6/6/07 YTMND Garbage Day (Now with 100% more GARBAGEBAY)
So I've offended everyone by saying deleteing garbage sites will help with bandwidth. Of course the effect is minimal on money, but would still be quite useful for the community to weed out some of the many, many awful unoriginal sites. So come 6/6, del

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(3.68) 158 1 118

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 3 1 3 7,007

Inbound links:

views url
50 https://www.bing.com
9 http://www.google.com.hk
4 http://216.18.188.175:80
2 https://www.google.com/
1 http://www.google.com

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
(0)
ok fine
June 1st, 2007
(12)
the people who would do this arent the ones that need their sites deleted
June 1st, 2007
(0)
Unfortunately, very true.
June 1st, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
Besides the "report this site" button this is one of the only other things we can do presently to help out ytmnd. so why not?
June 1st, 2007
(4)
Low rated sites do not get a lot of views so they really aren't wasting bandwidth. The best thing to do to help YTMND is downvote crappy sites and tell people why you downvoted them. There is no reason why we need more epic, face melters, myspace suicide sites.
June 1st, 2007
(2)
hank the rapper is right. I downvoted this because I always hated the kid in class that stood up and said "Let's all pitch in gang and not pass distracting notes" right in front of the teacher, who was actually kinda hot.
June 1st, 2007
(7)
someguy makes a very good point, doing this would imply that you actually care about ytmnd while I'd say 90% of the garbage is made by people who just spam inside jokes and furry porn.
June 1st, 2007
(-7)
[ comment (and 4 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-7)
sh*tty sites don't consume bandwidth sh*tty sites don't consume bandwidth sh*tty sites don't consume bandwidth sh*tty sites don't consume bandwidth sh*tty sites don't consume bandwidth sh*tty sites don't consume bandwidth sh*tty sites don't consume bandwidth sh*tty sites don't consume bandwidth sh*tty sites don't consume bandwidth sh*tty sites don't consume bandwidth sh*tty sites don't consume bandwidth sh*tty sites don't consume bandwidth sh*tty sites don't consume bandwidth sh*tty sites don't consume band
June 1st, 2007
(-1)
agreed. I regularily delete my worst rated ytmnd.
June 1st, 2007
(-1)
My test site :S
June 1st, 2007
(-1)
I agree.
June 1st, 2007
(-2)
I will delete all my sites by the end of the day.
June 1st, 2007
(-1)
Hell I decided to do it early :P
June 1st, 2007
(2)
I agree. I deleted all under 3 stars :)
(-1)
I might as well get rid of all of mine except NEDMmisconception I keep getting E-venged left and right I might as well
June 1st, 2007
(-1)
nice
June 1st, 2007
(-1)
Not a bad idea. I'm rather afraid of letting go of my children, however . . . even the black sheep . . .
June 1st, 2007
(0)
Theres gotta be at least one really really black sheep no?
June 1st, 2007
(0)
^^not being racist ;-)
(0)
"RRKfan doesn't care about black sheep." Anyway, good idea. Unfortunately it probobly won't work. Sadly I have no sites of my own to delete.
June 1st, 2007
(-1)
song sucks
June 1st, 2007
(1)
how about delete all joshcube, michalewolfson, and sh*t related to them and their gheyness?
June 1st, 2007
(-1)
Bad Coding And Grey Goose
(-1)
Bad Goose And Grey Coding
June 1st, 2007
(-1)
good idea, if it doesnt work, max may have to switch to aristocrat!
June 1st, 2007
(0)
as long as we keep him from vladdy...
(-1)
But then won't this site get deleted on 6/6? How will people know to dump their sites on that day? Plus all my sites are genius just saying.
June 1st, 2007
(-1)
I'll do it
June 1st, 2007
(0)
what do you say? anything less than a 4 for this guy^
June 1st, 2007
(-1)
Damn you, I was expecting the 'GARBAGE DAY!' clip from Silent Night Deadly Night
June 1st, 2007
(-1)
actually, my audio buddy isn't online or i was going to have him making me a GARBAGE BAY remix...I might get ahold of him anyway.
(-1)
Yeah the lack of GARBAGE DAY! shocked me.
June 1st, 2007
(-1)
For you guys..*edit*
June 1st, 2007
(-1)
much better, 5 for you
(0)
Well done, I've done my part.
(-2)
New plan EVERY ONE MAKE GARBAGE DAY SITES this will vanish off of U&C and into the abyss since it lacks stolen gifs from 4chan!
June 1st, 2007
(0)
i can think of alot of repeat cosby, 300tmnd, drL337, Jem is not outrageous, mistitled sights luring you in with tits and its not... ect ect
June 1st, 2007
(-5)
[ comment (and 9 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-5)
Does anyone really give a f*ck? Are you paying for the bandwidth?
June 1st, 2007
(-1)
How about a compromise? BTape, Syncan and all the other YTMND elitists can delete all the 100's of sh*tty sites they make.
June 1st, 2007
(2)
We could get rid of about thousands of ptkfgsmaster2maryo's sites, and keep the 2 rated over a 3.
June 1st, 2007
(2)
Sorry, but I want to keep my title as user with the most sites
June 1st, 2007
(1)
But you suck c*cks...unless you have good music in your sites like that narcissm one.
(-1)
A welcome development. Also, D-Day.
June 1st, 2007
(-1)
Good call... almost forgot about D-Day!
June 1st, 2007
(0)
I got rid of the ones I had that were
June 1st, 2007
(0)
shoulnd't you delete sites with high views? they use more bandwidth than low viewed sites
June 1st, 2007
(2)
that doesn't do anything
June 1st, 2007
(0)
anything less than a 4 for this guy^
June 1st, 2007
(0)
I'm not fourest. I won't delete sites just because they have a low rating.
June 1st, 2007
(0)
Good idea. But the ones who we need to delete them...won't.
June 1st, 2007
(-1)
Also my birthday.
June 1st, 2007
(-1)
But yeah, at least 50% of ytmnd's are utter garbage. They need to be taken care of.
June 1st, 2007
(2)
It's the 500,000 identical fad based sites that need to be taken out, really. They should all be in dumpsters rather than helping the process.
June 1st, 2007
(1)
The problem is this will save little space. The thing about it is, people willing to do this have YTMNDs that are aren't SO bad they need to be deleted. The problem is a HUGE portion of this website are people that come on YTMND for 3 minutes, take a picture of their friend off of FaceBook and slap an audio recording of them saying "LOSER!!" and throw it out there. They do not care about the rating or anything like that. Alot of users don't even watch YTMNDs, just make them. :/
June 1st, 2007
(0)
[ comment (and 1 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
Sh*tty sites only consume bandwidth if they are viewed a lot (like all WoW YTMNDS,) otherwise they just take up hard disk space on some server. They do booger up the searches though, so I'm all for trashing them.
June 1st, 2007
(-1)
I don't feel like amending the description, but even if it saves a minimal amnt of space, wouldnt deleting garbage sites make the experience on ytmnd a little better?
June 1st, 2007
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
f*ck off
June 1st, 2007
(0)
maybe you dont understand the meaning of bandwidth consumption? sh*t can sit on the server's hard drives for years and no one will care. each site takes up like 1 mb. that means if u can go to best buy and get a 300 gig HD for $100 (i dont know the accual prices at the moment) thats about 300,000 sites, or a fraction of a penny per site. its the thought that counts tho.
June 1st, 2007
(0)
The way I look at it, if any of my sites are below 3.00, I delete them. 3.00 means its average so if its less, then it probably sucks.
June 1st, 2007
(0)
but yeah i imagine max prolly still spends a few dollars a day on stupid f*cking "hey look st this goofy looking kid from my biology class, imma put the price is right sound up with his picture sites." please delete them all.
June 1st, 2007
(-1)
Do it for Max. Do it for the Grey Goose.
June 1st, 2007
(-1)
I gave you 5 stars not only for the cause, but for using the audio of one of the best scenes in movie history.
June 1st, 2007
(0)
sorry, any one that has "100% more ..." in the title gets 100% more 1's.
June 1st, 2007
(0)
i get downvoted for no garbage day, i add it, i get downvoted again.
June 1st, 2007
(-1)
1 for succumbing to peer pressure
June 1st, 2007
(0)
I say we just delete all nedm.
June 1st, 2007
(0)
but then I won't have any sites at all
June 1st, 2007
(0)
When I read the blog I instantly deleted mine. Good ytmnd but most people here won't do it.
June 1st, 2007
(0)
You'll have to make my crappy YTMNDs by force, sorry, but that's the way it is
(0)
K, sure!
June 1st, 2007
(-2)
the idea makes perfect sense. i say its time for an auto-deletion after 3 months if a site rests below a 2.0 rating.
June 1st, 2007
(-1)
Hey! I have an idea! Why doesn't one of the lazy n*gg*rs on the staff code something that will delete all sites below a certain rating?
June 1st, 2007
(0)
LOL SELF REPLY CONSUME BANDWIDTH!!!1 LOL SELF REPLY CONSUME BANDWIDTH!!!1 LOL SELF REPLY CONSUME BANDWIDTH!!!1 LOL SELF REPLY CONSUME BANDWIDTH!!!1 LOL SELF REPLY CONSUME BANDWIDTH!!!1 LOL SELF REPLY CONSUME BANDWIDTH!!!1 LOL SELF REPLY CONSUME BANDWIDTH!!!1 LOL SELF REPLY CONSUME BANDWIDTH!!!1 LOL SELF REPLY CONSUME BANDWIDTH!!!1 LOL SELF REPLY CONSUME BANDWIDTH!!!1 LOL SELF REPLY CONSUME BANDWIDTH!!!1 LOL SELF REPLY CONSUME BANDWIDTH!!!1 LOL SELF REPLY CONSUME BANDWIDTH!!!1 LOL SELF REPLY CONSUME BANDWIDT
(0)
Don't steal my sh*t.
June 1st, 2007
(0)
I'm on it already.
June 1st, 2007
(0)
Very well then, my sites weren't at all good anyway..
(2)
how are the sites that are low rated and getting no views ever taking up bandwidth?
June 1st, 2007
(0)
what if you only have ONE ytmnd?!
June 1st, 2007
(0)
If YTMND gets bad enough, perhaps we should have a YTMND Rapture, where the best of the best YTMNDers are given the right to permanently post sites, while everyone else is given a limited account. They can view sites for free, but they can only have their sites posted for a week for free unless they pay for keeping it up longer, or if it gets a >4 average. After that point, they can only look at it themselves in their account page.
June 1st, 2007
(0)
hah
June 1st, 2007
(0)
fived for MOTHER F*CKING GARBAGE DAY GAARRRBBAAAGGEE DAYYYY
June 1st, 2007
(0)
officially i dont think max is allowed to make money from this site. i believe it must appear to be not for profit since its a parody site and most of the sites use (in some form or another) other people copyrighted sh*t.
June 1st, 2007
(0)
omg max is going out without his vodka! on my way~!
June 1st, 2007
(1)
Oh I forgot to 1 it
June 1st, 2007
(1)
this should be the first to go
June 1st, 2007
(0)
elvira.ytmnd.com is no more.
June 1st, 2007
(0)
anything less than a 4 for this guy^
June 4th, 2007
(0)
no elvira = sad day for ytmnd.
June 1st, 2007
(0)
6/6. My birthday. I got a couple sites I could can.
June 1st, 2007
(0)
i don't have many sites to delete. But i'll get a few of them (there are some sh*tty ones.)
June 1st, 2007
(0)
ill do it, i got some pretty sh*tty sites haha
June 1st, 2007
(0)
Good thing I have no sites
June 1st, 2007
(0)
You should start with this one.
June 1st, 2007
(1)
How will deleting least viewed sites save bandwidth? Surely the most viewed sites use more bandwidth. On a related issue deleted sites don't even save disk space, assets with 0 sites using them are still available.
June 1st, 2007
(0)
Shut the f*ck up nerd
June 1st, 2007
(1)
Penis
June 1st, 2007
(0)
Disk Usage != Bandwidth
June 1st, 2007
(0)
Have you guys seen Fourest around?
June 1st, 2007
(0)
jk♥
June 1st, 2007
(0)
Adverb had the same idea last year. http://dyp.ytmnd.com/
June 1st, 2007
(0)
We need more Garbage Day, also I support your idea
(0)
delete anything under like a 2.5
June 1st, 2007
(0)
Can we get rid of HTPAT instead?
June 4th, 2007
(0)
Garbage day is a very dangerous day.