YTMND Search

 (5.00)

I do love The Fragile, but I think this fad would be much better for something like The Locust or Brutal Truth....

 (0.00)

max sould ban this....why would you even think of doing something like this that guy is dead! and your makeing him in to a joke...wtf is your prob?

 (0.00)

It's choppy and crappy looking, if you made it interactive and just let us do it for real, then it would be something.

 (1.00)

That is a nice picture. But you didn't draw it or do anything creative with it. It would be different if you had used that picture as part of a joke, or story, or something but all you did was upload somebody else's nice picture...

 (1.00)

at least Whetstone stood for something. he took a side and fought for it. you don't have the balls to do that. because you know deep down inside your puny heart that if you were to take a stand, yoru viewpoint, no matter how solid you believe it to be, would be subject to the same amount of criticism and scrutiny from the other side. the real conclusion that nobody seems to want to accept here is this: science and logic can't even begin to wrap themselves around the concept of an almighty God.

 (1.00)

fake, theres no way steve would do something that sick anyway

 (3.00)

ummm, i'd rather you do something useful for society one hour a day. Idk, like mentor a kid or something. Or build a house. Volunteer at the hospital. Idk, something that ACTUALLY makes a difference. Praying really doesn't help. Just ask Terry Schiavo. Good intentions and everything like that give you a 3, but real help would be more appreciated than pray-help (which isn't really help at all). Also, I live in the richest country on the planet, I'm sure someone else would need "prayers" more than me.

 (0.00)

i just wish things like these could be brought to global attention and people would actually do something about it

 (0.00)

"KingD: Remember, we win if we are rejected in His name. We win if others laugh and mock us. We win when people say we're lunatics and curse us in His name. We win." EXACTLY PROVING MY EARLIER POINT. It's always about PRIDE, PRIDE, PRIDE. It's not really about learning and doing what's best to help your fellow man, is it? In the end, you follow your faith because you want to WIN. You say you help other humans because you're good, but the reality is clear: You do it because you believe you will be rewarded for it in an afterlife. Because it would be stupid to help others if you don't get something in return, right? :/

 (3.00)

This is one of the more intelligent arguments, so nothing I say is bashing really. I do have one argument/question though. Let's rule out the universe as meaning time space and matter and instead as the expanding body that did indeed begin. Yes, the body began, but if it is expanding, would it not have to have something to expand into? The best analogy I have is to compare it to fire, but it's hardly sufficient. I don't claim to be knowing enough to truly take on your theory, but this was all I asked. By the way, although it's logical, there are multiple logical explanations to lots of individual issues, that doesn't make them right.

 (0.00)

And cyberen, whether you believe in prayer or not, I just wanted to stress that the effect of this on Steve's family is something we all should give pause to consider right now. There are those out there who believe in prayer, and if you do, now would certainly be the time for it. But to each his own. I also included the link to donations for those who wish to respond in that way.

 (0.00)

Okay Whetstone. I'll bite. I'm not against this, but I have a question i'd really like on your site. You say that the debate about Square Circles is that it was in God's idea not to have square circles so if he were to make them he'd be imperfect. Right? Well, is this to say that his idea for the world was perfect? I mean, he made the world perrfect right since he is indeed also perfect? So why is their hate, murder, racism, war, disease, crime, death, pain? I mean, I'm sure that sounds cliche, but i'm serious..The world is far from perfect, why? Why would god make this? And don't tell me that it was us, because A: Most diseases aren't man made and B: If you believe in Predetermination and all of that jazz, he'd have to know we would do something wrong.

 (1.00)

 (5.00)

Hats off for you. You are honest, not flaming anybody and really, really smart and wise. Sounds like you were guided by the Holy Spirit or something! :D After some time, I realised that people that say "God doesn't exist" are ignorant people. They don't understand that atheism is a belief. They canno't prove the unexistance of God. Anyways, you have brought a lot of good with this thing, believe me. Even if some didn't start thinking on this matter after this, when they will, they will remember this. And people who won't, know that God is out there and are afraid of that. That makes them to fight against that. I would also like to say that there will be always people that won't like what you are doing. But don't stop. You make a difference. A good one!

 (1.00)

so then why would you care what we rate it? I'M GONNA TYPE A PARAGRAPH TO DEFEND MYSELF AND MY PERSONAL YTMNDS!! If you want to make something that bad, do it somewhere else if you don't want it to be publicly judged, until then, we are all going to hate on you since ytmnd is all about making sh*t for strange internet pedophiles... since its max's site and his rules specifically state no stuff like this, I would say you are in the wrong here, so don't bother to defent this crap, it makes you look like an idiot...

 (4.00)

If you honestly believe steve irwin "had it coming", then you are a dumbsh*t. For the most part, deadly animals are only deadly to dumbasses who have no idea to handle these animals. For god's sake, automobiles kill more people worldwide every year than deadly animals do. And most of us here are in a car everyday. Why? Because we take precautions to protect us, even in the face of something that could very well be considered deadly. He did the same. If there was ever a d oubt about the safety of Steve OR the animal, the shoot would simply not be done. Steve was never reckless with his job, and took it very seriously.

 (0.00)

This was a good try to blend science with religion but i see it as flawed. You use the law of causality to say that everything that comes to be has a sufficient prior cause. You then say that there was was a first cause (that started it all) but according to the law that is incorrect. God would have had to have something before him that would have caused him. You use a Scientific law then exempt what you call the first cause. doing so you just broke the law making this assumption impossible.

 (2.00)

You get a plus 1 because you at least tried to use logic. You have proven to a reasonable extent that something that we do not understand created the universe, but you haven't proven what. Which do you think statistically would be more likely to be the cause of the universe: A being that somehow knows everything, yet manages to make mistakes, is full of contradictions, and has yet to give us any evidence of its existence, or f*cking anything else because choice one makes no sense.

 (5.00)

it's depressing cause it seems like something that never should've happened, as much as Steve would do things dangerous he always survived, to think he dies to something of which he doesn't provoke is almost ironic, but it's very sad.

 (1.00)

Not proof enough for me. I also don't believe you proved yourself at all when you said that God didn't have to be created by something/someone previous, since God is absolutely NOTHING like Washington and there would be no way to compare them. I still do not particularly believe, I remain agnostic.

 (2.00)

this seems like something family guy would do...copy an exact scene from a movie and replace the original character with the "new" one but use the same dialogue and setup

 (5.00)

You know what I hate...People who 1 this site..because they do NOT believe in this site so WHY come to it?Only f*cken blah blah racist stuff..stuff like that..will 1 this site because they do NOT get the meaning of this, and then they would say something like "LOL THERE IS NO GOD" well they're stupid EVERY single one of them, well, here's a question if god doesnt exist how do you suppose it created? by itself? Pssh ya right..how was civilization created? a monkey? lol retards...how was the monkey created..?

 (1.00)

Also, how can you say that it was definitely a GOD that created the first cause- the effect of which was the universe's existance? God refers to something sentient and aware of what it is doing, doesn't it? Therefore, you suppose that in order to cause the universe something would have had to have actively planned its actions, which is not a logical next step but a total supposition. Does a mud slide plan to kill hundreds of people at the base of a mountain? God can't be proven now and likely never will be.

 (3.00)

Also, the cosmological argument does not prove that God exists, as the term God carries with it a certain number of characteristics that, unless you are a follower of Spinoza, you would not do without. The first cause argument, if true (not likely), means that something caused the universe to come into existence. That's it. You have no reason to attribute omniscience or omnipotence or anything else to it, and doing so illogically would disrespect the logical conclusions that you attempted...

 (0.00)

Is god matter? Non-matter can not create matter. Unless you want to change your rules. If he was matter, he would not be the first clause. Similarily, he would have been crushed by the forces present at the first singularity of the universe. On a different note, you have created a "First cause" for something that we do not yet understand. Examples come from earlier civilization. Early humans believed that Lightening was caused by god. It's fairly obvious that it's not. The idea is similar to that ofcreati

 (1.00)

Just as newton's laws of gravity apply only in certain circumstances, such as here on earth and under only certain "non-extreme" conditions, so to do the laws of causality function in this way. So, we need to come up with something else to explain how it works in those extreme conditions, just as Einsteins theory of relativity would replace Newton's laws under certain circumstances.

 (0.00)

I've learned all those things in Philosophy class. While you do bring up a good point, you still do not answer whether or not it's God. You can propose it was something with certain characterisitcs all you like, but that doesn't mean it's true. Although God may exist, it's possible he does not hold all of the characteristics you proposed. For example, he may be omnipotent (which would allow him to create the universe), but he may not be omniscient and/or omnibenevolent.

 (5.00)

I think Benny Hill works well with the whole idea... Almost looks like something he would do... or Mel Brooks for that matter...

 (5.00)

I love this. I would buy this stuff. How about... A pencil that has something to do with the Nelson Fad.

 (0.00)

I dont know why but its awsome dude, just the fact people on wow acctually care and would do something like this is pretty dam awsome, Basicly what it is, is theyre dedicating that Island to the Crocodile hunter and... cuz its croc island and you know yeah i dont know shut up.