umopepisdn's recent comments:

umopepisdn
July 31st, 2006
1:24:08 PM CDT
On on the site ?YTMND - The Soundtrack (*VOLUME TWELVE*)
(0)
[0 replies]
5 for Ashlee!
umopepisdn
May 21st, 2006
12:37:25 PM CDT
On on the site ?Ashlee Simpson only had ONE weakness...
(0)
[0 replies]
Mean.
umopepisdn
May 7th, 2006
11:54:04 PM CDT
On on the site ?The many lols of YTMND
(0)
[0 replies]
Ashlee/5
umopepisdn
April 25th, 2006
12:53:47 AM CDT
On on the site ?Ashlee Simpson's Nipple Slip
(0)
[0 replies]
Ashlee/5
umopepisdn
April 15th, 2006
12:53:41 AM CDT
On on the site ?Fatcat's Loop Project (Update)
(0)
[0 replies]
Ashlee/5
umopepisdn
April 12th, 2006
7:34:23 AM CDT
On on the site ?L-O-V-E
(0)
[0 replies]
Ashlee/5
umopepisdn
January 10th, 2006
1:58:42 AM CST
On on the site ?ASHLEE SIMPSON LOLOLOLOL
(0)
[0 replies]
Yes.
umopepisdn
November 21st, 2005
7:31:41 AM CST
On on the site ?Dear Jessie...
(0)
[0 replies]
JOHN STAMOS AND ROLLERGIRL = 5
umopepisdn
November 17th, 2005
9:38:05 PM CST
On on the site ?Ridin' Wiggum
(0)
[0 replies]
k
umopepisdn
November 17th, 2005
7:53:25 PM CST
On on the site ?Ridin' Wiggum
(0)
[0 replies]
I DOWNVOTED YOURS BECAUSE "DUCK" ISN'T PITCH-SYNCHED WITH THE BACKGROUND. ALSO FOR TILING AND NOT USING IMAGE TEXT, THEREFORE LAGGING MANY PCS. ALSO BECAUSE YOU CRIED ABOUT IT. ROFL FAIL. ALSO COCKS.
umopepisdn
November 16th, 2005
1:55:46 PM CST
On on the site ?Ridin' Wiggum
(0)
[0 replies]
LOOL RAGED INTERNET = SERIOUS BUSINESS ALSO MY LOOP = BETTER
umopepisdn
October 10th, 2005
8:47:10 PM CDT
On on the site ?Dumbledore had only one weakness
(0)
[0 replies]
It's been done. http://snapecapeddumbledore.ytmnd.com/
umopepisdn
October 7th, 2005
12:19:18 PM CDT
On on the site ?
(0)
[0 replies]
Blümchen - Heut Ist Mein Tag
umopepisdn
September 30th, 2005
9:09:51 AM CDT
On on the site ?Killer7 Brian Peppers-Smith
(0)
[0 replies]
Would be better with Con, but 5/5.
umopepisdn
September 12th, 2005
12:19:38 AM CDT
On on the site ?BatPeppers: ualuealuealeuale
(0)
[0 replies]
We had such a fun time with the indian.
umopepisdn
August 20th, 2005
9:19:32 PM CDT
On on the site ?Nintendogs is AWESOME!
(0)
[0 replies]
5'ed for Super Mario RPG.
umopepisdn
August 9th, 2005
2:52:31 PM CDT
On on the site ?(nsfw) A Sex Bomb of Epic Proportions
(0)
[0 replies]
Usually I downvote when my loops are stolen...but Tom Jones rocks too much. :-)
umopepisdn
August 3rd, 2005
2:48:10 AM CDT
On on the site ?Little Mac vs. Blanka (Refresh for sync)
(0)
[0 replies]
Needs to be top ten.
umopepisdn
August 2nd, 2005
4:47:48 AM CDT
On on the site ?Check the Penis
(0)
[0 replies]
It's been done.
umopepisdn
August 2nd, 2005
4:13:51 AM CDT
On on the site ?ZOMG! It's our old pal, Pedobear!
(0)
[0 replies]
+50 for the song.
umopepisdn
August 1st, 2005
1:53:39 AM CDT
On on the site ?OMFGWOWBOT
(0)
[0 replies]
I remember that icon...I think that might be a fishing bot.
umopepisdn
July 29th, 2005
8:15:07 AM CDT
On on the site ?Grievous Rave!
(0)
[0 replies]
5/5 For using good music instead of stupidoverusedannoyingJPOPsupersynth.wav.
umopepisdn
July 22nd, 2005
11:26:11 PM CDT
On on the site ?A jelly donut?!?
(0)
[0 replies]
Would have been a perfect "first-generation" YTMND. Still 5/5.
umopepisdn
July 22nd, 2005
8:14:54 AM CDT
On on the site ?Happy Birthday, Karen
(0)
[0 replies]
Would hit it 5/5. ...nudies please...
umopepisdn
July 19th, 2005
2:49:39 AM CDT
On on the site ?I love bell peppers!
(1)
[0 replies]
Top five material.
umopepisdn
July 15th, 2005
11:15:30 PM CDT
On on the site ?(nsfw) nigga got mortal kombat'd for my bike update 3 (refresh)
(0)
[0 replies]
My waffle got roffled.
umopepisdn
July 15th, 2005
8:15:09 AM CDT
On on the site ?Link finds material
(0)
[0 replies]
A+++ For April 2002 with Miss Heather Carolin.
umopepisdn
July 15th, 2005
1:52:04 AM CDT
On on the site ?Link finds.. an E Rave!
(0)
[0 replies]
10/5
umopepisdn
July 14th, 2005
9:20:56 AM CDT
On on the site ?Link Finds Himself (refresh)
(0)
[0 replies]
Clever.
umopepisdn
July 14th, 2005
2:22:08 AM CDT
On on the site ?Link finds a brand new..... GAY FUEL (refresh)
(0)
[0 replies]
What was the point in remaking that?