YTMND Search

 (3.00)

lol. -2 for resembling those stupid pseudo-intellectual sites

 (0.00)

you just called a site about giraffes taking over the world "pseudo-intellectual". you need a dictionary, stat

 (5.00)

Yeah giraffe world domination theories are purely intellectual.

 (5.00)

Using '-ous' words looks intellectual, it really does.

 (5.00)

there are many more, which are as good, if not better, but Harry Potter books are about as intellectually informative as TV, particularly in America, where they changed the name of the first book to pacify the retards who couldn't possibly bother to look up the Philosopher's Stone or anything to do with alchemy, the 'scientific' answer to witchcraft.

 (5.00)

I'm sure that these people saying that the Harry Potter books suck because they aren't intellectual have never once watched a non-intellectual movie/tv show or listened to music that didn't intellectually challenge them, or done anything at all purely for enjoyment and without any significant intellectual gain.

 (1.00)

an intellectual ytmnd

 (2.00)

This is not a good site. Unfortunately, you can expect a lot of fives from "intellectuals". (Extra star because he didn't like the Catholics, which my family is)

 (5.00)

Oooh, I feel all intellectual, like I've just watched Frasier. Hey baby, I hear the blues a-callin'. Tossed salad and scrambled eggs!

 (5.00)

lol @ idiots that can't grasp the intellectual concepts within the content of this YTMND

 (1.00)

Whats gayer than WoW? Acheron's Call 2... *cough* I mean LOTRO... I can't wait for turbine to go out of business so a real game company can make a good game with that intellectual property

 (5.00)

5'd because of all the self-styled intellectuals who think they understand society, and all the idiots who take anything on this site seriously.

 (5.00)

Funny but overrated, just random f*cking words on random f*cking pictures, hurray for intellectualism.

 (2.00)

Oh and after enslavement by the Egyptians and Romans. And after being beaten and jailed by the British after the Holocaust. And when books like The Protocols of the Elders of Zion (look it up) become one of the most widely read books in history. And when neo-Naziism is gaining strength even (and especially) in the US. And when the dime-a-dozen pseudo-intellectuals and bought-out university chairs around the world believe the only Jewish state to be one of oppression and concentrated evil. So, oops.

 (5.00)

proclaming the untold mysteries contained within which were only revealed to their brilliantly creative minds. lol, intellectual arteests

Look, posting spoilers to a book which isn't even out yet is inappropriate, sorry. Those spoilers are a violation of the intellectual property rights of the author and the publisher, property rights YTMND claims to respect. You could always do the right thing and take down the spoilers, that's all they want really, and I agree with them. No one wants a protracted legal battle, especially when you know you're wrong.

How is it a violation of intellectual property rights? For that to be he would have to benefit monetarily from it. He would either have to pawn the book ideas off as his own and try to sell them or take the spoilers and charge people to see them. Since YTMND is non profit you can't argue that he is trying to make money off it. Where is the violation? You would have to prove he sought to make money off of this which you cannot. Their legal notices are all bluster and no substance.

Mmm, no. Claiming a book as your own is plagiarism, a uniquely different issue which is a violation of academic discipline, not Federal law. You don't go to jail for plagiarism, simply discredited. However, a violation of intellectual property rights does not require proft. If that were so software licensing agreements would be unconscionable, because you aren't neccessarily profiting from an illegal copy of Photoshop. The bottom line is this is an actionable tort, and I'm behind the publisher.

 (1.00)

lol @ all the pseudo-intellectuals still fiving this

 (1.00)

also, YTMND was not made for this sh*t. funny,amazing,intellectual,tits,ghey or GTFO.

 (5.00)

Simply the fact that Korf says he hasn't yet seen this movie is a testament to his lameness. He was probably too busy reviewing art flicks that nobody with any amount of taste or sense would actually like so that he could debate the inferences of the director with 40-something hipsters at Starbucks and give himself a feeling of intellectual superiority. But don't mind me. I'm in a sh*tty mood today because I feel like crap. Great ytmnd.

 (0.00)

They're not even in the same key, you jackhole. Nice attempt at pseudo intellectualism though.

 (0.00)

i like this line of comments, it's empirical proof that there are ytmnd'ers who actually know how to think and debate intellectually...anyway, all i want to say is that i think art is relative. everyone obviously has their own personal definition of 'art.' in my opinion, in the most general terms, art is some product intended to stimulate mind and senses, made with some sort of human creativity. the more a person relates to or feels stimulated by the 'artwork' the more quality it possesses for them.

 (0.00)

That means YTMND must be the same except 8 year olds without pretending to be intellectual

 (5.00)

Thats why the Intellectual underground is 9000 times better. Def Jux *

 (4.00)

lol, an intellectual

 (0.00)

Product placement. Although as a filmmaker -- one who creates art that is usually considered the intellectual property of its creator -- he may indeed have the same opinion of eBaum's.

 (5.00)

This rendition of the anthem makes me nostalgic for borscht, for Siberian gulags that serve stale borscht, and for Siberian gulags that serve stale borscht and then disappear Jews, intellectuals, industrialists and agitators. I miss those days.

 (1.00)

my favorite YTMNDs are the one's not designed to evoke any form of emotional or intellectual reaction, but just flatly state a state of affairs.

 (5.00)

No he made intellectual jokes designed to provoke thought in his audience. In fact he made a near verbatim reference to what you said in many of his jokes. "I didn't come to a comedy club to think." "Oh yeah then where do you go to think?" To say he made observational humor is a ric*ckulous understatement.