?The Truth of YTMND |
boozer |
(3.11) |
177,424 |
2004-10-16 |
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
I like how you attempt to make yourself look as though you're some sort of intellectual, yet have simple mistakes throughout the entire unimpressive utterance. This just makes you look like those inbred seventeen year olds you claim to be so much better
|
?Metal Gear Solid - Saving, please wait... Do not re... |
jdigital |
(3.62) |
21,901 |
2004-07-22 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
I forgot how bad the dialogue could get, f*cking pretentious pseudo-intellectual babble.
|
?The Truth of YTMND |
boozer |
(3.11) |
177,424 |
2004-10-16 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
the whole f*cking point. As far as intellectual, you can consider me Stephen "f*cking" Hawking in comparison to your drivel. Have a nice day. ;)
|
?(nsfw) odysseus |
Godzilla |
(3.84) |
11,394 |
2005-06-03 |
comment by:
rating given:
(3.00)
comment:
+2 for intellectual humor
|
?MADDOX - THE GAME |
KainXiorcal |
(4.24) |
347,003 |
2005-06-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
O noes! Are you telling me our highly intellectual YTMND discussions are going to be dumbed down?!?!
|
?DUMBLEDORES DEAD - How to ruin a Harry Pot... |
Jerkass |
(3.44) |
27,705 |
2005-07-17 |
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
Although I hate Wikipedian psudo-intellectuals, this fails. Hack Wiki, erase their databases, and post goatse all over it and then you can calling it "owning".
|
?Harry Potter Ruined for a Little Girl |
SubwayArbys |
(3.95) |
119,172 |
2005-07-19 |
comment by:
rating given:
(3.00)
comment:
ahh the intellectual ingenuity of the wise gentlemen who frequent the 'halo2sucks' internet bulletin board posting forum thread BBS database system boards.
|
?Picard Song |
ShittyMcShit |
(4.56) |
4,709,288 |
2004-04-25 |
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
STOLEN!!! Does no one care about stealing intellectual property? http://tborgax.homepage.dk/audio.html
|
?MadWorld |
MaTtErHoRn |
(2.50) |
1,056 |
2005-08-11 |
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
Donnie Darko was awful. Nothing more than a teen flick disguised as some pseudo-intellectual, deep, emotional bullsh*t. f*ck you, and f*ck your 15 year old fanbase.
-F
|
?Racism is unfair! |
TheJMaqExperience |
(3.65) |
4,368 |
2005-09-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
5 for making an intellectual ytmnd. also a note i want to ADD. it's not that Ricans get shafted it's that Ricans can look like any other race, and unless they tell you they are Rican you can't be sure. that uncertainty has curtailed the development of
|
?Peewee is Ridin' Spinnaz |
Doitle |
(4.14) |
133,193 |
2005-10-12 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
I am sorry Bioman. I didn't know you had made this already... Someone sent me the gif and I was like !!! That is a Ridin' Spinnaz ytmnd! So again sorry for sorta, unknowing intellectual theft.
|
?The Truth of YTMND |
boozer |
(3.11) |
177,424 |
2004-10-16 |
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
Not deserving of the top 15, by far. Pretty stupid, if you ask me. As pointed out before, writing is aimed at sounding intellectual but is full of stupid little mistakes. Not to mention it's just a bad YTMND. I mean, don't get me wrong. I hate douc
|
?General Grievous Gives it His All |
Conspirate |
(1.89) |
1,570 |
2005-11-20 |
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
Tsk. Namecalling. Such a heavyweight intellectual activity XD Relax buddy I'm just ribbing ya. Canon is like... official storyline by lucasfilm as opposed to fanfic. And yea grievous is funny, esp if you see the 'snidely grievous' ytmnd's.
|
?Myspace Suicide (Original/Unedited) |
cobalt |
(3.55) |
572,841 |
2005-12-01 |
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
master I will agree with you on a purely intellectual level... on an emotional level I absolutely disagree with you and enough4... anyway.. this was a tragedy whichever way you look at it, I wish the people truly affected by this all the best. Goodnight
|
|
?Picard Ends inkdrinker |
MasterSitsu |
(4.02) |
12,146 |
2006-01-03 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Yeah. I'll be letting someone who says "more smarter" call me a pseudo-intellectual.
|
?eBaum doesn't change by stealing our facial ... |
KCCool |
(4.13) |
79,909 |
2006-01-06 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
I went to thier forums and wrote a post about intellectual copyright and Fair Use. I got banned for 'reason: spammer'
|
?rocky joins the raid! |
ihateapples |
(2.85) |
2,357 |
2006-01-08 |
comment by:
rating given:
(2.00)
comment:
intellectual theft.
matmnd.ytmnd.com
|
and the complaints come marching in |
max |
|
0 |
2006-01-08 |
comment by:
comment:
Call me unimpressed. Ebaums has had more REAL users on before than were on for that raid. I'm all for destroying ebaums, but because it sucks, not over some intellectual property "YOU STOLE MY INTERNET JOKE" bullsh*t. Do we really need to create a vigilante RIAA that cares about stupid animated gifs? Destroy it 'cause it's boring - not for any other reason.
|
?I created Lindsay Lohan doesn't change facia... |
SpliceVW |
(4.23) |
141,644 |
2006-01-08 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
It doesn't matter if he used the pictures, it's a parody and there's a big difference between fair use and intellectual property theft...
|
and the complaints come marching in |
max |
|
0 |
2006-01-08 |
comment by:
comment:
Now one of these days, Ebaum is going to steal from the wrong site, they're gonna sue him for a insanely large ammount and shut him down. If the FBI/FCC don't catch him first. They're beginning to take intellectual property (the ideas and original thought of the others) seriously and it's only a matter of time before the law catches up with him.
Alternatively, a class-action lawsuit by all those who have had material/property stolen from them could also shut down Ebaums, especially if they want to try to get him to repay by charging daily use in the past for items used starting from the date in which the original request to remove was started OR if the artist was only recently alerted since the time it was posted.
So before anymore of you Ebaum fanboys attempt to drop the lame "he only hosts" crap you now have officially been out argued by someone who can string more than swear words and other low level vocabulary by a man who can actually process large words.
|
and the complaints come marching in |
max |
|
0 |
2006-01-08 |
comment by:
comment:
In the vast history of the Internet, Ebaums is just another senile hiccup. Don't waste your time with them. Heed Max. Enjoy YTMND and gloat over these pathetic thieves. We have the goods. Let Ebaums putrify in their own waste products. The fact that they steal from us shows their utter moral and intellectual poverty. They'll end up in the same place as the Pets.com sock puppet! Max can buy Eric's sorry *ss at the bankruptcy sale.
|
"Cease and Desist" from Neil Bauman |
max |
|
0 |
2006-01-10 |
comment by:
comment:
Max totally owned Eric. Eric wasn't expecting an intellectual reply, LOL!
|
?More eForums Fun |
MuckRaker |
(4.19) |
34,677 |
2006-01-11 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
What do people even talk about on the ebaum forums? It must be an intellectual septic tank.
|
"Cease and Desist" from Neil Bauman |
max |
|
0 |
2006-01-10 |
comment by:
comment:
Oh, and as much as i supported people sending e-mails to the ebaum's host reporting theft of intellectual property, trespassing IS taking it way too far.
|
"Cease and Desist" from Neil Bauman |
max |
|
0 |
2006-01-10 |
comment by:
comment:
MAX IS GOD! A team of intellectuals, lawyers and script writers could not have written a better reply. I'm looking forward to reading the response from the "executive vice president".
|
"Cease and Desist" from Neil Bauman |
max |
|
0 |
2006-01-10 |
comment by:
comment:
Since he's so intellectual, he'd know that the academic community doesn't allow plaigarism of any kind, even from online sources. The penalties in post secondary for this are very severe and can result in expulsion (or worse, they'll eat your first born child). I guess he need not worry about intellectual things...LOL (sic), not to mention the fact that he was totally and completely owned by YTMND and Max.
|
?--= YTMND PSA (please read) |
W00TERZ |
(3.53) |
2,845 |
2006-01-11 |
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
Or you could stop worrying about intellectual property. If you want to hate ebaums, hate it because it sucks, not over some ownership sh*t.
|
and then |
max |
|
0 |
2006-01-11 |
comment by:
comment:
You're seriously going to go the "intellectual property" route here? Ugh.
|
and then |
max |
|
0 |
2006-01-11 |
comment by:
comment:
Who's to say the ebaums rip wasn't parody? I mean, it clearly wasn't because they're too dumb to get satire, but the very notion of claiming intellectual property of them when it's assembled of pictures whose individual copyrights weren't cleared? It's retarded. Do you really think the site owner got the go-ahead from Rolling Stone to use any of the images from their shoot of Lohan? Trying to prevent the free exchange of ideas is a stupid, slippery slope.
|
hah |
max |
|
0 |
2006-01-12 |
comment by:
comment:
The funny part is that you guys defended the "copyright" of a guy who made his picture by stealing from magazines and photographers. If you defend copyright, you're opening the floodgates to destroying almost all the cool sh*t on the internet. Do you really think we'd survive a lawsuit for the trillion Mario sites? For the use of the Muhammad Hassan theme? For sampling ANY musician with deep pockets? For running whole scenes of Family Guy? Find a better reason to hate ebaums (there are plenty) and quit being hypocrites on this intellectual property sh*t.
|