Asking "why?" is the wrong question. The truth is, there is no "why." The only question you should be asking is "how?" because that's the question that actually gets you somewhere instead of making up imaginary friends to explain away all of the things you don't understand.
3. By bringing up ID (in an argument completely NOT about the existance of god(s)) you show me that you are not a so called "agnostic" because ID implies an "intelligent designer." I.E. Someone or something supernatural that "designed" the universe. That can only be a GOD... Therefore you are a theist. 4. Where are these "numbers" you speak of? Are they ones that you made up? 4. YOUR VERY DEFINITION of agnostic proves my point! Go ahead and actually read what you copied and pasted into here!
And you've just completely failed. Evolution isn't random chance. 1. By stating that you think it is, you obviously don't understand natural selection and need to retake 6th grade biology. In nature, nothing is random. 2. Mistaking abiogenesis (how life began) with evolution (how life evolves) further points out your ignorance. Please educate yourself because you're fractally wrong. At every possible resolution of your argument, you are wrong.
Thus, I am an agnostic atheist. I do not know if there is a god or not, but I live my life under the assumption that there isn't because I have not been presented with sufficient evidence to believe in any particular god or gods.
Oh boy, another "fence sitter." Since you seem to have a problem with definitions, here you go. One who doesn't believe in gods is an atheist. One who believes in a god or gods is a theist. One who doesn't know if there is a god or not is an agnostic. One who knows that there is or is not a god is said to be gnostic. Since no one can claim, with irrefutable certainty, that there is a god or are gods, then one can only be agnostic. However, belief and knowledge are two different and distinct things.
Mephistopheles' recent comments: