What the hell people, he just put a Carl Sagan quote. What little he did create was poorly done and at odds with the same quote you find so great. Don't five it just because he is on your side of the argument, thats just as bad as spamming money to get it on the top sponsored list. It seems on this website the religious have the money, while the anti-religious have the numbers. You ask them not to abuse the resource they have, and so you too should heed this advice.
once again requires mountains of evidence when you provide none. In fact scientists have created the basic building blocks of life from chemical "stews", putting them about 1 step away from creating life from non life...
-4'd for the following objections. 1) Your first premise is everything has a sufficient cause, therefore what is the sufficient cause of the existence of the first cause. If you say that is a moot point, then there is no reason to assume that the universe itself had to have a cause, and thus could have caused itself. 2) You assert that intelligence cannot come from non intelligence, which needs mountains of proof, and you provide none. 3) You assert that life cannot come from non-life, which ....
You misspelled Kerry, you somehow thought it was a good idea to have a huge mouse pointer with lines from the page that followed it, and the f*cking sound wasn't intelligible.
NarcoticHobo's recent comments: