derpallardie's profile

April 3rd, 2008
February 14th, 2012
Made Average Rating
22 1.00
Total Created Average Score
0 (0.00) 
Made Received
$0.00 $0.00

recent activity

when activity
February 14th, 2012 derpallardie viewed ?okokok.
January 29th, 2012 derpallardie viewed ?THE ANCIENT DANCE OF THE EICHMAN's profile.
January 29th, 2012 derpallardie added ?THE ANCIENT DANCE OF THE EICHMAN to their favorites list.
January 29th, 2012 derpallardie viewed ?THE ANCIENT DANCE OF THE EICHMAN.

most recent sites

title views votes rating creation
derpallardie has no sites ( ._.)

highest rated sites

title views votes rating creation
derpallardie has no sites ( ._.)

recent comments

October 6th, 2009
On on the site ?That's disrespectful
5 for the maryland hat. Terps!
February 22nd, 2009
On on the site ?ARNOLD RAVE!
Deacon/Roche did it better- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P81dHaZiyA8
October 11th, 2008
the moment i heard her, i knew she was something special; a radio personality that speaks only in death rattles.
September 13th, 2008
the8ball: So are Obama's credentials, but the stupid Democrats put him FIRST on the ticket. Methinks they should've rethought that one. Nice straw man. Obama has identical experience to that of Lincoln in 1860. Given the competition, though, not voting with Bush 95% of the time might be the only credential he needs.
September 13th, 2008
the8ball: Unless you have 50% + 1 vote, you don't win jack sh*t. By this logic W was not elected in 2000. Clinton was not elected in 92 or 96. Nixon was not elected in 68. I can go on. '50% +1 vote' is meaningless given third parties run for office. Example: New Mexico, 2000. Bush and Gore both won 48% of the vote, with the edge in total votes going to Gore. 4% of the vote was for other candidates. Gore, having the most votes, won New Mexico's 5 electoral votes.