2cite
October 29th, 2006
(0)
$150 ftw \m/
October 29th, 2006
(0)
I like this one better. :)
October 29th, 2006
(0)
...
October 29th, 2006
(0)
wow u r gay, y keep changing it?
October 29th, 2006
(0)
"How can you appropriately rate a site when it's content is always changing ? -evaxephon" i totally agree, content should not be changable after creation imo, our votes r being tallied for the original.
October 29th, 2006
(0)
This top view gimmick nonsense is getting annoying.
October 29th, 2006
(0)
This is f*cking stale. but 3'd for salad fingers music (wasnt that aphex?)
October 29th, 2006
(0)
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! bring her back!
October 29th, 2006
(0)
ur a f*g now
October 29th, 2006
(0)
Salad Finger music gives you instant +3, and making the site not for pedos gives you +2. :D YOU WIN
October 29th, 2006
(0)
dude thats awesome. You just gained a +1
October 29th, 2006
(0)
better music
October 30th, 2006
(0)
you suck for changing it every other day, and for that you get a 1 (and that Wont change anymore). Enjoy.
October 30th, 2006
(0)
BRING BACK OLD PIC, OR THIS TIME IM REALLY CALLING THE FBI!!! >.
October 30th, 2006
(0)
"Please change the music back to something NOT f*cking gay. more techno" LMAO! You do realize that techno music is THE music genre of choice of gay culture, right?
October 30th, 2006
(0)
LazyTown - Wish this wasn't where I was writing this, but you gotta know. You are completely off mark. In what part of my post did I state that America is the pinnacle of morality in which we should universally consider pedophilia laws? What I was posting about is that it is BS to state that in the 1800s, age of consent was 8-10 years old, and that pedophilia is thus okay somehow. Also feminism in the 1800s WAS deeply tied to age of consent laws. It was a backdoor strategy by the...
October 30th, 2006
(0)
Women Christian Temperance Union to criminalize rape. They had campaigns to raise the age of consent and to make statutory rape laws. This helped them strengthen laws against rape, as it was an effective political strategy to open the door to say that all rape was bad. Acting on pedophilia is rape. Rape was compaigned against because women wanted the right to justice against the crime. Some of WCTU were probably raped at a young age. Think women liked rape? How much clearer does the correlation need to be?
October 30th, 2006
(0)
Stone in Focus.
October 30th, 2006
(0)
smakula has the RAPE F3VA!!!1 XD speaking of backdoor strategies... 1'd for constant sound and image changes.
October 30th, 2006
(0)
Wow, sweet!
October 30th, 2006
(0)
Nice use of Stone in Focus.
October 30th, 2006
(0)
shes f*cking 15, you child perverts.
October 30th, 2006
(0)
All this getting a top listed site then changing it around is gaytarded.
October 30th, 2006
(0)
Stephanie is back! http://lazyfaprestored.ytmnd.com/
October 30th, 2006
(0)
i hate this change
October 30th, 2006
(0)
whoops, you changed the ytmnd. whoops, my vote just lost 4 stars. f*ggot.
October 30th, 2006
(0)
Good job, you get a 4.
October 30th, 2006
(0)
now is the time for all good men to downvote pedos
October 30th, 2006
(0)
+4 for Stone in Focus
October 30th, 2006
(0)
lol good one
October 30th, 2006
(0)
WHAT THE F*CK! WHERE DID IT GO?!?!
October 30th, 2006
(0)
Stephanie's disappearance here corresponds with http://cake-themovie.ytmnd.com/ Magical. Awesome 404 graphic and song too.
October 30th, 2006
(0)
credit music on the stephanie 404 please.
October 30th, 2006
(0)
error = win!
October 30th, 2006
(0)
Dude!!! I know that music! It's the main menu music from Afraid of Monsters! I f*cking LOVE that music!
October 30th, 2006
(0)
Where the hell did you get a digital copy of Stone in Focus? I thought it was vinyl-only...
October 30th, 2006
(0)
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!! lol 5
October 30th, 2006
(0)
aphex twin = 5
October 30th, 2006
(0)
WHERE DID STEPHANIE GO
October 30th, 2006
(0)
"All this getting a top listed site then changing it around is gaytarded."
October 30th, 2006
(0)
5 for aphex twin
October 30th, 2006
(0)
yay, aphex twin.
October 30th, 2006
(0)
PUT IT BACK!!!!!
October 30th, 2006
(0)
stone in focus... 5
October 30th, 2006
(0)
better than the previous.
October 30th, 2006
(0)
f*ck you for using that lovely song.
October 30th, 2006
(0)
"It was also socially acceptable to have slaves." oh burn
October 30th, 2006
(0)
Salad Fingers
October 30th, 2006
(0)
The music reminds me of the save rooms in Resident Evil O.o
October 31st, 2006
(0)
This was standard Stephanie-fare at first, with credits to the superimposing job, but slightly changing a site every few days and renaming it to milk views? Feeble ploy.
October 31st, 2006
(1)
Smakula - Firstly, I agree that it is irritating to try and have a discussion in the comments section, but oh well. I am not knowledgeable about the AOC laws circa 19th century America, though they were undoubtedly significantly lower than they are now --so if you say it was 8-10 yrs old I will have to take your word for it. However, you initially brought up America with your first post, and that prompted me to respond. You seem . . .
October 31st, 2006
(1)
to be insinuating that I am one of the said people who condone pedophilic actions vis-a-vis relating it back to earlier AOC laws; that isn't the case, however. Now, show me where I claim that womens rights and AOC laws aren't tied together? I stated that womens rights and PEDOPHILIA has a shaky connection at best, not the AOC. If you would re read my posts, you'll see that I am pointing out that America's laws and history of legality/illegality (or criminality for the puritans here) dealing with statutory rape should be of no consequence to people of other nations.
October 31st, 2006
(1)
Apparantly, you didn't understand/realize the point of my posts: I objected to the implication that engaging in consensual sexual activity with a peripubescent was explicitly connected to opression of women. This is why other countries shouldn't concern themselves with Americas past here, AOC laws differ the world over, and few, if any, deal with the issue of prepubescents specifically. We are on the same page as far as pedophilia goes, but you have no argument when it comes to Stephanie.
October 31st, 2006
(1)
Therefore I just wanted to point that out. She is not a prepubescent. AOC laws should be based around biological psychology and physiology, and I suppose sociological factors; not religious instiutions or policitally motivated orginizations as is the case today. Lastly, I did some research on the WCTU, and couldn't find any information pertaining to your claim, and I would appreciate a link or 2 for some reading. They appear to be feminist second to their religious/political motives.
October 31st, 2006
(0)
calm down its just a website
October 31st, 2006
(0)
ASSC*CK downvoted your site. (http://ytmnd.com/users/ASSC*CK/votes) ASSC*CK is the alternate account of "gellieman." Downvote accordingly.
October 31st, 2006
(0)
F, Just die in a fire.
October 31st, 2006
(0)
Wow, LazyTownN. You just completely obliterated that guys argument.
October 31st, 2006
(0)
Talk about eerie...
October 31st, 2006
(0)
Darn.
October 31st, 2006
(0)
what movie does that song play in?
October 31st, 2006
(0)
Lol at ignorant people, girls are developed for sexual activity by age 12
October 31st, 2006
(0)
WTF. I came here to do my hourly fap and all I see is some static >_< Ah well... I guess that's fappable too
October 31st, 2006
(0)
its actually a better site in its new form.
October 31st, 2006
(0)
You made this awsome by making her not found. Because I don't like her and don't want her around me or my children.
October 31st, 2006
(0)
thank god it has been changed. damn perverts
October 31st, 2006
(0)
i already saved the old gif...
October 31st, 2006
(0)
5 for use of Aphex Twin
October 31st, 2006
(0)
WTF CHANGE IT BACK YOU GAY. IM CHANGING MY VOTE.
October 31st, 2006
(0)
5 for teh change! ANTI-LOLI FTW!!!
October 31st, 2006
(0)
5, 1 FBI, 5, 1 404.
October 31st, 2006
(0)
Winners dont use Stephanie.
October 31st, 2006
(0)
The music is broken? It won't loop anad cuts out after 3 seconds. Otherwise, great site!
October 31st, 2006
(0)
i like the change....we all look less like perverts.
October 31st, 2006
(0)
lol, note the word "less."^^^^^
November 1st, 2006
(0)
stone in focus = 5
November 1st, 2006
(0)
Great site. -1 for deleting the original
November 1st, 2006
(0)
http://lazyfaprestored.ytmnsfw.com/ http://lazyfaprestored.ytmnsfw.com/ http://lazyfaprestored.ytmnsfw.com/ http://lazyfaprestored.ytmnsfw.com/
November 1st, 2006
(0)
Seriously though, you can bring her back now.
November 1st, 2006
(0)
wtf happened to it it says not found lol
November 1st, 2006
(0)
People didn't donate good money for you to kill the site. Now this is #2. It could have been #1 forever. You fail and should be shot.
(0)
the worst thing is, 84000 people have read my comment about dog-sex
November 1st, 2006
(0)
fad name ftl
November 1st, 2006
(0)
http://www.livejournal.com/userpic/40032351/1065899 ................. heres a buddy icon for you guys LMAO
November 1st, 2006
(0)
Advancer: "People didn't donate good money for you to kill the site. Now this is #2. It could have been #1 forever. You fail and should be shot." Exactly.
November 1st, 2006
(0)
Cmon! Change it back! It's loosing popularity now!!! >:( :0 :0 >:(
November 1st, 2006
(0)
stone in focus
November 1st, 2006
(0)
LazyTown - My original point was that you can't use America's past AOC laws to justify arguing against current AOC laws. I believe that past AOC laws were a way for older men to put a moral face on their marriage (leading to sex) with vastly underaged girls. As women gained rights, they wanted this changed. It may have been a political strategy for feminism, but that was one side of the coin. I think their experience also played a part in wanting the change (here is where I see oppression).
November 1st, 2006
(0)
I think that women wanted that to change, but due to no rights, it was not possible. I could be wrong there, but I think 13 year olds weren't too excited about marrying 30 year olds. So here is where I see the link; early AOC laws protected the reputation of people with pedophilic urges (IMO), it pretty much made pedophilia normal. With women having no rights, they had little access to change that, but eventually did. I don't have internet sources atm, but I was going on Sociology 104 notes.
November 1st, 2006
(0)
You don't need to use the example of past AOC laws to make the arguement that today the laws are absurd. No more than feel-good policy. Also, I doubt even half of the people who were marrying 13 yr olds were pedophiles, the definition of pedophile states that one must have sexual attraction exclusively, or mainly towards prepubescents. If you want to make the arguement that 19th century AOC laws occasionally protected ones pedophilic actions, then one could easily reverse that and say that todays --
November 1st, 2006
(0)
In case I haven't conveyed this correctly yet, I think the surge of women's rights resulted in pedophilia being depicted as a more villainous act in our society by way of raising the AOC, thus keeping marriage from putting a moral face on marrying and sexing young girls.Pedophilia is not directly an oppression of women's rights, but it seems that as a result of those rights, pedophilia was vilified here. You point to a more global scale, and I think we are most likely not on the same page in this argument.
November 1st, 2006
(0)
AOC laws systematically brand innocent people as pedophiles for not adhering to the ridiculous government mandated, politically and/or religiously driven policies currently in place. If it was a political tool in the 19th century, then it surely is today as well --but to another end. Like I stated before, acting on pedophilia is wrong, but for politicians to moprh the definition of the medical condition/disorder (depending on how you view the issue) at whim to their advantage is a harmful abuse of power,
November 1st, 2006
(0)
And yes Chuft, it seems I did used AOC and marriage age as the same thing, when I should have been using marriage age. But in taht regard, it applies to my argument. The push was for a higher marriage age, because a low marriage age made it institutionally okay to have sex with young girls. This is all from a feminist view point, which I am going off of.
November 1st, 2006
(0)
and denies individuals of specific rights. AOC laws should be based around biological psychology and physiology, and I suppose sociological factors; not religious instiutions or policitally motivated orginizations as is the case today. I should hope you're capable of appreciating such a view, Smakula.
November 1st, 2006
(0)
I'm with Chuft on all of this. It was common in ancient Greece for girls to start having sex regularly at age 12. However, with the advent of technology, and religious teachings having rooted itself into our culture, that would not be appropriate or practical today; and that is exactly why I include sociological factors in the process of coming to a scientifically based, biologically concious AOC standard.
November 1st, 2006
(0)
Smakula, you're a feminist?
November 1st, 2006
(0)
GIVE ME PINK! FAP FAP FAP
November 1st, 2006
(0)
In my opinion, regardless of it being a politically or religiously motivated to keep AOC laws high, it is beneficial to keep them at around 17. It may seem like a ridiculously strict government mandate to some, but to others it seems like a safeguard on the naive nature of young ones. I'd be alright to argure this more, but not here in a comments page. Last word goes to you.
November 1st, 2006
(0)
5'd for Stone in Focus.
November 1st, 2006
(0)
Yes, I subscribe to many feminist beliefs. Men can be feminists, and it's not all about angry women who think all men are pigs and that nonsense. Not trying to put those words in your mouth, but that is the common view of it.
November 1st, 2006
(0)
http://lazyfaprestored.ytmnd.com fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fa
November 1st, 2006
(0)
5 for the god damned f*cking song
November 1st, 2006
(0)
I don't see what would prompt you to be a feminist. That means you believe there is an institutionalized discrimiation towards women? Because frankly, I don't see it. From the feminists that I've met, all of their ideas have been very vauge and abstract, typically revolving around past percieved injustices; spitting out nothing more than 60's era slogans. The other kind I've come into contact with are no more than motivational speakers who only discuss topics concerning females.
November 1st, 2006
(0)
Also hypocrites desiring artificial equality.
November 1st, 2006
(0)
Utterly stupid.
November 1st, 2006
(0)
It seems to me as if Magnús Scheving intentionally added a certain level of eroticism to the Stephanie character. I don't think it was by chance.
November 1st, 2006
(0)
"all I know is, I wouldn't watch LazyTown if the superhero was some muscular woman and the child star was a dancing teenage boy. screw that." That would definately be gay to the max.
November 2nd, 2006
(0)
Where'd she go? I miss her so.
November 2nd, 2006
(0)
someone please explain what this has to do with having sex with her...
November 2nd, 2006
(0)
"It seems to me as if Magnús Scheving intentionally added a certain level of eroticism to the Stephanie character. I don't think it was by chance." ..One would be inclined to think that only after spending too much time around here, taking scenes out of context for a laugh. ;) Just because adult innuendo is projected onto a show like this doesn't mean innuendo was there to begin with.
November 2nd, 2006
(0)
Also, your notion stems from the fact that we're talking about a pretty pink haired girl who those outside Lazytown's age demographic may see as resembling anime characters that are much more in line with your claim.
November 2nd, 2006
(0)
LOL!!! YES IT'S GOnE!!! AHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHH
November 2nd, 2006
(0)
I actually like the 404 error better than the original.
November 2nd, 2006
(0)
:(
November 2nd, 2006
(0)
PUT IT BACK!!!!
November 2nd, 2006
(0)
Go here for steph http://real-stephanie.ytmnd.com/
November 2nd, 2006
(0)
five for trippy =)
November 2nd, 2006
(0)
http://pleasegetalife.ytmnd.com/
November 3rd, 2006
(0)
Yes, she's gone! Now let us rave to her shiny silhouette. *Mosh*
November 3rd, 2006
(0)
Clever.
November 3rd, 2006
(0)
and don't forget http://pleasegetalife.ytmnd.com/
November 3rd, 2006
(0)
i f*ck real little girls.
November 3rd, 2006
(0)
You used f*cking Aphex Twin on a paedophile-induced sh*tty YTMND??? F*ck you.
November 3rd, 2006
(0)
VBBY - "i know this girl personally and if she knew all these sites were being made about her she'd cry forever." ...Woah. For those who aren't aware, Steph's actress Julianna Rose Mauriello is a genuinely sweet and talented person who deserves the best, which is why LOL innuendo/pedo gags and accompanying lewd remarks get old and and on my nerves after a while. I imagine the creator of this site similarly felt that things were getting out of hand, hence the (awesome) 404.
November 3rd, 2006
(0)
In my opinion (I don't know what America's law deems, nor the average of other nations laws) a pedophile would be someone who near excluseively has an attraction towards pre-pubescent children. The biological capable and desire to reproduce happens around 12 for each sex (give or take). However, things get complicated at this point. Society has certain expectations of their youth and I think this is where most of the points of contention come in.
November 4th, 2006
(0)
Sponsored!
November 4th, 2006
(0)
"For those who aren't aware, Steph's actress Julianna Rose Mauriello is a genuinely sweet and talented person who deserves the best, which is why LOL innuendo/pedo gags and accompanying lewd remarks get old. . ." Ah, so we agree once again, Nuroticat. Juli definitely deserves our respect. Not only that, but, from the limited footage and interviews I have seen of her, she seems to be a very sweet and down-to-earth person who does NOT deserve the trashing of her image, even if it is "Just a Joke."
November 4th, 2006
(1)
WHO THE FU CK DO YOU THINK YOU ARE? YOU'RE NOT HER DAD. YOU MISS THE WHOLE GOD DAMN POINT OF YTMND IF YOU DON'T WANT TO MAKE FUN OF SH IT.
November 4th, 2006
(0)
I know goddamned well who I am, sir, and I'm frankly not in the mood to be insulted by some NARV imbecile who obviously has no idea of what he is saying. I know full well what YTMND is, and what its "point" is, and if you do not have anything mature to say then I suggest you sod off and crawl into whatever little hole you came from, Mr. Two-Votes. Also, horsedick.
November 4th, 2006
(0)
Words cannot express how great this YTMND is.
November 4th, 2006
(0)
I never said that all of YTMND was bad for Lazytown, chuft. There are some great Lazytown YTMNDs out there (such as this one), and we have probably given more free publicity than any other site on the web, which is never a bad thing. What I am saying, however, is that the sites/comments that, seriously or not, give the impression of "we think Stephanie=sex toy/pedophile's dream" are really unwarranted. In all honesty, I enjoyed some of them back in the day, but now the joke is wearing thin, and
November 4th, 2006
(0)
it really reflects poorly on us as well. I have heard many people declare YTMNDers "sick f*cks" and "freaks" because their only experience here was that fad. I don't know about you, but I don't really want that image.
November 4th, 2006
(0)
shytty music
November 4th, 2006
(0)
Who cares about image, its freaking YTMND. go do charity work or something and get liked IRL.
November 4th, 2006
(0)
Yo es simpatico
November 4th, 2006
(0)
"Who cares about image, its freaking YTMND. go do charity work or something and get liked IRL." To each his own, I guess. lol, internet :P
November 4th, 2006
(0)
Once again, you rule cinnamonroffles. :)
November 4th, 2006
(0)
I hate you.
November 5th, 2006
(0)
what this site get closed down for loli? lols
November 5th, 2006
(0)
I wanna do it by the book.
November 5th, 2006
(0)
f*g
November 5th, 2006
(0)
cinnamonroffles, I agree.
November 5th, 2006
(0)
Okay, look, this YTMND is great except one thing: The music. Why use such a wonderful song, RDJ's Stone In Focus, on a site like this? That is one of my favorite songs and this is probably one of the worst possible uses for it; I've spent some time trying to think of a worse situation, but... I can't think of one. This should have something exciting and peppy for music. Just a suggestion.
November 6th, 2006
(0)
Loving it.
November 6th, 2006
(0)
F*CK THIS SITE
November 6th, 2006
(0)
Yeah! F*ck those sites!
November 6th, 2006
(0)
Dr-1337 HAX?
November 6th, 2006
(0)
no, f*ck you
November 6th, 2006
(0)
404 - significant humor not found.
November 6th, 2006
(0)
...YTMND is dead.
November 6th, 2006
(0)
not bad
November 6th, 2006
(0)
HAH. Nice.
November 6th, 2006
(0)
upvoted for your new title
November 6th, 2006
(0)
Censorship of any form is a bad thing, especially when you have the choice not to view it. Steph's actress Julianna Rose Mauriello is a sexual deviant who probably does cocaine like everyone else in showbiz. Or she's not. Regardless of what I say or what sites are made, she will be the same bitch/nice person that she was before. The only difference being... if you censor... you kill a piece of liberalism, and we don't get to laugh. Period. Burning cats should be allowed.
November 6th, 2006
(0)
FIVE FOR AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX AFX
November 6th, 2006
(0)
Every time you censor, God kills a bit of liberalism. Please, think of the liberalism!
November 6th, 2006
(0)
where did she go?
November 6th, 2006
(0)
5 for not being dr-l337
November 6th, 2006
(-1)
1 FOR NOT BEING DR.L337
November 6th, 2006
(0)
Not that I was implying censorship. . . .
November 6th, 2006
(0)
lol, 5 because i clicked on this just when the arrows were pointing to a Dr.-L337 site.
(0)
liked it >> 5 for AFX :)
November 6th, 2006
(0)
http://esurancesex.ytmnd.com/ Erin ESurance is hotter anyhow.
November 7th, 2006
(0)
I don't know why, but I love this YTMND. Well done, very creative.
November 12th, 2006
(0)
FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP
November 17th, 2006
(1)
I still look at this this sometimes. :(
November 22nd, 2006
(0)
Aphex Twin Cannot be downvoted.
November 27th, 2006
(0)
Do you guys know what happend few days ago when this site, thehive, and the Dr 1337 Returns site all said "F*CK THIS SITE "? It's a conspiracy. Those 3 accounts might have something to do with this sickness. It's porbably the reason why this kiddy show is still popular. This is definitely a gimmick account...and it has links with 1337 and HiveMindedIndividuals...don't get caught up with his/her/its sites, or you'll be owned in the worst way possible.
November 30th, 2006
(0)
December 4th, 2006
(0)
my peniscopter goes FAPFAPFAPFAPFAPFAPFAPFAPFAPFAPFAPFAPFAPFAPFAP
December 6th, 2006
(0)
id still f*ck her.
December 12th, 2006
(0)
there are no words to describe such win.
December 28th, 2006
(0)
Your failure disgust me
January 3rd, 2007
(-1)
"I have trouble understanding how a 8 year old girl (well the actress is older but the character) with no breasts and a PINK WIG could be physically attractive? I'm highly disturbed by about 85% of YTMND members. This is really giving YTMND a terrible image by being on top of the sponsored list. No wonder YTMND is getting less and less hits lately"
January 3rd, 2007
(0)
F*ggot
January 13th, 2007
(0)
Why did this site get changed?
January 28th, 2007
(0)
friggin sweet
February 3rd, 2007
(0)
Damn, you had stone In focus on here too. Meh..... So like, whats with YTMND and stephanie? She's just some 10 year old girl who sings about kids stuff..... It doesnt make sense....
February 13th, 2007
(0)
It's almost sad to look back on this now, considering how many new and pedo-rific (on a subliminal level, of course) things you have moved on to. But, as a final fare-thee-well, I have this to say: When a Man Lies, He murders/Some part of the World/These Are the Pale Deaths/Which Men Miscall Their Lives/All this I Cannot Bear to Witness Any Longer/Cannot the Kingdom of Salvation Take Me Home? Also, c*cks.
February 28th, 2007
(0)
"did I tell you that I forwarded this to my brother at Pepsi-cola's marketing dept awhile back?" no, not that I know of. also fuzzhammersignificant creeps me out here. :D
March 3rd, 2007
(0)
Hawt.
March 11th, 2007
(0)
The music really establishes a dirty and disturbing atmosphere. 5'd und fav'd ja?
March 19th, 2007
(0)
Jesus...why is this song on the soundtrack? This site constantly changed music and sh*t.
March 23rd, 2007
(0)
5'd for steph again
April 26th, 2007
(0)
Hmm, need moar steph plz.
May 2nd, 2007
(0)
I can't believe I haven't pointed out just how much I like this one. Relaxing and mysterious (internet rhetoric award for you).
May 9th, 2007
(0)
Lolz 404
May 11th, 2007
(0)
Never got to vote on it when it first came out so I'll do that now.
July 4th, 2007
(0)
June 17th, 2008
(0)
Whatever happend to Lazytown4? He just disappeared a few months ago.
September 15th, 2008
(0)
Bring her back dammit
July 20th, 2009
(0)
this has real purdy music
January 16th, 2010
(0)
penis
April 26th, 2015
(0)
1
April 8th, 2021
(0)
Stone in Focus is the best of Aphex Twin's works.

Fight me.
<< 1 2 3 >>