Jokerkaaos' recent comments:

September 20th, 2006
Good technical work, but it went nowhere.
September 20th, 2006
F*cking Upham...
September 16th, 2006
Edit - better image fit
September 16th, 2006
lmao. Win.
September 16th, 2006
On on the site ?Wololo!
zippyjon - "You should def put in the heiyoyoyu though, though for now, 5'd. " Haha... I tried! I cannot find that sound file anywhere. I might have to dig out and reinstall the game just to get it.
September 15th, 2006
On on the site ?
BaftA: "that episode made me shed a tear." Me too.
September 15th, 2006
On on the site ?PETA has one weakness
+10 for anti-PETA. +10 for dead Canada Geese (those things are nothing but giant flying rats - they sh*t all over the place). -15 'cause 5 is all I can give you.
September 15th, 2006
and now banner ads on sites themselves for people who aren't signed in. Fail.
September 13th, 2006
5 for stencil creation alone.
September 13th, 2006
On on the site ?because i got high
lol, bowl hole.
September 13th, 2006
!!!!
September 13th, 2006
On on the site ?Thetans Come Back!
"Thetan" is actually pronounced with a long A sound, and the comedy value is pretty meh, but you get 4 just for mocking $cientology.
September 13th, 2006
Meh. Lot of better audio choices for this, I think.
September 13th, 2006
fav'd for Carl alone.
September 13th, 2006
LOL... image needs work, but 5'd for audio work, cowbell, roxbury, walken, and general rofl factor.
September 13th, 2006
lol
September 13th, 2006
On on the site ?Frozen Dairy Jihad
5'd for offending mystics.
September 13th, 2006
lol, tongue weighs as much as an elephant.
September 13th, 2006
cool graphics, but not much entertainment.
September 13th, 2006
Hmmm... I think the border actually adds to the effect. Ah, well.
September 13th, 2006
-1 for enya, -1 for making me remember the stress of minesweeper! +2 for all that work. LOL... good job.
September 13th, 2006
lol, stoned employees.
September 13th, 2006
cooke - I gave you a 5 and a 4 on two of your Walken sites, even after you 1'd this. I also gave you a couple 2's and a couple 3's. I was just checking over your stuff - not avenging. I thought you were downvoting my site for no good reason, yes, but that's your right. I try to be fair, and I am aware that votes are documented. I tend to vote high or low (especially on things I think are under-rated or over-rated) and ignore stuff I think is just mediocre, and my average vote is still 2.32 - almost dead in the middle. I'll stand by that.
September 13th, 2006
cooke: "it moves, without a doubt" me: "............"
September 13th, 2006
If you look at the link in the description, you'll see it explained thus by the creator: "This animated gif was made with the method developed by William T. Freeman, Edward H. Adelson, and David J. Heeger at the Media Laboratory of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and published in Volume 25, of SIGGRAPH '91 Conference Proceedings. It uses "a quadrature pair of oriented filters to vary the local phase, giving the sensation of motion". I tested this method, by writing a C++ program to apply filters to an image in such a way that it's upper left part (above the diagoval) appears to move right and upward, and lower right part appears to move in the opposite direction, which is just right for the picture of M. C. Escher "Drawing Hands":"
September 13th, 2006
I'll explain further - first of all, there is no actual "movement" in animation - it's all just still frames that give illusion of "movement." That's part of the artistic statement that's lost on some folks. Next, even in conventional animation terms, this image is NOT moving. It's a trick of virtual "light."
September 13th, 2006
"There is movement, though. If you look at the diagonal line going from the top right of the picture to the bottom left you can see that. YOU FAIL/LIE!" ---lol, people are dumb.
September 13th, 2006
Upon further review, I come to appreciate the weaving of excitebike into the 80s motif of the movie. This + image flip for NES realism + improved physics elevates you from 5 to fav. Victory.
September 13th, 2006
I don't understand why people object to sponsoring your own site. I think that's part of why Max instituted it. People donate to YTMND and their site gets seen a little more. Max still wins. That being said, this site is weak. +3 to make up for sponsorship nazi downvotes. ;p