hah |
max |
|
0 |
2006-01-12 |
comment by:
comment:
UncleHams is quite pleased. I also enjoyed having a chat in erics sh*ty chat room. so many queers in there, I almost turned gay reading all of it. YTMND for life. Long live these other sites who support YTMND.
|
?4chan fails at helping |
mokona7 |
(3.70) |
11,449 |
2005-11-08 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Wanna know something funny? All I know is that it's from some hentai game, but I can't help you from there. My apologies.
|
?(nsfw) Emo fag in denial, *update* HES STILL DEN... |
thomasaquinas |
(3.59) |
65,537 |
2005-11-24 |
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
@drewbacca: Yeah. Avenged Sevenfold. That's right up there with Metallica. Dumbass.
And the rest of you: why is this funny? I mean at all? I just don't get it.
|
?Somewhere Over YTMND Rainbow |
bartoron |
(2.43) |
1,460 |
2005-12-27 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
what is love is all ready in there
|
?ytmnd pwns jeopardy (better GIF and MP3, so refr... |
ABACABB |
(4.47) |
427,432 |
2006-01-12 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Ok, this supports my theory that there is a huge underground YTMND fad with wealthy celebs. They all do it stuff like this to get on the site.
|
"Cease and Desist" from Neil Bauman |
max |
|
0 |
2006-01-10 |
comment by:
comment:
...racial slurs, and completely get away with it, thinking that there will never be retaliation. False. He also thinks very lowly of the YTMND community, which I suppose is his right, but saying that we are all loser kids who never leave our computers is kind of a dangerous assumption to make. While I have no lawyers, I DO have my bachelors of science and -- surprise -- I DO leave my computer; I'd be up for debate with this anti-semetic a$$ anytime. Perhaps Bauman is completely miffed by the fact that the people who contribute to this website actually put time and effort into what they do, and a young man who manages this site as a hobby is LAPPING a man who tries to make his two-bit website into a company in popularity. Maybe he'd leave you alone, Max, if he had something to do, such as actually update his site and answer emails...or maybe take an English class, or 5. In conclusion, I think you're handling this very well, and try not to let that man get to you. He has very little on you.
|
?YTMND.co.jp |
LifeInGreen |
(4.57) |
578,570 |
2006-01-12 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Wow. That is really weird that I recognise all those characters. And somehow I think an Outlaw Star would work in there somewhere. Just cause I remember that on old Toonami. ;_;
|
?(nsfw) In God we Trust |
DaRuckus |
(3.44) |
3,723 |
2006-01-16 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
that isnt funny at all. Why is there a picture of that?
|
?There WAS hope for Nickelodeon Studios (resized... |
relam13 |
(4.03) |
51,157 |
2006-01-15 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
Dude, you know all that's gonna be in there is a power-crunch that tastes like a number 1 hit jam.
|
latest news and massive todo list. |
max |
|
0 |
2006-01-16 |
comment by:
comment:
Max, I've been coming to YTMND since they were individual sites with seperate domain names. I personally think the paid users idea is good, but for the love of God don't make it a recurring payment. It's the one thing that stops me from signing up for almost anything. I don't want the extra hassle. One thing you might consider, for paid users, is the ability to choose between the corner image and the ! # system that we all loved so much. (Globally, not just for their sites.) I'd also like to see a loader for those sites that always have "Refresh" in their titles. I have absolutely no idea how you would implement this as I don't know if there are any calls you can make from within the browser to get loading status data but it's a thought. Here's another one I just thought of: Make SURE that people are required to type in their image and sound origins before the site creation system will allow them to submit. That's about all for me.
|
latest news and massive todo list. |
max |
|
0 |
2006-01-16 |
comment by:
comment:
Auto-site deletion is a very bad idea, because it takes all of the fun out of the variety of sites. Who would make an original YTMND if they knew that there was a good chance it would be deleted in 30 days anyway?
Also, I think making recurring payments will attract very, very few people. It would be better just to attract more advertising and have one-time payments.
|
?Katamari HIV |
Yzzerdd |
(4.35) |
34,327 |
2006-01-07 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
This is one of the best YTMND's of all time. It's up there with 'United States of Barrel Roll' and 'Vader Coaster'. Yeah, I'm old school.
|
latest news and massive todo list. |
max |
|
0 |
2006-01-16 |
comment by:
comment:
Don't mess with perfection, man. I understand YTMND needs money to keep it up and running, and I understand that. But the moderation queue is gonna kill the community. Trust me, i've seen it happen; admins getting pissed off at spam and such, then implimenting a queue, and each forum went straight to hell. Don't do it, max. And don't baleet sites under 2.5. All that would be left would be fads! Ick! I also understand that YTMND needs a limit to the number of them, so how about baleeting sites under 1? There's a lot of them, and people don't watch them. Don't kill the community, O King of the Intarweb!
|
latest news and massive todo list. |
max |
|
0 |
2006-01-16 |
comment by:
comment:
ZOMG max!!! someone way up there said "YTMND hoodie" ! ... I second that! Please look into it after all this is done. I bought the shirt but now it is winter.
|
|
To-do updates and discussion. |
max |
|
0 |
2006-01-17 |
comment by:
comment:
Except.. now that I look at my recent votes.. I see I have voted all ones and fives. There are a couple of reasons why. One is that I often don't bother voting on pages I don't understand. Just because I don't get it doesn't mean it isn't good. I will also vote 5 to counter downvotes on a site I think deserves a better rating.
|
To-do updates and discussion. |
max |
|
0 |
2006-01-17 |
comment by:
comment:
AmonPaaradul, sure, it's all subjective, but not to the point of total equality and loss of all value judgments. To use an example I used before, the vast majority of people still think Mozart is a better composer than anyone in A Simple Plan. Sure, there's going to be some dissent, but who's it coming from? Is a 12-year-old girl the best authority? Is "Because the singer's so hot" a respectable argument? There's always room for differing opinions, but it doesn't mean that some opinions aren't strictly for retards.
|
?HIDDEN ETCH-A-SKETCH MESSAGE (refresh) ... |
Nox |
(2.35) |
35,750 |
2006-01-18 |
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
why is there an etch a sketch at all?
|
?Gamefaq Suicide |
wtfomg |
(3.38) |
3,999 |
2006-01-18 |
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
Yet again another one of these. With all the news articles lately this is just salt in the wounds. more communities know about mitchell now and so there are even more people sympathetic to his pain. I'm sick of dseeing these....
|
To-do updates and discussion. |
max |
|
0 |
2006-01-17 |
comment by:
comment:
tehpwner: "they're upset that someone told
them the truth about their site." - oh screw you and your 'truth', with people like me you've put a grudge in your head that isnt there and just 1 everything in site. inkdrinker is honest, you're not. you get off on being the one everyone hates and its just sad. i dont hate you, i just think you're pathetic, and the reason you dont make sites is because, unlike inkdrinker, you probably couldnt make a good one if you tried. if you gave a crap about ytmnd you'd make one despite getting it downvoted to hell... you can make fun of Chav-Slayer all you want but theres a reason you had your account deleted.
|
To-do updates and discussion. |
max |
|
0 |
2006-01-17 |
comment by:
comment:
actually, yes you did, before your last account got banned... i remember it well "took me forever to 1 all yoru sites"... took a look at your recent vote history, and surely enough, you did... anyways - the point is, and let me make it clear, is that if you honestly think something sucks, fine - but unlike adverb or inky, i dont believe you - you just downvote to get off. if there were less people downvoting for fun like you, other people might be more honest about their votes. instead, people like me are more generous because we know there are too many people like you out there.
|
To-do updates and discussion. |
max |
|
0 |
2006-01-17 |
comment by:
comment:
This is like me vs. syncan - comments like a couple weeks ago. I don't think it's possible for anyone to vote with 100% neutrality, but I'm going to have to point out that pwner has voted sites higher than 1 that aren't part of the "jocks club." Does he hold grudges? There's no way for me to know. But he does occasionally boost things that aren't by me or my fellow iconoclastic hate-sponges. (And he doesn't 5 all my sites either.)
|
To-do updates and discussion. |
max |
|
0 |
2006-01-17 |
comment by:
comment:
no net fight here... re: vote weighting... so are some peoples votes going to be worth more based on seniority or by how they vote? or would it be something like you start off only being allowed to vote a certain range and you can 'earn' the right to downvote when you become a regular user? i never could understand the multiple account moderation, how fast people get caught or if the votes they made are truly deleted. sometimes i think , for better or worse, an all paid ytmnd could be in the future, like the SA forums are. it keeps people from making multiple accounts, or abusing the one they have. no matter which direction it goes theres bound to be bugs and problems... my only other concern is that if there are changes in voting, etc that benefits new sites, the old classics will get unfairly buried. que sera sera.
|
To-do updates and discussion. |
max |
|
0 |
2006-01-17 |
comment by:
comment:
the other problem (or is it a problem?) with all these users is that if a fad does start, theres enough people that someone can make something popular enough right away that it basically 'ends' the fad. you know... why bother when soandso did it as good as its going to get... as for the forums, so long as i've been on ytmnd i've never ever found them useful for anything other than having to scroll through several pages of bill cosby's head and pictures of the french chick from harry potter. was there ever a time the forums actually helped ytmnd?
|
?e-baumsworld wont let any more in |
grabasso |
(3.75) |
2,199 |
2006-01-08 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
haha good for you man-nice!! By the way I found you by looking at that 'cockspewage' guys page. He is such a d*ck he called all my sites gay too what a f*g. Is there a way to get him removed??
|
?Classic Nick :( |
Kerosene |
(4.24) |
134,929 |
2006-01-15 |
comment by:
rating given:
(1.00)
comment:
Longer than Ben Hur, and somehow less funny. It's a f*cking building that's gone. That's all. If you wax nostalgic about a soundstage, there's something wrong with you. And it's not like this is a GOOD site just because you pasted title screens from old T
|
To-do updates and discussion. |
max |
|
0 |
2006-01-17 |
comment by:
comment:
Okay, how about this then. For the first 6 minths, a member has his voting habits monitored. If there is an excess of 5 or 1 votes in a row, or it looks like it's all 1s or 5s, that person loses voting priveledges.
In other words, only people with actual votes get their votes in.
Also, there needs to be a report function for any critiques. Simply put, there are too many f*gs leaving their crap in the comments. Well, f*gs and illiterate morons who forgot their yiddish cups.
|
?Classic Nick :( |
Kerosene |
(4.24) |
134,929 |
2006-01-15 |
comment by:
rating given:
(3.00)
comment:
Good memories there. Now if someone could make a seperate site of all the sh*t shows that nick is showing now then it would be complete. Like Zoey 101, Romeo, Nick Cannon, Neds Declassified, etc..basically all the teen shows.
|
?Barret Myspace Suicide |
macaboros |
(1.71) |
1,370 |
2006-01-04 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
re: all your base . theres a 'runaway' site that covers all the lost non-ytmnd fads - runawaymeme.ytmnd.com - thats why all your base is not in mine.
|
?(nsfw) Walter Sobchak: The More You Know PS... |
MasterSitsu |
(4.31) |
20,580 |
2006-01-23 |
comment by:
rating given:
(5.00)
comment:
This is the best 'the more you know' there is. Out of..all three of them.
|
?guess who sucks?1 |
frezericks |
(1.40) |
1,228 |
2006-01-13 |
comment by:
rating given:
(0.00)
comment:
how lame my life is? your the one who finds a new person to the site and downvotes all their sh*t just to be an ass.my entire work is saying things suck? you're just wrong there. you wouldn't bother me if you weren't so wrong.
|